That's what you said the last 10 posts but you continuously check back. No surprises from a guy with such a massive internet ego who has to repeatedly spout the same bullcrap with no evidence to support it. Not once did you actually address any of my questions, instead you just skirt around it. Then you go for strawmen arguments, nobody made any of the points you suggested but somehow you spend all your efforts arguing for it. You couldn't even provide the simple proof of an article which supports your argument that "the majority of athletes are doped even when their drug test results appear clean". I won't be surprised if you appear in this thread again, then finish off with another "I will totally not reply anymore, you lose, I'm leaving, don't say anything anymore I totally won't read it." Bark away.
I missed the whole doping discussion, but you're a fool if you don't think a lot, if not most, of the top athletes at the Olympics aren't doping. Of course they are. As was the whole East Germany Olympic generation. I really don't care if they haven't been tested positive. Use your freaking brain. It's common sense. They may not be proven to be guilty, but I don't need proof to believe the obvious. This is sorta old, but did you guys know Bolt for one was training with a "former" Steriod dealer? http://deadspin.com/5857439/what-do...-train-with-the-same-admitted-steroids-dealer The in the link embedded docu is pretty good, though sadly it's in German, so most of you guys won't be able to understand it. Just looking at Bolt's body language though it's so blatantly obvious he's lying in the interview they did with him (starts at 7:34), it's not even funny.
Exactly, but guys like flamingdts or SunsRocketsfan are not believing anything until it's proven. They make it clear they don't know what doping is and how easy it is to avoid being tested postive, making them foolishly believe few caught athletes equal few dopers. This is not about providing a definite fact, but all ties between athletes and notorious doping dealers, emails, busted athletes, coming outs, ridiculous jumps in records over the years lead to a very logical conclusion, anyone who dismisses that is out of touch with reality.
So you are saying that, in your opinion, the best athletes are all guilty of doping? Which also means that since the majority of athletes are doping, the drug test system is a complete failure? That's an automated message, not a post. I knew you weren't bright but now you are just making simple jack look less simple. Bark somewhere else if you are just going to troll you clown.
^^ Flaming just leave it, it's too obvious you know nothing about this topic and your only point is "give me links" while it's clear there's no proof on this topic. Use your tiny brain for once instead of moronically believing anti-doping tests are a powerful method in today's fight agaisnt doping. The "random person making it's own crack" comparison you made basically disqualifies you from every doping discussion on the planet and you are too caught up in your ignorant little act to realize it. Some people on this forum use the word "trolling" when someone brings up a legit discussion that is based on common sense and questioning the system, it's so terribly off. All the hateful accusations and remarks don't make it better when people with even a bit knowledge on doping and athletics can see you're plain naive and don't know one bit, still you continue in your ignorant ways. You don't even make your own points, just random "give me links" or "do you think so many drug tests fail?!"(as naive as it gets, could be made by the 10yr-old child of a top athlete), mixed with pointless rhetorics that don`t help you here. Now your ****ty little "I knew you weren't bright" when I put you on my ignore list and mocked you. Let me tell you, the ignore message has the same amount of actual content and insight on this topic as you, it just doesn't tell us all how naive and blind it is. I'm classified as highly gifted iq-wise, but of course, believing that the majority of top athletes at the Olympics dopes makes me stupid, yeah...right. You don't realize that you are the idiot here that made the most idiotic doping comparison on the planet, provided links that chopped his own points and acknowledged mine. Do you even realize how off your posts are? You are so far away from the truth here it's sad, but your giant ego still makes you believe you are looking smart here. I think you're full of sh.. and try to win argumentations by throwing out random questions that can't be proven and only show your level of stubbornness, while you never provide insight or actual thoughts on your own. Let me make a flamingdts paragraph and throw it at you for once: Your points...embarassing. So you say doping tests, which all know are behind the times and limited, detect the MAJORITY of dopers? Do you even know how retarted that sounds? And you really believe that the best athletes don't take doping, even if their coaches are notorious doping dealers with a huge cheating history? At this point it seems you are covering your ears and yelling out random crap. Only reply when you find one quote that is from an anti-doping scientist and says "New kinds of doping are easily detectable for us, it's idiotic to think there can be any new doping that we can't detect, because doping is like any other simple drug(crack) and can't be hidden from our glorious tests. We truly believe we find the clear majority of dopers, anyone that says otherwise is r****ded." So....link? /flamingdts mode
I didn't read any of that because you literally just spent all your time writing an essay of personal insults. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-great-olympic-feats-raise-suspicions&page=2 http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/12/london-olympics-2012-anti-doping This is called evidence. Now, how about you show me an article that specifically states that "the majority of athletes are doped, even when they are cleared in tests".
I didn't insult you, just stated the obvious. You talking about writing paragraphs of personal insults, hypocrisy at it's finest. First link is a simple legal standpoint which I said is correct. Nothing added to prove anything in this topic, pointless. Second link is completely about Nandrolone, fail on your side. "We're at a point now for London 2012 where we can say we have a really good coverage of the things that are prohibited" Yea, that sounds like bullet-proof "evidence". Still provided nothing relevant on your side, try harder.
You're trolling, I'm done. All you do is incite insults, not once adding anything relevant. You provided no proof, and when I do you dismiss it entirely. Even when I provide a quote from the director of drug control center himself that he is confident they have a strong and up to date drug test. This is pathetic, you have been dying for the last word. You have said literally a few times already you are "done in this thread" and that , but you just keep coming back like a cockroach. It's as if you don't have better things to do. And I do feel sorry for you. Because I can tell you really need this. Maybe life outside the internet isn't going so well for you. After all, if you are having such a tough time on the internet, I can't possibly fathom how you deal with people face to face. Thus, it's specifically because I feel so sorry for you, that not only will I allow you to insult me as much as you want for your last response post, I will even read it and not retort no matter how senseless and untrue your post is. So as a kind gesture, I will also teach you how to be a man of your word and actually do what you say. In this case, leaving the thread. Ready to satisfy what your life lacks? Go.
Seems you're at your end if you call that evidence, terrible. "I didn't read any of that...", that's where I should've stopped reading or replying toyour bs. I think I can see the light, my last post ever to Mr. "I engage in a discussion without knowing anything about it, flavour my posts with insults and useless links that prove nothing. If my opponent brings up a link that dismisses my point I'm just gonna ignore it to the fullest and carry on in my stubborn ways, adding more stupid accusations without any foundation." You are a naive person that believes anything until it's proven otherwise, you probably would've believed the Earth is flat hundreds of years ago and said "ROUND, HOW r****dED IS THAT, FIND ME PROVE THAT IT'S NOT FLAT...EMBARASSING!!!" I can almost see the light...ah...a world without flamingdts...I can sleep in peace now. If I see a "last post: flamingdts" again I will shake my head in disbelief, please let this die, I won't reply to you moron anymore.
wtf yung-t i didnt read any of your threads but one thing I can say is you are not a man of your words. I thought you were done posting about this topic. Apparently you just cant stay away
If someone posts in such ignorant and insulting ways I naturally have to defend myself, feels wrong to let someone go with that, I know I shouldn't even have replied to his first moronic, baseless one word statement in the other thread. I normally don't act like that, but something in flaming's post makes me rage to the fullest, maybe because he goes 0-100 with insults and throws out accusations without even bringin up a point or responding properly. And then actin like he has the upper hand or adds to the topic when he doesn't... Sorry to turn this thread into a war over something that can't be proven, it all goes down to what you believe in, rest is not based on evidence. People can make a case about it in a nice manner, if not this sadly doesn't lead to anything. All I say is use your common sense and evaluate all information on a topic, then post about it.
I'll have to agree with you here.. Do I agree doping happens in sports? Absolutely. But I choose to believe not to the extent that you claim. So yeah it does come down to what you believe and hopefully this topic can end since the last page is just a bunch of insults back and forth. Best to just enjoy the rest of the olympics.
