1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Does "S" video really make a differance?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by ROXRAN, Dec 27, 2002.

  1. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,856
    Likes Received:
    5,252
    I know, I know ...you can do better than S-video, but I have the basic hookup on my DVD, but I recently (Christmas) got a new T.V. that has the S-video connection and I wanted to know if it really is worth it to reach behind the T.V. and strain yourself for a minute to rearrange the video picture connection?
     
  2. RiceRocket1

    RiceRocket1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    23
    Yeah, you can definitely tell a difference IMO. I'd go for it.
     
  3. R0ckets03

    R0ckets03 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    16,326
    Likes Received:
    2,042
    No doubt it makes a difference. Quit playing with your guns for a minute and take your lazy ass behind that tv.
     
  4. rockHEAD

    rockHEAD Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 1999
    Messages:
    10,337
    Likes Received:
    123
    hey rox, it's probably more of a pain to mess with all them tangled up wires... eh forget it about it...

    go shoot some squirrels instead.
     
  5. codell

    codell Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    715
    IMO, S-Video is much better than a regular coxial connection.

    However, the superior connection for DVD (if you have it) is Component Input. Very clear. I have a Sony 200 disc DVD player and a 55" HD TV and when I play DVDs, it is absolutely, perfectly, crystal clear.

    :D
     
  6. drapg

    drapg Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    2
    The difference between composite and S-video is somewhat negligible and can only be seen by the trained eye.

    However the difference from S-video to component is remarkable.
     
  7. DallasThomas

    DallasThomas Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2002
    Messages:
    3,363
    Likes Received:
    216
    Am I r****ded or something? What is "S" video? Those yellow-red-white plug-ins?
     
  8. Htownhero

    Htownhero Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    2,570
    Likes Received:
    32
    No kidding, I thought I was the only idiot on here. :confused:
     
  9. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,213
    Likes Received:
    2,845
    It is the red-yellow-white deal, only the yellow plug is bigger than the others.
     
  10. FrancisFan

    FrancisFan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2000
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    32
    I thought that S-Video has only one plug (typically yellow) and resembles a PS/2 (Mouse/Keyboard) plug.
     
  11. Vengeance

    Vengeance Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2000
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    23
    It seems to me that the biggest advantage to S-video over composite video is the sharpness of the picture. The color is not much better, but the picture is noticably sharper than the composite video.

    But Component video rocks the crap out of s-video. The picture is razor sharp and the colors are gorgeous!!
     
    #11 Vengeance, Dec 28, 2002
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2002
  12. Bailey

    Bailey Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 1999
    Messages:
    1,977
    Likes Received:
    50
    This could get confusing! Vengeance, I'm guessing you meant "...biggest advantage to S-video over composite video..."
     
  13. Dr of Dunk

    Dr of Dunk Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 1999
    Messages:
    46,657
    Likes Received:
    33,672
    S-video is one cable that carries a video signal - there is no red/yellow/white.
     
  14. Dr of Dunk

    Dr of Dunk Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 1999
    Messages:
    46,657
    Likes Received:
    33,672
    Wow... some early morning geek reading. :D

    Let's clear some stuff up.

    In order of "betterness" :

    composite video ---> S-video ---> component video

    S-video is usually much better looking than composite video.
    Component video is a bit better looking than s-video.

    If you're talking about DVD's, they store data in component video format - it's their native format. When you use s-video or composite, your player has to "convert" or "downgrade" that component signal. That's why component is better - it's the native format of the signal itself.
     
  15. Zac D

    Zac D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2000
    Messages:
    2,733
    Likes Received:
    46
    :confused: composite video < S-video < component video?
     
  16. Dr of Dunk

    Dr of Dunk Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 1999
    Messages:
    46,657
    Likes Received:
    33,672
    Zac... I probably shouldn't have used the "greater than" signs. They were supposed to be like arrows. That's why I said "in order of betterness". I changed it. :)
     

Share This Page