1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Patrick Patterson vs. Jordan Hill

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by AroundTheWorld, Feb 2, 2012.

  1. Miracles Boys33

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    20
    That surgery I think messed up 2pats athleticism its still early so I say after all star break he'll be back to normal. Hill has been a little better with his rebounding but his post moves are still horrible
     
  2. hahachui

    hahachui Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,267
    Likes Received:
    197
    I love hill more than PP....
    we need rebounds...not a jump shooting guy
     
  3. kidcave9

    kidcave9 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    3,062
    Likes Received:
    184
    Hill has shown improvement but can he keep it up?
     
  4. Yodels

    Yodels Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2002
    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    26
    Patterson has more focus. Hill is prone to making mistakes. You can cover those mistakes by playing harder which he has been the last few games that I'm pleased with.
     
  5. lr22

    lr22 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    3
    Hill can rebound, while Patterson can't.
    Patterson can defend the post, while Hill can't.
    Both can shoot from mid range, but reraly make shot from post move.
    They look about the same level players for me, maybe Hill is slightly better so far this season.
     
  6. ArtV

    ArtV Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    6,994
    Likes Received:
    1,700
    I guess I've given Pat more of a free ride because he's newer to the NBA though now I am having 2nd thoughts. Maybe it's just knee jerk from the last few games but if you asked me today, I would rather keep Hill than Patterson. I've always thought Hill at PF was where he belongs but since we had no C, unfortunately he was destined to play out of position which may have actually helped his PF game but he needs to move back to the PF position. And Hill hasn't been playing ball that long so he's still relatively new to the game. He's had some mental distractions over the past year or 2 and I expect that to hopefully start settling down and I'm sure he does too.

    I would like to see Hill remain a Rocket.
     
  7. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,543
    Likes Received:
    38,771
    The Rox should have extended Hill, he is going to cost a lot more than $2 million this offseason.

    DD
     
  8. smuduffy

    smuduffy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    200
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ppatt showed you why tonight

    if you watched tonights game, you understand why PPatt is more valuable than Hill. I agree that he is not comfortable in the paint right now offensively, but his shot is good from all over the court. I think he can improve his post game.

    Defensively, he helps the rockets cover so much ground with help defense and just being in the right spot defensively. He keeps making steps towards what he was last year. And, I still see alot of growth potential.

    I still can't imagine talent evaluators comparing these two guys and really giving JHill a chance against PPatt. I like Hill playing backup C, thats fine, but I'm not heartbroken if he's not here next year b/c someone pays him. I thought his contract was reasonable for a big, so I was slightly surprised it wasn't picked up. But, it is what it is...he certainly woke up AFTER the contract was passed over. Food to think about.
     
  9. Tom Bombadillo

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    29,091
    Likes Received:
    23,991
    I am holding out hope for Jordan, but I have pretty low expectations.


    Patrick though, has TOO much talent and intelligence to not be an above average starter in this league, imo.
     
  10. thetatomatis

    thetatomatis Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2010
    Messages:
    5,699
    Likes Received:
    101
    I would like to keep them both. Let them both play major minutes for cheap. We can dump our high priced veterans who are not really playoff winning worthy anyways. If the veterans are not really a playoff winning type team? It makes more sense for it not to be Patterson vs Hill. The real battle should be Patterson and Hill Vs Scola. I have seen enough to think Hill and Patterson could be good enough to develop into great role players for this team While Scola has little value on a team that is not playoff ready for a big run.
     
  11. ThatBoyNick

    ThatBoyNick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    31,086
    Likes Received:
    48,655
    Yeah its pretty sad we didn't pick up hill's option. Hill looks good right now but i think patterson wins by far in the long run.
     
  12. delishman

    delishman Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    103
    I think in five years I'll very much enjoy reading this thread.
     
  13. Dei

    Dei Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    7,362
    Likes Received:
    335
    Indeed. Patrick looked like he was getting into form this game.

    Jordan should be gone, if not dealt, after this season. Motiejunas'll get the C minutes.
     
  14. Billionzz

    Billionzz Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Messages:
    2,554
    Likes Received:
    94
    These two really don't compare unless your comparing an injured PP with the current JH.

    I hope JH gets it together and figures out how to be consistent I would be glad to have him here if he can do that. Patterson just keeps improving every game, I think people really aren't taking into consideration that he had surgery and still isn't at 100%. I can see him getting better, tonight at the game he missed a shot in close and got the ball back and put it in very quick, he has that very quick jumping ability that seems to be rare.
     
  15. daywalker02

    daywalker02 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    98,878
    Likes Received:
    48,799
    Dwight Superman Howard much?




    I kid
     
  16. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,889
    Likes Received:
    20,037
    Well maybe they think someone on RGV can replicate what Hill gives them. Plus, depending on the team moves we might not have a spot for him, like with Landry when PPat was drafted and Hill arrived.

    Its better to release him now and then pay him a couple million later on if you need him, then keep him around then his 2M salary becomes the reason you out bid on a premier FA.
     
  17. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,889
    Likes Received:
    20,037
    Also I wanted to add not extending Jhill makes him an expiring contract, giving us a short-term "asset" we can use for trades.
     
  18. Tom Bombadillo

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    29,091
    Likes Received:
    23,991
    I feel extremely sorry for the team that spends "a lot more than 2 million" on Jordan Hill this offseason...
     
  19. dmenacela

    dmenacela Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    2,532
    Likes Received:
    620
    PP plays better as a second year rookie than Hill did. The board prefers PP cuz he has more potential (and I agree). Hill is done.
     
  20. Canadiandude

    Canadiandude Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,851
    Likes Received:
    176
    I certainly hope the rest of the NBA start over-valuing Hill like some of you are.
    Expiring contract, trade bait? Win.

    There's no way I'd invest long term in someone who just WAKES up and plays for a contract after he isn't extended.
     

Share This Page