1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

U.A.E Ruler spends 22 million to put his name in land

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by showtang043, Jul 21, 2011.

  1. tallanvor

    tallanvor Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    18,768
    Likes Received:
    11,928
    Are you sure the Saudi government knowingly gives aid to terrorists? Having terrorists and aiding terrorists are two different things. Many Middle Eastern countries are known to sponsor terrorism, Saudi Arabia is not necessarily one of them.
     
  2. showtang043

    showtang043 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    71

    well bin laden's wealth is from Saudi.

    Saudi supports a wahhabi form of islam which is the most oppressive and exclusivist. Some of their views are very consistent with the taliban. Thats the thing about islam, with one billion, its not unified. Islam is not one thing or the other, its different to many others and you will find many other cultures established. But some of the things that have bought to the limelight that are offensive and extreme ideologies are things that saudi supports, it doesn't value pluralism and progression(although the quran has cases for both of these) and is rather oppressive to women too(even though the quran has answers for these too) so indirectly many of these extreme ideas are apart of the issues that breed terrorism. Its undeniably something that should be looked at if us polices all these things in the world, its just odd to me that they get a free pass bc of business. It just shows anterior motive.

    To hear the politicians even they are extreme say things like islam poses a threat on the west and all that bs jihad, why dont you see it with canada, why were the same guys you say are just brought up to believe to hate and be against the west and want to impose themselves on us not wanting to do that to a country just like ours socially and in demographics, why were the same people in business with the us under regan and he respected them highly and they had no issues with them now. It was the same religion right? Maybe...just maybe its more political in nature and about policies, its sad that people are still oblivious to that
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,224
    Likes Received:
    2,847
    Just so you know, none of this qualifies as sponsoring terrorism. Paying the families of suicide bombers, providing terrorist groups with funding and weapons, providing safe havens and training facilities; those are sponsorship of terrorism. Exporting a messed up religious ideology undoubtedly contributes to terrorism, but it is not sponsorship of terrorism. It isn't the kind of thing that the US military is generally used to stop.
    Why do we see is in Bali, England, and Spain? Why were New York and Washington attacked but not Dallas or Salt Lake City? Do they limit their hatred to Americans represented by Democrats? Of course not. Those cities were not targeted because al Queda has a limited (and shrinking) ability to carry out attacks. London, New York and, Washington are undoubtedly high on the list (as would be Los Angeles, which was also targeted though unsuccessfully). Undoubtedly Canada is not targeted for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that Canada is not a driver of basically anything on the world stage, so the messaging in attacking it would be weak.

    Certainly there is also a political element to what they are doing. You can get that right from the horse's mouth. Bin Laden said the reason for the attacks was troops in the holy land. Of course Canadian troops participated in Afghanistan and (in very limited numbers) in Iraq, so that would not excuse Canada from reprisals.

    Having said all of that, to try to divorce Islam from Islamic terrorism is intellectually dishonest. Just as we can look at the words of the terrorists themselves to determine that they had some political motives, we can also look to their words and see that they feel compelled to act by their religion.
     
  4. CrazyDave

    CrazyDave Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,027
    Likes Received:
    439
    We had the others. Canada called Saudi. EMIRATE?
     
  5. showtang043

    showtang043 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    71
    I genuinely don't think its Islamic. I think the voice and vocabulary they use is Islamic, and that is about it. Think about who they have killed the most? Muslims. In pakistan, afghanistan and beyond, there are terrorist kidnappings, bombings, oppression, fairly daily. They don't spare anyone, they are just exclusivist to anyone who doesn't see things there way including there supposed own kind.


    Not only that, the answers are in the holy text too. For when it does refer to war, often for a context of a certain time, there are numerous other parts about killing innocents, about jews/christians being brothers, and that there are many ways to salvation not just one ideology. On top of that there is mention of respect and regard for women, etc. You can find versus in the bible as well that is gruesome, violent, and calls for people who don't accept jesus, including your own family to be stoned. Its in there and it doesn't mean that the religion is the issue, because the general theme is about forgiveness and a spiritual journey. This is similar with Islam.


    Its sad to see people make it an islam thing, or an islam vs thing not only because it groups people like myself who have nothing to do with and don't feel i share any views or beliefs with these people(and I am a muslim with some descent from pakistan) who find them to be an enemy not just as an American but as a Mulsim, but in the end of the day all people do is give them credibility when they say that. If its political only or material, then that is one thing, but what motivates them to say its a reiligious battle, its something divine they are meant to defend as muslims. The media and so on needs to stop dignifying them at that an make these cowards feel like they are assholes. If some crazy supremacist says he killed people because he is a true american or a true christian(kkk considers themselves religious generally), that doesn't make american or christian ideology, that makes tht crazy guy an extremist. When we start saying hes this or that, we dignify him and give him more credit than he is due. Thats why I do realize the voice they use is islamic, but for us to accept that and overlook the facts just feeds them more.
     
  6. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,494
    Likes Received:
    9,362
    Looks like a shovel ready project.
     
  7. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    63,517
    Likes Received:
    59,021
    <img src="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/311779/HAMAD-PRIVATE-ISLAND.jpg">

    Epic FAIL!! He spelled his name upside down, like a stupid Aussie would!
     
  8. Northside Storm

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    11,262
    Likes Received:
    450
    oh yeah, our counter-intelligence department of Epic Meal Time definitely got em.
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,282
    While this is eccentric and wasteful and in a way typical for some of the boastful idiots in the region, it really doesn't hurt anyone. I don't see anything wrong with it. I'll get worked up about treatment of women and minorities in that region 10 times before I would even pay attention to this.
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,282
    It's not "people" who "make it an Islam thing". The perpetrators themselves cite their interpretation of Islam as their motive.

    Their motive is nationalism or Christian extremism. The motive of Islamist terrorists is Islamic extremism. As much as you would prefer for the media to not call it what it is - it is what it is.
     
  11. CrazyDave

    CrazyDave Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,027
    Likes Received:
    439
    What a relief.:p
     
  12. Northside Storm

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    11,262
    Likes Received:
    450
    "Bacon strips, and bacon strips, and bacon strips!"
     
  13. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,875
    Likes Received:
    3,745
    some guy was on some msnbc show promoting some book about 9-11 including how the connections to saudi were ignored.

    vanity fair has an aritcle in its august edition
     
  14. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,224
    Likes Received:
    2,847
    When people blow up an abortion clinic, that is Christian terrorism. I can of course point you to the places in the Holy Bible that forbid Christians from killing, but at least part of the motivation for these people is their religion, most likely a very big part. The same is true of Muslim terrorists. Just because other members of their faith say, "You're doing it wrong," doesn't mean that their religion has nothing to do with it.
     
    1 person likes this.
  15. showtang043

    showtang043 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    71
    you're still not getting the point I am trying to make, there's no doubt that in that case they use christianity as a vehicle and voice to justify and even glorify their actions and that on other cases they have used islam as the voice to justify/glorify there actions, yet the facts are when the religion says otherwise as well, should we really be dignifying their cause saying yea you guys are ultra religious or doing this for your religion. You just rile them up and make them feel like its some sort of divine fight that they are meant to do. The fact is they are killing muslims, christian terrorist kills christians, its very much politlca, social, or often based on other things, and the guy who is crazy, inpoverty, or has political issues probably would use something else as an excuse if he was something else. We should just recognize insanity, crazy and label it appropriately rather than helping/dignifying their cause in my opinion.

    Do we really want to support them and rile them up and make them feel like what they what they are doing is right? Then when we say its about the religion, that is what we are doing. Regardless if its christian, muslim, whatever even the guys doing it for the 'government', its some extremist manipulating some sort of system or institution to justify his own insanity and i feel it should be labeled as such.
     
  16. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,282
    I'd say they must have been pretty riled up already to kill people. And they already thought they were fighting some sort of divine fight.

    You are confusing cause and effect.
     
  17. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,224
    Likes Received:
    2,847
    I get the point you are trying to make, I just don't agree with it. I understand that you don't want Islam associated with the terrorists, though I suspect it has less to do with riling them up or justifying their actions and more to do with avoiding the stain on Islam. You are free to pretend that the terrorist that say they are fighting a Jihad for Allah has nothing to do with Islam, but I don't have to play along.
     
    1 person likes this.
  18. MamboRock

    MamboRock Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    50
    Using the money stolen from his people to make a name for himself. What a scumbag.
     
  19. showtang043

    showtang043 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    71
    no, that isn't my point. I very well realize that they say its for a jihad and yada yada, I am saying they are misguided when they say that as the answers on the prophet's version on the jihad are fairly clear, but they are hearing what they want to make it some divine fight, when you are misguided adn say yes its the religion that tells them to do this, all you do is tell them, yea you're right to believe and think this rather look, you are misguided the religion says this is wrong right here and here, and see there answers there adn how they gain support without using religion.

    I know what they say, but its our responsibility to be educated and informed to be able to understand the truth better and to prevent other issues with this as well. My point is not to take out a stain on islam, all the religions have had their wards so on, and often they are just people manipulating acient contexts to suit their visions. I am saying this can help differentiate and stop grouping people like them who I have nothing to do with and people like myself under one umbrella.
     

Share This Page