The Obama Adminstration's Handling of Wall Street.

1. SEC enforcement division attorneys are not political appointees are not effected one iota by any campaign contribution - even the ones that occurred in the 1990's that would require a time machine to have the effect that you claim.
2. SEC can't put anybody in jail, that is what DOJ does.
3. You can't put a corporation in jail.
4. You have absolutely no evidence for this statement


Good luck with law school though. .

Nice - it just keeps getting dumber and dumber. Why don't you identify a single isntance of Goldman Sachs doing this? Unlike Koch industries - it's a public company, so it wouldn't be hard to figure out that it's funneling hundreds of millions into right wing think tanks. It's obviously the story of the century if so, so if you find this out, remember to thank me when you become famous.

 

Hard to think he's handled it in a better way. Wall Street = rich and powerful people. The market has only gone up a considerable % since he took the presidency, thus those same people have only become richer.

 

Umm.. Preet Bharara has been pretty busy lately puting poeple in jail, but otherwise it's kind of hard to put people in jail when you don't have enough evidence to do so.

Actually I can clarify it for you: it didn't. That's why they had to pay the largest fine in history.

So which ones? Give me some names.

So you still have no evidence, but you can refer to Robert Rubin 20 years ago about something totally different.

 

yes this wikileaks guy makes a lot of sense to bring up. Oh wait no it doesn't.

The SEC did refer the case to the DOJ, genius. But facts haven't stopped you yet, I trust this time will prove no different.

So you're saying that the government could convict all of these people of crimes, if it wanted to, but it won't ? Can you please detail the charges for my own amusement? thanks brah.

 

as much as joseph cassano screwed up the banking system, what crime did he actually commit?

 

^ two nonresponsive posts in a row, I guess that means you can't find anything to charge joe Cassano with either.

 

Why don't you connect the dots of your theory for us - why must you be such a lil' scamp?

Angelo Mozilo did not get prosecuted because he owns the U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, Andre Birotte Jr - a career federal prosecutor who specialized in narcotics cases, and later the IG of the LAPD. because of rent-seeking. Andre Birotte Jr. - appointed in 2009, has been bought and paid for by Mozilo's Countrywide Financial Corporation, which went bust in early 2008.

This involved Angelo Mozilo finding two wormholes in space time, joining them together to a point in 2003, and traveling back in time to buy the mortgage on Birotte's house, which future Angelo Mozilo uses to hold over his head to avoid prosecution. Occam's razor.

 

And until we invent time travel, which is what most of your theories require. Again, another future possible career path for you, brah.

 

I understood your points perfectly. Except there is just one problem. You alleged fraud. Hence to claim the U.S. government somehow was too cozy with Goldman and covered up the fraud, you'd first have to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that there is fraud. And it doesn't go something along the lines of "it's wrong" and more along the lines of "it's illegal." Failing that there's nothing to discuss here.

Whether the government is too cozy with Wall Street is another matter, but at this point, the fundamental of your premise is false.

And one would also clearly make an argument that by seeking politically motivated punishment on Goldman, to save one's own political career/hide, would go along way to demonstrate that it always motivated, on the part of the USG, one's own self-interest as supposed to being somehow legally favourable to Goldman.

You're alleging corruption. I think that's a worthwhile topic. But you haven't successfully expanded upon it in a meaningful way.

And yet somehow Sammy the moron became an expert on structured products despite never having even looked at a deal, and who incidentally, can't seem to tell assets from his ass. Bottom line Sammy, fraud implies intent. Where's the proof of intent?

And. LMAO. I'm gonna keep a running tally of how many times you say H-1B in this thread. It's rapidly becoming a joke all by itself.

 

What crime do you allege? The law doesn't prosecute based on stupidity. If it did you'd have to tack many more names to that list of yours.

I can't also help but notice that while you claim the stupidity of Wall Street is criminal, you treat the stupidity of investors as being victimized.

 

I'm just curious - MFW, SamFisher, Major:

Why are you attacking Northside Storm? Because he claims Goldman Sachs committed a crime? Because he claims Goldman Sachs has too much influence over government policy? Because he is saying Obama has too many Goldman Sachs employees in his circle of advisors?

If I'm incorrect, please correct me.

 

lol. I too am curious, although I think I already have a good idea.