1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Shaq's Lakers would have Killed Micheal's Bulls?

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by what, May 9, 2011.

?

Pick One

  1. True

    21.7%
  2. False

    78.3%
  1. Aleron

    Aleron Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    11,685
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    Well after losing Grant (to the team that beat them), the need for a mop up pf was there.
     
  2. bullardfan

    bullardfan なんでやねん

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,597
    Likes Received:
    101
    i thought we were talking about Shaq and Kobe and the championship Lakers that lost only 1 game in the 2001 playoffs? That team could very well take MichAel Jordan's best Bulls team in less than 7 games.

    L.A. Phil Jackson would know how to handle his younger self and any weaknesses that the Bulls team had.
     
    #62 bullardfan, May 10, 2011
    Last edited: May 10, 2011
  3. Aleron

    Aleron Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    11,685
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    there are very few teams in nba history that would have challenged that '96 bulls team, and the 01 lakers aren't one of them.
     
  4. Aleron

    Aleron Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    11,685
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    the 83 sixers, 86 celtics and 87 lakers (where kareem went all vintage in the finals)
     
  5. emjohn

    emjohn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    All that pwnage above.


    what, honest question, were you watching the NBA through the 90s? It's okay if you weren't/weren't old enough, I'm asking because I don't know you but your statement suggests it.

    Dismissing the fact that they did go through Ewing's Knicks and Shaq's Magic....the second threepeat Bulls were specifically built to beat elite centers (specifically Shaq). Luc Longley and Bill Wennington were there to body up one on one and be foul machines...and Longley was a lot better than people remember.

    And the Lakers depth wasn't impressive. Horry, Fox, Fisher and the annual rotation of ringless vets (Richmond, Rice) are a joke versus Rodman-Kukoc-Harper (Harper/Fisher being the closest to equal footing)
     
  6. bullardfan

    bullardfan なんでやねん

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,597
    Likes Received:
    101
    1994, 1995, and maybe 1996 Rockets
     
  7. The Cat

    The Cat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,836
    Likes Received:
    5,434
    The '96 Sonics took those Bulls to six games, and the '01 Lakers are a lot better than that group. I'm not saying I know for sure the Lakers are better, but to say they wouldn't even challenge seems a little silly.
     
  8. what

    what Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    14,621
    Likes Received:
    2,593
    Wins say more about the quality of competition in the league rather than the strength of the actual team itself.

    And besides, matchups are what this thread is about and the fact remains micheal's only lose in that 7 year span was to a shaq led magic team.

    It's funny how micheal's stats for that year in the playoffs were 31.5 and it wasn't like he was heading to a team or system he wasn't familiar with.

    If the bulls don't get rodman they might not have won again. Or even if shaq had went to a loaded team with experience. But again the star's aligned for Micheal and the mystique continues.
     
  9. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,072
    Likes Received:
    15,251

    But, Shaq's Magic eliminated Jordan and the Bulls the prior season. And, I'd take Kobe over Penny Hardaway. I think it's endlessly debatable who would win (since we'll never get to see it), and I don't think either side should be too confident. I could see Jordan winning, depending on the supporting casts and other minor factors, but in uncertain cases like that, I'm going to go with Shaq because scoring in the paint is such an advantage in the NBA. I think Shaq/Kobe matches up pretty well with Jordan/Pippen to start off; it'd be everything else that decides the series.
     
  10. Halfback10

    Halfback10 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    8

    Hey little boy, you must be in diapers when Rodman owned Shaq. LOL!
     
  11. Icehouse

    Icehouse Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2000
    Messages:
    13,657
    Likes Received:
    4,036
    This response is for you and what. The Bulls didn't have a legit PF in 95, as Horace Grant was in Orlando. A PF that could defend the perimiter and get back to the interior was crucial to their defensive scheme. The following year they got a PF again and continued winning. Since the topic is about whether or not those Lakers could beat any of the Bulls teams that won titles, I don't see why we are mentioning the 95 team that didn't win a title.
     
  12. Rockets Pride

    Rockets Pride Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Messages:
    3,674
    Likes Received:
    443
    MJ championships teams would beat any team since them.
     
  13. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    i agree with this.
     
  14. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,804
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    the 96 sonics may have been in the finals when the rockets were had it not been for the 94/95 nuggets. that team was close a lot of times, including losing to barkley's suns, good team that just could only get over that hump once
     
  15. Rockets Pride

    Rockets Pride Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Messages:
    3,674
    Likes Received:
    443
    So i see how people dog kobe, no the shaq championship teams, simply saying that any great guard could have won with Shaq.

    So i guess Shaq is better than MJ right?
     
  16. Rockets Pride

    Rockets Pride Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Messages:
    3,674
    Likes Received:
    443
    may have been
    close
    not been for
     
  17. t_mac1

    t_mac1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    26,614
    Likes Received:
    211
    they had penny, a top 5 player at the time.

    and no, shaq's lakers would not beat the bulls. but it would be a very competitive and fun series to watch
     
  18. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    and they were absolutely on fire in 1996 during the playoffs. they were shooting at a ridiculous clip, as i recall.

    but i still feel like the 2001 laker team would be a tougher matchup for that bulls squad than the 1996 sonics.
     
  19. adoo

    adoo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    11,914
    Likes Received:
    8,021
    conversely, Shaq's Lakers teams never won against an elite team w two top 50 players of all time.

    MJ's Bull teams were better team defenders; any of these Bull teams would easily handle any of Shaq's Laker team; probably 4-2
    if i m not mistken, evey team had 2 of the 50 greatest players of all time + role players willing to play tough D and take crap from Chief Triangle.


    no ?
    obviously, you haven't seen / heard much. do you know about Moses Malone's 4-4-4 team w Philly, where they swept every playoff series. the Shaq / Kobe teams never came close to that.
     
  20. Rockets Pride

    Rockets Pride Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Messages:
    3,674
    Likes Received:
    443
    didn't shaq/kobe pull a 4-0 4-0 4-1 ? something like that
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now