US Scolds Naughty Bad Boys France and Russia and the UN

You don't always have to walk softly when you carry THE big stick.

 

We should strike Russia now while we pretend to be their friends. Then, we can launch an attack from Southern Russia into Iraq. Then, we will be in a position to close in on Iran. Then, we will be in a better position to deal with China, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia. We have them all right where we want them.

Hoo Hoo Hoh Hoh Hah Hah Haaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!

The French won't do anything...because we are the French and we do nothing except watch Pepe Le Peaux cartoon re-runs and eat pizza. Piss on you Americans and your arrogant ways.

 

Is the US the big boy? From what I remember Russia still has H bombs.
France, why the hell are they on the main council?

 

When you carry the big stick, people kick you in the ass.

 

I remember when I first proposed that the post Cold War US was increasingly getting imperialistic, and adopting a might is right approach to things, I was told that the US was just doing what the free world wanted, and that they were protecting themselves.....Now we're back to the Big Stick Defense, in the face of the rest of the 'free world's rejection of our justification for our proposed actions...I wish it were gratifying, but it's just scary.


Every other, and I mean EVERY OTHER nation which has tried to abuse it's position as the dominant world power (since the formation of the Alliance System to counter the power of Louis XIV's France ) in the face of opposition of it's fellow nations has been termed a tyrant, and eventually opposed in force, to it's downfall....Is that really the road we, the Defenders of Freedom, want to take in the long run? The more we act alone the more we will be.

 

http://www.theonion.com/onion3836/bush_seeks_un_support.html

http://www.theonion.com/onion3838/bush_on_economy.html

 

Kattan: This is my miniature horse, Apples. He was a circus rescue, some disgruntled clowns set fire to some oily rags and burned down the Hoxy Brothers Big Top.

Morgan: I'm Brian Fellows.

Kattan: Hello!

Morgan: That is the biggest dog I've ever seen, what is wrong with that dog?

Kattan: It's not a dog, it's a miniature horse.

Morgan: I wanna see that dog catch a frisbee.

Kattan: Uhh, yeah, he sometimes gets mistaken for a Shetland Pony, but never a dog.

Morgan: Did you see that weird goat?

Kattan: Yes.

Morgan: He had devil eyes. I hope he gone. If that goat is still here, I'm gonna wait outside his dressing room and just kill him, just kill him!

Kattan: That's terrible, killing a poor goat.

Morgan: I'm Brian Fellows.

Kattan: I KNOW THAT, I'M MORTY, AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MY MINIATURE HORSE, APPLES!!!

Morgan: Can I bring your dog with me, to help me trick that goat?
Well, that's all the time we have for today. Join us next time when we'll meet a tree frog. Ahahahahahahahha, a tree frog, that's funny. I'm Brian Fellows.

 

Re: The French...

Yeah...the French...lol...France!...LMAO!...Yeah, what would we want to listen to the French for!?!? LOL! I mean, they're the French! What would they possibly know about the possible repercussions of engaging in a war, especially one which may or may not have justifiable cause...I mean, they're France for God's sake, they haven't been a major power since...er...World War One........heh...er...heh...

 

No matter what happens, I sincerely support you in this post! Godspeed, my good man!

 

I dislike the French more and more with each passing day. They constantly act like they are morally superior to the US and belittle our country. One of my favorite stories about the French took place at the company where I work. This French guy is actually a naturalized US citizen, and he was interviewing MBA candidates in Paris. One of the candidates started going off on and insulting the US, and the US citizen just stopped, stared at him, told him he was in fact a US citizen, and then stopped the interview right there and asked the fool to leave. Eat it Pierre!!!

 

Iraq invaded Kuwait. Iraq lost war. Iraq agreed to weapons inspectors if war would stop. Iraq stops weapons inspectors.

Iraq has broken the deal, not the US.

If Iraq re-agrees to weapons inspectors unconditionally, I'm down with that. That's all the UN has to get Saddam do to stop the US's "imperialistic" nature. Live up to the cease fire agreement, or there is no cease fire. The UN was behind the original deal, but is not behind enforcing it and is siding with the original aggressor.

The US has little to gain by attacking Iraq since there isn't any intention to take it over. We are hurting ourselves economically and not establishing our political rule. The only thing the US is trying to do is prevent an aggressive hostile nation from harming the US and our Allies, again.

When Hitler moved troops into the Rhineland in violation of the Treaty of Versailles, he obviously was just trying to get some breathing room. People don't break Peace Treaties to make Peace.

 

The French have Nukes as well, just felt like educating some of ya'll in here. Why should we take the time and listen to other countries? Well, would we like it if another country wanted to push us aside and tell us that they will do whatever they feel is neccessary? No, we would go to war with a country like that pretty quickly because a country like that is dangerous. I'm not a fan of the French either, but at least they are taking a stand against this ridiculous "Bush Doctrine" and the other things we're trying to do. This Iraq thing should be a political issue the same way it is with North Korea and our main focus should be on breaking up Al Queda and building evidence to prove to the whole world, undeniably, who the backers are.

 

This is nonfactual. But if you repeat it often, you might get other people top believe it too.

 

my memory is short...please tell us how the inspecitions were stopped.

AND WHY.

 

Do you realize how many nations are currently breaking 'deals', including the U.S., or how many are currently violating U.N. resolutions, including Israel? WHen you pick and choose who has to follow what agreements/sanctions, to suit your own wants, and back up those selcetive demands with military force/threats, you are being 'imperialisitc'. Great Britain, France, the U.S.S.R. Rome, the Mongols, etc., etc. all cited reasons for their actions...many included responses to threats, terrorist type attacks, and breaking of agreements.

How do you know that the U.S has no intention of taking over Iraq? Didn't we also say we would leave S.A. as soon as Iraq left Kuwait? And is it possible that setting up a 'US friendly' government modelled after our own just might be to our economic advantage?

Re: breaking 'peace treaties', Hitler et al...Hitler's pursuit of liebensraum wasn't cited about Rhineland...There are many, many examples of 'peace treaties' being broken in alleged pursuit of peace...for example G.B with Napoleon, the U.S. with the Sioux, Apache, etc., the U.S with Panama, etc...

 

An A bomb is nothing compared to a H bomb.

 

LMAO

 

Remember World Wars One and Two? Fought on their soil? Entire generations of French men killed or maimed? 'In Flanders fields the poppies grow/ Beneath the crosses row on row/ that mark their place...' You know, all that. I mean, I think they're kind of pricks now, myself, what with all that nuclear testing in the Pacific and blowing up ships in our harbour and stuff, merci beaucoup mes amis... but their being on the UN Security Council makes a lot of sense, historically.

 

The US told the inspection team that they would be bombing Iraq soon and that they could not guarantee the inspection team's safety. The inspection team left. Us and UK bombed Iraq. Iraq stated that the inspection team was no longer welcome, a shocker!!!