Phoenix Suns' offseason deals don't get bang for their buck

A_3PO · Jan 1, 2011

Shroopy2 said:

Some teams think filling out a roster and having pieces everywhere filling more holes means overall the team is better. Its not always like that in the NBA where premium star power is still a big factor in team performance.

The Suns are better with Amare & Nash + filler than the current roster. Most understandably thought the NBA title ship sailed on the Suns after 6+ seasons never even getting to the Finals. They retooled in another direction but it looks like its already time to blow it up.
Click to expand...

Where are the jokers here who said the Suns wouldn't miss Amare because he was overrated?

smoothie, the Suns had every chance to re-sign Amare and didn't do it. At the same time, the $20 million/year he got from the Knicks was crazy because of the injury risk.

IndoRockets · Jan 1, 2011

Come_Again?! said:

Its too bad Stoudmire left. I believe the Suns could have gotten deep in the playoffs if he would have stayed. A typical Steve Nash, an ageless Grant Hill, explosive J-Rich (when they still had him), good defender/shooter in Dudley and Lopez and Stoudmire clogging up the paint. Not mention Fyre, Childress, and Turoglu, Dragic coming off the bench. Oh well, that's one less team to worry about in the West.
Click to expand...

lol they would have $200 million worth of contracts if they have stoudamire along with Childress, etc

Forums

Phoenix Suns' offseason deals don't get bang for their buck

A_3PO Member

IndoRockets Member

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!