1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

pooping on top of Mt.Everest vs in your basement, which is faster?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Xenochimera, Oct 30, 2010.

?

which poop is faster

  1. you

    20 vote(s)
    30.3%
  2. your twin

    24 vote(s)
    36.4%
  3. the same

    22 vote(s)
    33.3%
  1. Jugdish

    Jugdish Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,072
    Likes Received:
    9,573
    Probably covered already, but time is slower on Mt. Everest than at sea level.
     
  2. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,988
    Likes Received:
    19,926
    The distance from the center of the earth is not enough to affect the speed, the thickness of the air, however, will cause everest poop to fall faster.
     
  3. YaosDirtyStache

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    Messages:
    3,433
    Likes Received:
    656
    Does pooping on an airplane happen faster than in a Subway train? Food for thought.
     
  4. Jontro

    Jontro Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
    Messages:
    36,334
    Likes Received:
    25,485
    Girls don't poop.
     
  5. da_juice

    da_juice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    1,070
    Does the theory of relativity apply to poop? Anyone want to volunteer to try it out?
     
  6. Chopped

    Chopped Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    45
    i was calculating this but got lost when doing the string theory calculations, :-/..
     
  7. SuperBeeKay

    SuperBeeKay Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    6,185
    Likes Received:
    258
    Wouldn't your butthole freeze up in Mt. Everest so therefore, it will never come out so therefore, basement is faster.
     
  8. Mr. Brightside

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    18,964
    Likes Received:
    2,147
  9. Jugdish

    Jugdish Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,072
    Likes Received:
    9,573
    Lack of quantum physicists ITT
     
  10. Skazo

    Skazo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    6
    This question can easily be solved conceptually with the understanding of how distance affects the force of gravity, but I will solve it out completely to find the exact value of the acceleration due to gravity at the top of Mt. Everest.





    Let's start off by using Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation:

    gravitation force = (G*m1*m2) / (r^2)

    where G is the universal gravitational constant, m1 is the mass of the turd, m2 is the mass of the Earth, and r is the distance from the center of Earth to the top of Mt. Everest.

    Because the gravitation force is equal to weight of the turd, and weight = mass times acceleration due to gravity, we can insert (m1*g) into our equation:

    m1*g = (G*m1*m2) / (r^2)

    The "m1"s will cancel out from both sides, leaving us with:

    g = (G*m2) / (r^2)

    Now we can substitute in the values for our variables. G = 6.673 × 10^-11 (m^3) / (kg*s^2). A quick Google search turns up that the mass of the Earth = 5.9742 x 10^24 kilograms, and the distance from the center of Earth to the top of Mt. Everest is approximately 6.3817 x 10^6 meters.

    g = (6.673 × 10^-11)(5.9742 x 10^24) / (6.3817 x 10^6)^2

    g = 9.78877 m/s^2 (acceleration due to gravity at the top of Mt. Everest)

    The accepted value for acceleration due to gravity at sea level is equal to 9.80665 m/s^2.

    ---------

    In conclusion, if we are to ignore air resistance and other factors that might affect the turd in free fall (as mandated by the OP), your twin's turd at ground level will reach the ground faster due to its greater acceleration (9.80665 vs. 9.78877 m/s^2).

    ---------

    The difference in impact times can easily be calculated if the distance between the anus and the ground is provided.
     
    #30 Skazo, Oct 31, 2010
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2010
    3 people like this.
  11. roflmcwaffles

    roflmcwaffles Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,388
    Likes Received:
    113
    Exactly what I was thinking.
     
  12. BetterThanEver

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    9,931
    Likes Received:
    189
    LOL. The twin wins!
     
  13. codell

    codell Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    715
    I remember from that "Everest: Beyond the Limit" show that your digestive system shuts down and doesn't even work at that high altitude.
     
  14. Steve_Francis_rules

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 1999
    Messages:
    8,467
    Likes Received:
    300
    You've got that backwards. Time moves slower when you're closer to the center of the gravitational potential. So in this case, time moves faster on Mt. Everest than at sea level.
     
  15. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,985
    Likes Received:
    36,839
    LOL at the scientific trolling in this thread. Well done.

    Air pressure and general relativity arguments in particular.
     
  16. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,988
    Likes Received:
    19,926
    This might be the greatest post in the history of clutchfans.
     
    1 person likes this.
  17. Depressio

    Depressio Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Messages:
    6,416
    Likes Received:
    366
    You can't assume this, though. Less atmosphere leads to less air resistence, making the mountain poop a little bit faster. Is that faster than the increased magnitude of gravity at sea level? I dunno.
     
  18. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    Its a good analysis except I think you need to factor in that when you are standing on top of Everest you are not just floating in mid air above a smooth sphere of the Earth. The mass of Everest itself affects the local gravity of being on top of Everest.
     
  19. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,770
    Likes Received:
    12,506
    Gravitational force is higher when you are nearer to sea level.
     
  20. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,770
    Likes Received:
    12,506
    No it does not, this is why you weigh less at altitude. I know this because they have all those stupid scales you have to pay 25 cents to use at all the tourist spots in colorado.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now