1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

What if Houston had just offered Lowry 4-years, $18M to start?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by jtagtp, Jul 14, 2010.

Tags:
  1. SmoothOperator

    Joined:
    May 22, 2002
    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    95
    Lowry never would have signed for that low.

    He sees himself as an NBA starting level point guard, and he's probably right. Though, I would like to see him improve the jumper a la Avery Johnson.

    The $18 million would have just been the starting point for the negotiations to go up, which is why the Rockets don't do it that way. Also, a low ball offer might piss someone off more than this route.

    I think the Rockets will match the $24 million. If you use a borderline starter as your back-up PG, then you have to expect to pay that rate.
     
  2. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    Lowry would never take it. Why take it in a market where there's cap space all over the place and he is a solid PG. The cav's are overpaying but how can Morey not pay it after saying we will match no matter what. If they don't match it opens a can of worms for the teams interested in Scola. Besides Lowry is to valuable to this team to let him walk. When Lowry was injured last season we looked bad. The Rockets will not find anyone close to Lowry's level as a replacement. We will be taking a step backward if we let him walk away.

    I actually think losing Lowry might be worst than losing Scola. Not because Scola isn't more valuable but because Patterson brings some things that Scola doesn't and hill is a 4 and not a 5. Okay maybe not worse but Lowry is almost as valuable. His contract is the price you have to pay if you want to compete. Even if that means matching dollar for dollar in luxury tax money. If Les doesn't sign him it proves he wasn't serious about spending whatever it takes this offseason.

    Dan Gilbert's a **** for putting us in this situation. Now I understand why he wrote such a stupid letter. He's a stupid man. Maybe he thinks the Rockets are bluffing. What does he stand to lose to test us. But in the end he won't get Lowry without giving some assets and he just made an enemy. At least I hope that's true. otherwise the Rockets will never be able to use that bluff ever again.
     
  3. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,538
    Likes Received:
    38,763
    Disagree about Scola vs Lowry, but can see your point.

    I don't mind Gilbert doing this at all, it is a business, we can't let emotions get in the way.

    Morey has consistently said he would match for Lowry, so I expect him to match, don't you?

    DD
     
  4. RedRowdy111

    RedRowdy111 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,890
    Likes Received:
    94
    I think $6 mil is about right for the guy. I figured all along, he would recieve at least mle money. I believe he has proven he is the best back-up point guard in the league. He changes the dynamics of what Brooks adds to the team. As DD speculated, I doubt he wants to go to Cleveland. The team is trash now without Lebron, and he is still behind Mo Williams in the depth chart. I think his tweets are being taken out of context. He has been nothing but a professional in his time here, so thinking otherwise, is just gossip.
     
  5. herro

    herro Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,436
    Likes Received:
    23
    how the hell do you take a character limited "tweet" out of context?

    lack of context is the idea and the statements are pointed
     
  6. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,892
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    How do we know the Rockets didn't offer Lowry such a deal and it was just rejected?
     
  7. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    he wasnt going to sign a contract until he got offers from all potential suitors.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. Williamson

    Williamson JOSH CHRISTOPHER ONLY FAN

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    15,787
    Likes Received:
    19,908
    I don't think it would have mattered. We would have put down the offer and that would have just given his agent a starting point for negotiations with other teams. Obviously they were going to explore every option for Kyle regardless. They'd be foolish not to. I'd assume Kyle would have gotten this same offer from the Cavs anyway - and it's possible that it could have even been higher if they began with a stronger bargaining position of already having an offer from the Rockets on the table.

    I sincerely doubt Lowry's agent would have allowed him to simply sign the dotted line as soon as the Rockets offered him a contract without doing their due diligence.
     
  9. slowmustang

    slowmustang Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,325
    Likes Received:
    15
    Wouldn't make a difference at all. All you would be doing is "insulting him" with such a low offer. The agent would take that offer and show to every single team before even thinking about signing an offer.
     
  10. akuma

    akuma Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    978
    Likes Received:
    5
    why does everyone keep on talking about $6 million for Lowry. the real contract is $17 million for three years with a fourth year TEAM OPTION for almost $7 million. they don't have to pay it. the first year starts at a little over $5 million dollars or more than half a million below the MLE or about a little more than what a high lottery rookie makes. people are acting like the Rox signed Lowry for the full MLE for six years which even then isn't that bad of a contract considering that Lowry is still improving and yet to enter his prime.
     
  11. worzel gummidge

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    6,533
    Likes Received:
    150
  12. Yetti

    Yetti Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,589
    Likes Received:
    529
    He would have accepted it! :p
     
  13. Spacemoth

    Spacemoth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    9,901
    Likes Received:
    4,659
    If we started at 4yr/18M, it would have ended up higher 4yr/24M. Like JJ Redick 3yr/20M or something.

    It's a business, nothing more.
     
  14. PeppermintCandy

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,453
    Likes Received:
    2,093
    There's no reason for Lowry to accept Houston's offer outright, especially since he could always go back and accept it later if no other team extends him a better contract as a free agent.

    And since 4-year, $18M is not a huge contract, it would be foolish for Lowry's agent not to see what other offers were out there.
     
  15. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,887
    Likes Received:
    20,033
    LOL, Lowry would have turned it down. If he hadn't, his manager would have told him to turn it down. We just offered a contract to Brad Miller, did he sign it right away? No, he's "weighing his options". Lowry would have done the same thing, Cleveland would have offered him the 4/24 anyway and we'll still be in the same situation.

    The fallout is ridiculous. You guys have no idea how to run a team.
     

Share This Page