1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

2010 Offseason [Trades, Free Agents]

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by ItsMyFault, Apr 14, 2010.

?

Al Jefferson?

  1. Would

    94 vote(s)
    51.9%
  2. Wouldn't

    87 vote(s)
    48.1%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Phillyrocket

    Phillyrocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,486
    Likes Received:
    11,678
    Probably could get Cousins with #5. Not sure if the Kings would do it that contract isn't as bad as say Elton Brand.
     
  2. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,911
    Likes Received:
    13,044
    We can't help but speculate about trading with Sacramento or Memphis, they're on Morey's speed dial.

    The #5 pick in this draft will take a lot to pry away.
     
  3. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,447
    Likes Received:
    5,313
    If we Rockets fans are apprehensive about trading for Biedrins, what makes you think that Morey could simply snap his fingers and trade him if he wanted to? Also, if Biedrins were a free agent this summer and the Rockets had the cap room, do you think Morey would sign Andris to a 4 year, $36M deal? I certainly don't.

    Look, I know that Biedrins would be a good fit as a backup to Yao. But the money simply doesn't work. If Yao turns out to be washed up, the Rockets are screwed big time. With Martin, Biedrins, Scola and a re-signed Brooks, there will not be much room left to pursue a major free agent next summer if they decide to part ways with Yao. And that core simply won't get it done in the Western Conference. Better to pursue a much cheaper (albeit not quite as good) alternative.
     
  4. LongTimeFan

    LongTimeFan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2001
    Messages:
    7,757
    Likes Received:
    963
    If we trade up in this draft for what the front office considers a future star player, this problems seems irrelevant. We're not going to bring in a major FA as is -- the way to do it is through the draft.
     
  5. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,447
    Likes Received:
    5,313
    Uh . . . sure. I think DD was not talking about a Biedrins move in addition to a trade up to grab a future star post player. It was IN LIEU OF such a move.

    Trading up to get a guy like Favors would be great. But it's also not likely.
     
  6. thino

    thino Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    9
    bring carl landry back.
     
  7. KingStevo10

    KingStevo10 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,400
    Likes Received:
    147
    ^^^ Agreed! :grin:
     
  8. Jet036

    Jet036 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    20
    haha we'd be inundated with bigs. We'd be getting Landry+Nocioni+(possibly)Cousins

    TBH I don't like this trade that much. Besides, we'd have to give up a lot more up than you suggested for this trade to go down.
     
  9. RV6

    RV6 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    i'm sure they'd rather work something out with Toronto for Hedo and keep their pick.
     
  10. ryano2009

    ryano2009 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    7,888
    Likes Received:
    5,401
    how bout bringing Carl Landry instead ..? :cool:
     
  11. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,276
    Likes Received:
    39,841

    I agree, I don't think they would pursue a major free agent and would look to go as is....

    If you add Biedrens to the current team sans Yao, they are a 50+ win team, and if Brooks, Martin, Lowry, Hill and Budinger improve, they might be contenders.

    I see your point though.....Biedrens is fairly expensive.....

    DD
     
  12. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,191
    Likes Received:
    3,407
    You DO realize that the Kings are desperate for a big, right? If Cousins or Favors is on the board at #5, we have no chance to trade with them.

    The only trade down scenario for the Kings involve Wesley Johnson being left.
     
  13. Fullcourt

    Fullcourt Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    Messages:
    7,322
    Likes Received:
    2,710
    There's no way we are prying that pick from the Kings. Keep dreaming.
     
  14. Juxtaposed Jolt

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    20,828
    Likes Received:
    16,639
    If anything, the Kings will probably want to trade UP. Cousins might be gone at #2 / #3.
     
  15. rocketblaze

    rocketblaze Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,400
    Likes Received:
    129
    True, I'm kind of hoping the King's fall in love with Greg Monroe(C), forcing Cousins to fall to #6 to the Warriors, making it much easier to obtain him, giving that he wouldn't fit the up tempo style of the Warriors...

    --RB
     
  16. Landry92

    Landry92 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    12
    I dont think they want to get rid of Nacioni that badly ..
     
  17. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,743
    Likes Received:
    22,517
    I honestly believe that with the #5 pick of the draft, Sacramento will probably take a big like Cousins and that could make Landry expendible to them if Cousins pans out. Come trade deadline of next year, expect Morey to make a push to get Landry back at an affordable price give that...

    A. Hill, Draft pick are not producing at a high level off the bench.
    B. Injuries to one or more of our post players.
    C. Sacramento cuts playing time from Landry to give room for #5 pick, Thompson, and Hawes to grow.
     
  18. PinoyRocket

    PinoyRocket Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    34
    no point in getting him unless we have Bud.
     
  19. Garner

    Garner Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,700
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    False. No way Cousins being drafted to play the 5 makes the starting 4, Landry, expendable. That is just silly.

    Having listened to an interview between Bill Simmons and the Kings GM, no way he lets go of Landry. The organization is really high on the team's youth. Landry is a big part of that.
     
  20. RV6

    RV6 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    Are you forgetting about thompson and hawes? Right now landry producess more consistently than either of them. He's got a rebounding issue, but based on scoring and efficiency, Landry has the 4 spot locked up. If anyone is expendable it's gonna be thompson or hawes.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page