1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Tom McClintock - Response to Calderon

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by SunsRocketsfan, May 23, 2010.

  1. SunsRocketsfan

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    6,234
    Likes Received:
    453
    Well said and I couldn't agree more

    <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ldx8gZDwZWs&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ldx8gZDwZWs&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

    McClintockCA04 — May 20, 2010 — Response to President Calderon
    House Chamber, Washington, D.C.
    May 20, 2010

    M. Speaker:

    I rise to take strong exception to the speech of the President of Mexico while in this chamber today.

    The Mexican government has made it very clear for many years that it holds American sovereignty in contempt and President Calderons behavior as a guest of the Congress confirms and underscores this attitude.

    It is highly inappropriate for the President of Mexico to lecture Americans on American immigration policy, just as it would be for Americans to lecture Mexico on its laws.




    It is obvious that President Calderon does not understand the nature of America or the purpose of our immigration law.

    Unlike Mexicos immigration law -- which is brutally exclusionary -- the purpose of Americas law is not to keep people out. It is to assure that as people come to the United States, they do so with the intention of becoming Americans and of raising their children as Americans.

    Unlike Mexico, our nation embraces immigration and what makes that possible is assimilation.

    A century ago President Teddy Roosevelt put it this way. He said:

    "In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language ... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

    That is how we have built one great nation from the people of all the nations of the world.

    The largest group of immigrants now comes from Mexico. A recent RAND discovered that during most of the 20th Century, while our immigration laws were actually enforced, assimilation worked and made possible the swift attainment of the American dream for millions of immigrants seeking to escape conditions in Mexico.

    That is the broader meaning of our nations motto, e pluribus unum from many people, one people, the American people.

    But there is now an element in our political structure that seeks to undermine that concept of E Pluribus Unum. It seeks to hyphenate Americans, to develop linguistic divisions, to assign rights and preferences based on race and ethnicity, and to elevate devotion to foreign ideologies and traditions, while at the same time denigrating American culture, American values and American founding principles.

    In order to do so, they know that they have to stop the process of assimilation. In order to do that, they must undermine our immigration laws.

    It is an outrage that a foreign head of state would appear in this chamber and actively seek to do so. And it is a disgrace that he would be cheered on from the left wing of the White House and by many Democrats in this Congress.

    Arizona has not adopted a new immigration law. All it has done is to enforce existing law that President Obama refuses to enforce. It is hardly a radical policy to suggest that if an officer on a routine traffic stop encounters a driver with no drivers license, no passport, and who doesnt speak English, that maybe that individual might be here illegally.

    And to those who say we must reform our immigration laws I reply that we dont need to reform them we need to enforce them. Just as every other government does. Just as Mexico does.

    Above all, this is a debate of, by and for the American people. If President Calderon wishes to participate in that debate, I invite him to obey our immigration laws, apply for citizenship, do what 600,000 LEGAL immigrants to our nation are doing right now, learn our history and our customs, and become an American. And then he will have every right to participate in that debate.

    Until then, I would politely invite him to have the courtesy while a guest of this Congress to abide by the fundamental rules of diplomacy between civilized nations not to meddle in each others domestic debates.
     
  2. BrotherFish

    BrotherFish Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    28
    100% agree, great response!

    If the conservatives can consistently articulate their arguments just like this, there would be overwhelming support for them.
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    39,217
    Likes Received:
    28,410
    I'm not a fan of Calderon, as I wanted AMLO to win 4 years ago, and I do think Calderon is a hypocrite.
    Our countries thrive on remittances, take that away and that's like a 22% hit for government, so of course Calderon is concerned.

    But I just don't see what the big deal is. It's not like felipe attempted to take over Bank of America or Betty crocker factories. American politicians, for the most part republicans, are notorious for going into other nations and telling them what to do and making a profit while they're at it.
     
  4. coolweather

    coolweather Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,087
    Likes Received:
    58
    I dont know what CAlderon said but everything Tom said makes sense.
     
  5. SunsRocketsfan

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    6,234
    Likes Received:
    453
    well Calderon basically criticized the US and the arizona law and said it was racist against his citizens. While he said this every single one of the lame ass democrats applauded and gave him a standing ovation.

    Yes I know this is a sensitive topic but its obvious there needs to be immigration reform. And I agree everything Tom said makes sense.
     
  6. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    472
    Yeah! How dare that Mexican president come here and tell us how to run our country. Better to overthrow the government and bring "democracy" to the poor slobs!
     
  7. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    I agree pretty much with McClintock.

    I understand why Calderon took that position, but the hypocrisy is downright nauseating.
     
  8. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,138
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    If the Mexico government is capable of improving the economy of Mexico, they would not be asking the United States to take Mexico immigrants. If Mexico is like Canada, do you think Mexicans would be coming to the US in waves?
     
  9. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,941
    Likes Received:
    39,958
    Who wants to do a tipjar bet on whether Calderon has read the bill?

    :p
     
  10. MoonDogg

    MoonDogg Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 1999
    Messages:
    5,167
    Likes Received:
    495
  11. Joshfast

    Joshfast "We're all gonna die" - Billy Sole
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,518
    Likes Received:
    2,186
    That's a left wing version of a typical basso response.

    Come on man, you really think it is OK for the president of Mexico to do what he did? Do you have any American pride left?
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    472
    sorry, I live in New York City

    And do you not think we go into other countries and tell them how they should run their country?

    this is much ado about nothing
     
  13. Rashmon

    Rashmon Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2000
    Messages:
    21,339
    Likes Received:
    18,361
    Anyone else think that McClintock looks a little cross-eyed in that freeze frame?
     

Share This Page