Olbermann - All White People in this country is a RACIST

don't know.. neither do you. no one knows.. remember all the mass graves they found? here is what i do know... Saddam killed an estimated 250,000 Kurds and Shia.

 

are chemical weapons = weapons of mass destruction?

do you believe in what Saddam's men says?

what if majority of them says that there are NO WMDS?

 

so you admit that at the we attacked them, Saddam was not actively killing anymore Kurds. Thanks

and did you purposely ignore my other question?

what was Bush's reasons/justification to congress and American people why should go towar with Iraq?

 

fight the good fight Pops

 

ha... it's funny you should ask that because the term Weapon of Mass Destruction was coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical weapons...
now that you have no cred i will answer your other two questions..
Yes I believe him.. it's amazing that Isreal has intel of it and then this guy comes out and says it.. .hmmmm
and for your third question.. do you have quotes by a majority of them saying their werent? just wondering cause I have this guy and Isreali generals saying they were

 

no i don't admit that saddam wasn't actively killing kurds... no one knows who all he killed.. please don't try and twist my words, it makes you look stupid. and I gave responses to your other question... WMD's were found... and there is much to suggest that others were moved from iraq to syria..

 

we have shown evidence which may be used to support that Bush being a war criminal

can you present any evidence that Obama is a socialist, not a US citizen, and destroying what's good in America?

 

oh my god

 

the question is when were they killed?

were they being killed during the year before we attacked? if so, how many?

so you're willing to put all your money behind Saddam's #2 mans words?

 

can you tell me how the term WMD was coined? please tell me I'm wrong. BTW the more you post the more stupid you make yourself look
•weapon of mass destruction: a weapon that kills or injures civilian as well as military personnel (nuclear and chemical and biological weapons)
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
•generally perceived by the international community to be nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. Weapons of mass destruction, because of their extensive destructive force, are generally reviled by peace activists and are usually subjected to some level of international legal restriction.
www.lib.uconn.edu/~mboyer/ms2001-02glossary.html

NEXT

 

nice.. ok well I was always taught not to argue with people that are obviously not as intelligent as I am. I have provided proof with everything I say and you still continue to ask the same questions.. either you have a learning disability or you are unwilling to see the truth when it is presented to you.. have a good day

 

go ahead run like you did the other threads

1) aside from Rick Santorum, do you have any other sources that WMDs indeed have been found in Iraq
2) do you know what the meaning of degraded is?

3) can you read this and tell me what this means?

 

What? You're the one claiming the expired chemical weapons that were less irritating than consumer grade pepper spray qualified as WMD's. You have no grounds on which to trumpet your superior intelligence.

 

whats the expiration date on chemical weapons? is it stamped on the side? do you have anything backing up your consumer grade pepper spray claim...
This is true even considering any degradation of the chemical agents that may have occurred, Chu said. It's not known exactly how sarin breaks down, but no matter how degraded the agent is, it's still toxic.

"Regardless of (how much material in the weapon is actually chemical agent), any remaining agent is toxic," he said. "Anything above zero (percent agent) would prove to be toxic, and if you were exposed to it long enough, lethal." from the article i linked

 

CHOOSE ONE: CAN'T READ OR NO CRED

 

shows how well you read.. the article i linke was from Defense.gov and was written by By Samantha L. Quigley. It quotes Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and Army Col. John Chu who I'm sure know WAY more about WMD's and Chemical weapons than you do..
my favorite quote...
"These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee.

 

choose one: can't read or no cred

 

there's checmical weapons and there's WMD's that Bush & company suspected Iraq was actively developing to justify sacrificing thousands of american lives and billions of US tax paers money

 

if you look at the dates on my article and the other article you quote at the bottom, you'll notice that my article is newer than yours and therefore a change of heart must have happened by the NGIC... also it's nice to see how you refuse to admit that chemical weapons arent wmd's.. any anwer on that? was i right?

 

should say "are WMD's" not a typist... but you should know I'm right by now.. i've provided you way to many documents that define chemical weapons as WMDs.. and I can provide the
International Law, Security, and Weapons of Mass Destruction
by
Jayantha Dhanapala
Under-Secretary-General for Disarmament Affairs
United Nations
that also states as much if you'd like