1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The Rockets 2 Superstars: not who you think

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by smoothie, Dec 19, 2009.

  1. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    much praise has been given to "scolandry" while comparing their combined average to that of superstar forwards and centers around the league.

    i'd like to turn your attention to the "lowrooks" combination.

    PPG: 26.5
    APG: 10.2
    RPG: 5.6
    SPG: 2.04
    3%: .352
    FG%: .430
    TO: 5.07

    of course i'd like to see the turnovers brought down. closer to 4 would be really nice. lowry has really worked on his long range game and its earning him more minutes IMO, while brooks has become a decent play maker. like scolandry these two guys have worked on improving their respective weaknesses to the point where it doesn't seem that there is a clear cut starter and reserve, rather a 2 headed monster that causes a lot of problems for everyone else in the league.

    the rockets get all-star production from the PF and PG positions. i believe that to be a big reason why they have been able to survive without yao and tmac. the rockets 2 superstars this season: scolandry and lowrooks (unless someone comes up with a better name for the PG combo!)
     
    #1 smoothie, Dec 19, 2009
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2009
  2. No Chance

    No Chance Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2000
    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    133
    They are also a blast to watch play!! This is the most enjoyable team in a long time!
     
  3. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,218
    Likes Received:
    3,429
    Lowrooks also average 59 minutes a game. I want to see superstars top that! Amazingly enough, that's actually higher than Scolandry's 55 mpg.

    Per 40 minutes, their stats

    PPG: 17.9
    APG: 6.9
    RPG: 3.8
    SPG: 1.38
    3%: .352
    FG%: .430
    TO: 3.43

    Pretty good, but hardly overwhelming.
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Lovemachine2000

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    370
    How about"Micro-Broowry?" :grin:
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. VooDooPope

    VooDooPope Love > Hate

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 1999
    Messages:
    9,244
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Brooks starts so he should come first so it would have to be Browry.
     
  6. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,498
    Likes Received:
    40,065
    Lowrooks is bad.

    Browry is good.

    Micro-Broowry for the win !

    DD
     
    #6 DaDakota, Dec 19, 2009
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2009
  7. ico4498

    ico4498 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    3,769
    Likes Received:
    1,516
    i like
     
  8. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,900
    Likes Received:
    16,454
    Brooks and Lowry play a lot of minutes on the floor together, so I don't think it makes sense to just add up their stats like that. A weighted average of their per-minute stats would give a better idea of their combined production:

    Per 36 minutes it is:
    16.2 ppg
    6.2 apg
    3.4 rpg
    1.3 spg
    3.1 tpg
    15.9 PER

    Not really elite production, but solid.
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,800
    Likes Received:
    41,241
    I'll drink to that! :cool:
     
  10. Strawman

    Strawman Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    6
    Brooks averages 18ppg alone in 34 mins...so...
     
  11. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,900
    Likes Received:
    16,454
    If Brooks/Lowry were combined into a single player that plays about 36 minutes a game, the "Brooks" part of that combination would not be playing 34 minutes. More like 20.
     
  12. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    Micro-Broowry is awesome!

    also, sorry for simply combining their stats, but math was never my best subject and you guys got the point anyway :cool:
     
  13. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    16,256
    Likes Received:
    2,039
    Didnt think we'd have Micro Broowry as the superstar nickname over Scolandry.
     
  14. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,873
    Likes Received:
    3,222

    You mean 'Browery', of course. ;)
     
  15. TMac4Life#1

    TMac4Life#1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,104
    Likes Received:
    15
    Micro-Browrey would be 3 people wouldn't it?? Micro meaning t-mac
     
  16. htownfan_9210

    htownfan_9210 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    how about brookry
     
  17. Dr of Dunk

    Dr of Dunk Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 1999
    Messages:
    46,648
    Likes Received:
    33,664
    Thank you for pointing out the obvious. :grin:
     
  18. Uprising

    Uprising Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2000
    Messages:
    43,089
    Likes Received:
    6,640
    I am actually dreading the return of Yao and Mac to a point.....

    This team is soooo much fun to watch. Run and gun style! No more sluggish offense! :cool:
     
  19. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,051
    I'm dreading Yao and Mac's return because they might not be who we thought they were...

    You're onto something... Repped
     
  20. caneks

    caneks Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,473
    Likes Received:
    226
    .43 FG% is just ok. Considering the TO and the high FGA, I don't like the performance. We need to feed the ball inside to improve offensive efficiency.
     

Share This Page