Well this thread has taken a turn and one for the better, IMO. I am still skeptical and think it is one big hoax but whoever you are (talking to the op), you are doing a brilliant job in achieving this thread to be 12 pages long. But the biggest reason I call BS is common sense tells you that if you are "hawt" enough to make it as a power dancer then you shouldn't even be asking this question (I know that I am contradicting myself because a couple of pages ago I thought it might be plausible for this question to be asked if this thread was really legit but that was early in the morning). Looking sexy to a power dancer is something that should require no thought and the reason being is what I call the "Burlap Theory". I am sure that I am not the first person to come up with this but here it goes: Take a woman's looks (which includes everything such as face, body, hair, etc.) and make that your x-axis and then on the y-axis, have outfits or clothing. My theory basically is this: A woman that is extremely good-looking doesn't need to wear as sexy or as slinky of an outfit compared to a woman who is not. However, an average looking woman who is wearing tight clothing, halter tops, leather pants, etc. can push herself to be as hot as Scarlett Johansen wearing sweat pants and a sweatshirt. But if Scarlett decides to wear the same outfit as our average woman than Scarlett is going to get the most passes or stares from heterosexual guys if you are following me. On your x-axis, this is the woman's look. For simplicity's sake, let's say that a "1" is the lowest and that would be someone who looks like Sandra Bernhard and a "10" is the highest and that would be someone who looks like Scarlett Johansen. As for the y-axis, a "1" would be a burlap sack while a "10" would be my outfit that I talked about earlier - tight black sweater with wool mini and black boots (but it can really be anything that you find incredibly sexy). If you graph the line, starting with the ugliest female but dressed the sexiest, you will see that it is a diagonal straight line that is decreasing or has negative slope - meaning that your dogs or godawfully ugly women HAVE to dress at the "10" on the y-axis to even get noticed by a guy, while a Scarlet Johansen can wear the burlap sack and although lower than the ugly girl she is still well to the right of the y-axis. I would think that an average Rockets power dancer would be an 8 on the scale, maybe even a 9 (sorry but 10's are hard to come by as they should be). So, using the theory, they could wear a sweatshirt and sweatpants (which might be like a 3 or 4 on the y-axis) and still be "hawter" than an ugly girl that is wearing a miniskirt and stilletto heels. The great thing about this theory is that a woman can "marginally" make herself a little more attractive and thus push herself farther to the right on the x-axis by curling her hair, wearing more make-up (if need be), wearing a push-up bra, losing weight, etc. So after all of this, the bottom line is that if the op is really a power dancer, all you have to do is wear normal clothing and you will have guys notice you due to the theory. Now if you look like Sandra Bernhard, then you will have to dress to kill to get any looks but you wouldn't be a power dancer if that was the case. And this whole theory came to me while I was waiting in the doctor's office.
Yes, that's the only thing convincing me there's still a 1% chance this is real. Bcuz she types lik shes txtng sum1. And 2 many hot 20 yr oldz still do it bcuz their (intentional sp) stil getng by on their looks n spend their whole day txtng insted of skool or wrk. U shud c my resume!
dear power dancer mystery lady, Please never ever wear Ug Boots at work or anywhere else. That will be a big plus for you, and the planet in general. Thank you!
I say as long as the guy isn't married then he is fair game. Not a skanky move. Everyone is down for an upgrade. It's a natural selection type thing. My rule is that everyone is fair game unless they have on a ring. And the other girls in this thread are acting pretty standard as they would in real life. I think when men get on the internet, they act different than they do in person (like jackasses), but girls are pretty much girls on the net and in real life - competing with other girls.
Which is why I can't believe that someone who is confident enough to try out and be selected as a power dancer doesn't have the confidence to pick out her own wardrobe in order to attract a guy at work. We aren't talking rocket science here... she should know what looks good on her and what doesn't. Maybe we need to send those "what not to wear" people to the op so she can wear the most flattering clothes to catch her man.
What if she just wants to stand out from the other dancers? "Her" work environment is different than most. Anyways, I'm not sure why anyone would bs about something so trivial.
Hehe, what can I say? I have been told that I am very observant to those types of things. One other thing I will add, call it an addendum (promise it won't be as long as the last post) but I have found that most women who dress real sexy in the workplace do it to get attention and/or get noticed by someone. Occasionally, you will have someone who just dresses like that because that is their style - sexy to guys and borderline slut to women. But if you start to notice some ordinary, even ugly girl wearing outfits that are out of the norm for her (like spiked heels when she has always worn *shudder* flip flops or wears skirts all the time after wearing pants) or she wears her hair different like curls it or has dyed it, etc or has lost weight (a huge red flag), she is trying to get a man. This is especially true for women who are either going through a divorce or are contemplating an affair whether the woman is married or not.
im used to getting attn all the time and the other dancers read this post to see what people say about us for fun, this guy is seriously ignoring me and avoiding me, that is the only reason i asked all yall
I'm going to need to see a lot more supporting material, particularly visual information, to verify your theory.
What if you we're dating a power dancer? Is she still a w****? I say yes, unless you knew her before she was a power dancer. I can type like the OP too. Believe me, I am a noob who doesn't use the internets much i better stop capitalizing and stop using grammatical punctuations damnit i am better than this!
