1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Is it time for the Rockets to make a deal with the Devil?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by rockets934life, Nov 11, 2009.

  1. Naija Texan

    Naija Texan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,043
    Likes Received:
    55
    But ultimately right now, we don't need any superstars.

    Right now, we are developing Ariza, Brooks, Budinger and Landry to possibly be our future players which means, adding a superstar now, will make for a mess later on, should they grow into legit all star caliber players within the next year and a half.

    Going into the season, I think most didn't expect much from this Rockets team, I think we should definitely go forward with our current set without needing to worry about major talent until the off season.
     
  2. texascityman31

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    6
    Incoming Players
    Andres Nocioni
    6-7 SF from Argentina (Foreign)
    11.1 ppg, 3.8 rpg, 1.0 apg in 25.5 minutes
    Beno Udrih
    6-3 PG from Slovenia (Foreign)
    12.3 ppg, 2.3 rpg, 3.6 apg in 28.1 minutes
    Kevin Martin
    6-7 SG from Western Carolina
    30.6 ppg, 5.4 rpg, 2.6 apg in 41.7 minutes
    Kenny Thomas
    6-7 PF from New Mexico
    2.0 ppg, 4.2 rpg, 0.5 apg in 11.9 minutes
    Outgoing Players
    Chase Budinger
    6-7 SF from Arizona
    10.3 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 1.6 apg in 18.9 minutes
    Carl Landry
    6-8 PF from Purdue
    15.6 ppg, 5.4 rpg, 0.5 apg in 25.2 minutes
    Tracy McGrady
    6-8 SG / SF from Mount Zion Christian Academy (HS)
    No games yet played in 2009-2010
    Brian Cook
    6-9 PF from Illinois
    0.0 ppg, 0.3 rpg, 0.0 apg in 2.7 minutes
    Sacramento Trade Breakdown
    Change in Team Outlook: -30.1 ppg, -6.7 rpg, and -5.6 apg.


    Ok check out our future after this trade. 2010-2011 NBA season (minutes per game).

    PF - Scola (28mpg)

    SF - Ariza (28mpg)

    C - Yao (30mpg)

    SG - Martin (35mpg)

    PG - Brooks (30mpg)

    Bench:

    PG - Lowry (18mpg)

    SG/SF - Battier (26mpg)

    SF/PF - Nocioni (18mpg)

    PF - Hayes (14mpg)

    C - Anderson (13mpg)

    Draft Pick

    PG - Udrich
     
  3. FR0497

    FR0497 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    40
    If we have the chance to get a superstar this season we need to take it. You don't wait a year and a half hoping one of your players turns into one. Imo, the 4 you listed will never be all star players.
     
  4. Seth

    Seth Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,741
    Likes Received:
    25
    I like the idea of the OP, i just don't think GS would accept that trade.
    The only way to get GS to bite is if somhow they would be interested in having the full expiring contract. Then we could ask them what to part with.

    I don't believe we need a couple of superstars as some mentioned. SA has been champion with Ginobili and Parker, which are stars, but not Superstars.

    I think Jacskon can fill tha role, and Brooks, Scola or Landry can all become the other borderline star we need.
     
  5. postaboi713

    postaboi713 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    343


    the hell is wrong you :confused:
     
  6. megastahr

    megastahr Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,389
    Likes Received:
    1,326
    I think we are showing off our assets which we have a TON...and I think we should ONLY settle for a disgruntled superstar....like Bosh or Paul.

    I mean good chance bosh leaves with raptors sucking it up...we could prob get him...do a 3 way trade with Toronto send scola and martin to toronto we get bosh and bad contracts kings get draft picks cap relief and young talent like Jermaine Taylor.

    Or with all the problems with chris paul...who better to trade with them than us? We can eat crappy pejas contract and give them Lowry or brooks to fill the HUGE voide Paul will leave...give them cap space...draft picks and there choice of Cs, PFs, or SFs.

    I dont know what but I see another Tmac type deal. Just think of the lowry deal...were sitting here say get steven jackson and Keven martin would be incriminatol at best....

    and then he goes and trades alston for a younger better pg...no other GMs make moves like that....way off the radar.

    ITs always a veteran player in the last year of his contract or overpaid bad contract...never a great young high upside player for your old veteran ...just realize who we got pulling the strings......wow this was way too long for this early in the am...
     
  7. blactrs2

    blactrs2 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    SJAX is a better player than ariza. SJAX, as crazy as he is, is a complete player. he's a better shooter, and equal defender, he's just better. now i dont know about bringing him over. but if he can keep his mouth shut he'd be a great addition. i like the tradesimply bc i think he wouldnt complain as much here, with a group of guys that work, play D, and a good coach. i think he'd fit just like artest did. how can you come here and complain with the lineup we currently have and the way those guys leave it all on the floor every night
     
  8. HPD

    HPD Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,287
    Likes Received:
    19

    classic !!
     
  9. Naija Texan

    Naija Texan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,043
    Likes Received:
    55
    The problem lies in the same reason the Rockets didn't make a move at all for Artest. We are thinking LONG TERM, not quick fixes. Jackson isn't a young player, so we might not be guaranteed to have him at his best as long as we could potential have Ariza nor are we likely to have him be as malleable to coaching in different things.


    As for any other potential trade, I'd rather if we are losing McGrady not to lose one of other quality players in the mix which a lot of these trade proposals seem intent on doing.
     

Share This Page