See.. you can't go by it like that.. that was just on one drive... the defense picked up after that... you can't just base it on a small part of the game.. the defense was played heavily on both sides... yeah Bradford could've made more plays with the football than Landry... but that doesn't mean they would've just won.
Possibly, yes. What are YOU saying, that you can give some kind of cosmic divine guarantee that OU would have won the game if Bradford played the whole time? Hope you're not a gambler.
No, but being that I am a Sooner fan, I am actually quite happy with the outcome of the game, considering we were able to stand toe-to-toe with Texas without our best player.
Well I think that they would have, agree to disagree. And thanks for calling me an idiot for disagreeing with you, it speaks volumes to your maturity level.
A win is a win - good for UT. Sorry to see Bradford hurt. The biggest problem with this game is that between turnovers and penalties it wasn't a great showcase for the Big 12. It was billed as being the "Game Of The Week" and looked sloppy and played slow.
It's pretty much guaranteed anyways that if Texas goes undefeated that they'll be in that title game... unless the computers get them. But they should be good in the human polls.
Ouch...at least give me suited connectors.......am in a hold em tourney tonight....won the last two......so am feeling good about my game. DD
Florida is not looking good at all. Possible Arkansas upset. Also, its 3:56 PM and UT still doesn't have an impressive win this season.