I was watching another Thread about KT and DREw for Kandi man and Nesby I like this Trade because. . IS THERE ANY REASON CATO CANNOT PLAY PF The buiser PF we need/want 'Los then is the Softer swifter PF off the bench A nice pick up at SF and the Squad is 2-deep everywhere C - Kandi/Cato/Pig PF - Cato/ los/Tmass SF - Walt/ new SF/ bull SG - Shan/ Cat PG - Francis/Drew [13 players . . .] I don't know about you but the Offense is backcourt heavy but the defense is very Tall Frontline [Kandi on Shaq with Cato on the Weak side would not be all that bad] Rocket River ------------------
I quite like the idea of having two talls in the rotation at the same time, but Cato has a couple of strikes against him as a PF a) He wil have a lot of trouble defending mobile PFs (like Garnett) b) You really like you PFs to be a valid low post threat. The only threat Cato poses from the low post is that he will miss dunks. ------------------ http://rocketdavo.tripod.com
Davo How many teams have a dominant Center and PF? closest thing is Spurs. maybe Webber and Divac Garnett would be a jump shooter because if he gets around Kevin he has to contend with Kandi. [Plus 'Los could get nice minutes at SF] I think our frontline would be above average. Rocket River ------------------
THat would be fine but one of them would have to be able to hit a jumper once in a while. Every team that has ever played two big guys and been successful relied on one of them having some offensive game besides putbacks and alley-oops. Neither Cato or Kandi has enough game to put them both in the lineup at the same time. Another thing is that the best way to stop a good offense is to make them play D. That lineup would allow the other teams big men to catch their breath on defense. Nice try though. ------------------
