1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Champion Ford Ad: Legal?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Fatty FatBastard, Aug 26, 2009.

Tags:
  1. Fatty FatBastard

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    15,916
    Likes Received:
    159
    Was just driving back from lunch, and I heard that Champion had so much success with the "cash for clunkers" program that they had a ton of used inventory, and would rather sell them for CHEAP!!! rather than dispose of them, and the savings is passed to you!

    Last I checked, ALL cars that qualified for the program had to be destroyed.

    Thoughts? Am I missing something?
     
  2. MiddleMan

    MiddleMan Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,298
    Likes Received:
    271

    That would be illegal all the way.
     
  3. Ron from the G

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    77
    It's probably just a marketing ploy.
     
  4. Fatty FatBastard

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    15,916
    Likes Received:
    159
    Actually, it would be false advertising.
     
  5. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,414
    Likes Received:
    9,359
    From a car dealership??? No way.
     
  6. bnb

    bnb Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    6,992
    Likes Received:
    316
    It's their inventory of pre-clunkers used cars. Fewer buyers because their potential customers got upsold to new and improved cars. So it's your chance to Save Save Save. But act fast. This is a limited time offer.
     
  7. JJ

    JJ Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    6
    Radio ads?? Upgrade to satellite radio.. no commercials. There's your answer.
     
  8. Special Patrol Group

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2000
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    5
    They have a mile of cars to choose from.
     
  9. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    they could have a ton of inventory because people purchased new cars, rather than buying used.
     
  10. Colt45

    Colt45 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2000
    Messages:
    3,230
    Likes Received:
    3,011
    Some of Kurt Russell's best work.

    Kudos.
     
  11. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    Did they literally say this part, or did you infer it?
     
  12. Fatty FatBastard

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    15,916
    Likes Received:
    159
    I'll have to listen again to the exact wording, but it sure sounded like that to me. I heard it on 610, BTW.
     
  13. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,427
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    Seems pretty clear that they're saying they have more used cars because people who traded in their clunkers were forced to buy new cars...
     
  14. Fatty FatBastard

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    15,916
    Likes Received:
    159
    Did you hear the ad? Hopefully I'll get a chance to listen again.
     
  15. Vanilla Rice

    Vanilla Rice Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    15
    They probably sold zero used cars during c-f-c. Now they are getting hit for interest on these units (being month-end) and so they want them off the lot as fast as possible.
     
  16. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    I guess if they file the paperwork for cash for clunkers they could still resell the traded in car. Of course then they would also have to swallow the $4,500 that the government would've reimbursed them.
     
  17. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,427
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    I have not heard the ad, but I still think it's clear what they're getting at. I happened to use the state program (AirCheck) to get a car a couple of weeks ago, and there were several times throughout the purchasing process that employees at the dealership mentioned how their used car sales had been negatively affected by the popularity of the rebate programs.

    Granted, I could see how one might misinterpret the ad initially, but when you stop and think about it I don't see how one could still think they were trying to sell "clunkers".
     
  18. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,427
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    You and the dealer have to sign paperwork saying that all parts of the car that are related to emissions will be destroyed (engine, air filter, intake manifold, exhaust, fuel system, etc.). There is no reselling allowed at all. That would defeat the purpose of the program completely.
     
  19. Yonkers

    Yonkers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    8,433
    Likes Received:
    480
    I think Sishir's point is that if they wanted to, they could just keep the clunker and not file paperwork for reimbursement of the $4500 from the government. It would be treated like any other trade-in they normally get on a car sale.
    Nothing illegal as long as they don't try to get the $4500 credit AND resell the car.
     
  20. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,427
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    Well, that doesn't make much sense anyway. Why would anyone have traded in a car under the cash for clunkers program that was worth more than $4,500? They would have just done a regular trade in for the cars actual value. Sure, a dealer can take a $3,000 trade in and sell it for, say $5,000, but they'll have to put man hours into checking it over and restoring it for resale. Rather pointless if you ask me. They'd just take the $4,500 credit.

    But that's a moot point, I would think. The government wouldn't leave such an obvious loophole in the plan, even if it's largely pointless.
     

Share This Page