Why would you want to trade an injury prone player who has a large expiring contract for another injury prone player whose contract runs him for another 2 or 3 years?? There basically clones.
And to count, Tmac's missed 109 games over the last 4 seasons. So saying they're "basically clones" is a bit of a hyperbole. VC has been in the league one less season than Tmac so you could say less wear on him, but Tmac's missed a season's worth of games.
Not just Toronto. He's deadly when it comes to clutch. He can nail shots from anywhere on the court. And to top it off, very accurate shots that only hit twine and no iron. The man swishes every shot.
Depends, maybe on the trade deadline. The Nets might want to free up cap space and if their record is not going anywhere by then, then VC could be a Rocket. It also depends on the Rockets. If by then, the record is promising and Tmac is at least 80% and contributing then say no to VC.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/YjBzZpkuy38" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> he's the anti tmac, he still plays in the NBA <iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/5u3QEOibu8g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>