Nation Desperately Seeks Sportswriters' Opinions On Kobe Bryant

jminges · Jun 12, 2009

The Onion: Nation Desperately Seeks Sportswriters' Opinions On Kobe Bryant

Excerpts:

Basketball enthusiasts claim sportswriters have repeatedly helped them to determine whether Bryant is a better defender than most people think, and whether he has figured out how to use his teammates instead of being a me-first player. In 2009 alone, tens of thousands of basketball fans have called on sports journalists to answer the following questions: Is Kobe Bryant intense? Is Kobe Bryant competitive by nature? Does Kobe Bryant have a deep and abiding passion for the game of basketball? And if so, how do his intensity, competitive nature, and passion compare to Michael Jordan's?

Citizens claim that if they are not given at least 40,000 more sports columns concerning these topics, they will be utterly unable to comprehend even a single minute of a basketball game.
Click to expand...

"I was personally unsure whether Kobe was 'focused' or not," Baltimore resident Michael Shields said. "But then I read Jonathan Abrams' lengthy New York Times article about Kobe Bryant's focus and I learned that Kobe is really very focused indeed. Now, I had thought that Kobe certainly looked focused during his 40-point performance in Game 1, but you can never be sure of these things until it's confirmed by a professional."
Click to expand...

Fans have also turned to sportswriters to help them understand whether or not Bryant is hungry for a fourth championship ring. A survey of hundreds upon thousands of nearly identical but equally brilliant sports columns—penned by many different writers—and painstaking viewings of ESPN's Around the Horn have confirmed that Bryant is, in fact, metaphorically hungry for said ring.

"After three championships, I was thinking that maybe he didn't want or need a fourth," said Los Angeles resident Derrick Glass, who has had season tickets to the Lakers for the last 15 years. "To be honest, I thought that maybe he only wanted to win with Shaquille O'Neal and didn't really feel like proving that he could win a title without him, but fortunately Jay Mariotti and Woody Paige are paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to steer me in the right direction on that one."
Click to expand...

"To get a full grasp on Kobe, I need Skip Bayless to yell at the top of his lungs," Michael Shields of Cincinnati said. "After he shouts about Kobe as often as possible while fixing a sour look of disdain on his self-important face, I will know what I myself should think about Kobe."

Most importantly, citizens stressed they need sportswriters to tell them precisely where Bryant stands amongst the all-time greats. Americans unanimously noted that it is absolutely necessary for sportswriters to provide them with the invaluable service of writing 600,000 to 1 million more columns that rank current and past players in lists of 10, 20, or 100, depending upon how much space their editors need to fill.

"I could never do what these guys do," Tom Matthews, 34, said. "But what I find most moving is when they sum up these apparently inconsequential stories with poignant closing sentences, often just a few seemingly inane words—or perhaps even a separated quote that's given its own standalone closing paragraph—intended to make the reader ignore the previous 872 words of mindless filler and take a moment to think about sports' overall influence on who, ultimately, we are as a nation and a culture."
Click to expand...

tofu-- · Jun 12, 2009

LOLLLLLLLL

The Onion is great.

Omer · Jun 12, 2009

I thought the article was going to be dumb but then I actually read it and it was quite amusing.

mazyar · Jun 12, 2009

Ranking players and putting them in order of greatness is plain stupid. Specially if it's players from different decades or eras.

It's kind of like ranking you against your past and present co-workers. It's dumb. You can't say, "Joe is definitely a better worker and Bob cause he types 60 words per minute compared to 50."

Tb-Cain · Jun 12, 2009

mazyar said:

It's kind of like ranking you against your past and present co-workers. It's dumb. You can't say, "Joe is definitely a better worker and Bob cause he types 60 words per minute compared to 50."
Click to expand...

Exactly! Bob might be clutch in those last few words per minute....

JuanValdez · Jun 12, 2009

Joe was working with a computer keyboard and Bob was using a freakin' typwriter! If Bob was in a modern office environment with the ergonomic keyboards and whatnot, he'd blow Joe out of the water!

Forums

Nation Desperately Seeks Sportswriters' Opinions On Kobe Bryant

jminges Member

tofu-- Member

Omer Member

mazyar Member

Tb-Cain Member

JuanValdez Member

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!