1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Sessions Will Test Free Agency

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by FLASH21, May 28, 2009.

  1. W22_STREAK

    W22_STREAK Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,008
    Likes Received:
    616
    mate...a 6'3 PG.

    MY FAVOURITE PG IN THE WHOLE LEAGUE.

    I WANTED US TO GET SESSIONS SOOO BAD SINCE LAST SEASON...

    THIS IS OUR CHANCE.
     
  2. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,217
    Likes Received:
    14,657
    Realistically only if he wants to sign for the MLE with a guarantee that the Bucks won't match.(Highly unlikely IMO). A Wafer plus Lowry exchange for Sessions won't be enough,but that's the best DM can offer them without shaking the team.
     
  3. GOAT

    GOAT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,312
    Likes Received:
    1
    i would give up Brooks, Landry, Cook, barry and Tracy to them. Just send me back Sessions, Villanueva, gadzuric and Redd back. That would give sessions about 4 million a year and villanueva around 5 to 6 million, for 3 years. That would be your back up center, pg, and scoring wing solved. All you must do is sign Ron and Wafer back.

    That would give the Bucks salary cap relief and young players with upside also in Brooks and Landry.

    Sessions, Lowry
    Redd, Wafer, White
    Shane, Ron
    Scola, Villanueva, Hayes
    Yao, Gadzuric, Dorsey

    That would actually add scoring, defense, and rebounding to a team that took the western conference champions to 7. I like our chances with this lineup.

    Oh yeah by the way we might want to trade Brooks before his value goes down, because it will go down. I think drich has said something about this and I must agree with him totally (look at luther head). I think Morey is smart enough to know this unlike Dawson.

    Also doing this will not age us to bad either we could compete for the next 3 years at least
     
  4. drowsy11

    drowsy11 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    1
    would ron resign to be a backup?
     
  5. larsv8

    larsv8 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,916
    Thats a pretty strong lineup. I would probably do it. Id prefer to keep Brooks over Lowry though.
     
  6. AB#0

    AB#0 Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    1
    I would hate to see Lowry go but if we could bring in Sessions that would be an upgrade at the point. Plays defense, can score and be a playmaker. AB off the bench would prolly be better because he can just play freely and push the ball without Yao.
     
  7. GOAT

    GOAT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,312
    Likes Received:
    1
    yeah but you have to give something in order to get something and it really is a nice lineup
     
  8. Chamillionaire

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,792
    Likes Received:
    2,527
    do we have enough dough to sign von, ron, and sessions? no.
     
  9. GOAT

    GOAT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,312
    Likes Received:
    1
    that's why you do the trade i proposed. then you are just swapping money more than anything. may have to a couple of million
     
  10. Chamillionaire

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,792
    Likes Received:
    2,527
    ok, i'm all for it, but are the bucks? i highly doubt it.
     
  11. GOAT

    GOAT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,312
    Likes Received:
    1
    Bucks are trying to shave money well they would be moving Redd, and Gadzuik . At the sametime they would be getting a young pg back along with Landry (hometown boy as well as a young PF). All of this with getting back expiring contracts. Win win for both teams. They are losing a young pg but also getting back a young pg. That is why I said we can't send Lowry over, don't think they bite on that
     

Share This Page