It wasnt very close but 2nd is still second 104 to 7 Thats the votes of Rogers' to Mobley's Lets just hope this doesnt mean Francis is a Runner up too ------------------ DR
I think we all saw this coming.... ------------------ HOOP-T Hey Shaq, Acme called, and they want their bricks back!
Player MPG FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A REB APG STL BLK TO PTS PPG Cuttino Mobley 30.8 437-1016 104-292 299-353 3.6 2.6 87 32 186 1277 15.8 Rodney Rogers 27.9 428-881 115-262 159-249 5.5 2.1 94 47 163 1130 13.8 <a href="www.nba.com/playerindex.html">NBA.com Player Index</a> (I hope that turns out okay ) Mobes was robbed, there is no way that there can realistically be a difference of 97 votes when looking at the stats. I think the figures speak for themselves. Maybe Mobes was second to Rogers (Did I just type that?!?) But NO WAY IN HELL by 97 votes!! P.S I'm sure we all know that Mobes was robbed, but I just had to voice my total displeasure for this injustice!!! ------------------ C'mon, lets get Chuck that ring. [This message has been edited by Chuck04 (edited May 01, 2000).] [This message has been edited by Chuck04 (edited May 01, 2000).]
Well, if you believe someone is second to someone else, then even if it's by 100% of the votes, it's correct. If you believe that maybe Rogers is better, then why shouldn't everybody else? Get it? ------------------ ?
Doc, That may be so, but my point is that the figures are close enough for Mobes to get more than 7 votes. A difference of 97 would suggest that Rogers was a lot better than Cat, which is not true. ------------------ C'mon, lets get Chuck that ring.
