1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Should Wafer close games?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by ai_111, Mar 15, 2009.

  1. ai_111

    ai_111 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    3
    We all know that in the 4th quarter, we struggle and I am sure that Adelman is doing his best to find a solution to that problem. Defensively, we are okay, it s offensively that we struggle. Outside Yao, Wafer is our best offensive player and time after time, he has show us that he is very clutch.
    On the other hand, Battier is a liability on the offense. Teams double Yao and Battier cant hit anything.
    What about finishing with Wafer? He can change things. Adelman should atleast try it once.
     
  2. DcProWLer277

    DcProWLer277 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    20
    He's unproven, one year does not a man make, that's why we go to Yao or Artest down the stretch.
     
  3. Convictedstupid

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    4,963
    Likes Received:
    512
    In the past few games, every time we needed a big shot to get us going in the 4th and wafer had the ball, he made it.


    I say let him close.
     
  4. topfive

    topfive CF OG

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    19,838
    Likes Received:
    39,462
    I disagree. Sure, we struggle offensively, but I think the Rox get offensive brain freeze and psych themselves into struggling. If they instead concentrated on turning the defense up a notch, they'd not only relax on the offensive end, they'd probably get some steals and/or easy transition scores.
     
  5. ai_111

    ai_111 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    3
    He has hit many clutch shots, like the Boston game. Also, in the Lakers game, he was the only one at the end that could score. Battier is doing anything on the offense. I am sure that he can help in the 4th quarter.
    Wafer has prove that he can play well in the end of the games.
     
  6. OlajuwonShake34

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    746
    Likes Received:
    0
    I def. rather have Wafer close the game out than Aaron Brooks. I'd rather have Yao close it out, but If I was asked to give a choice for the 2nd guy it would be Wafer.
     
  7. ai_111

    ai_111 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sure Yao should be the first option.I am saying that we should have Wafer instead of Battier in the end of the games. What you think about that?
     
  8. jondoe

    jondoe Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,031
    Likes Received:
    2
    yep I agree. put brooks in with Wafer, artest, Yao, and either Shane or Scola. Wafer has the athleticism to take it to the rim. His decision making has been getting better.
     
  9. OlajuwonShake34

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    746
    Likes Received:
    0
    We should have Wafer, Battier and Artest at the same time. Slide Artest to the 4, but I guess it depends on the matchup.

    We need Battier for his defense, and he's still considered a threat to hit the 3 ball. I think if he played with Lowry more, he would get more open looks.
     
  10. Pringles

    Pringles Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,776
    Likes Received:
    1,561
    Well in terms of this year, our top 5 players in crunch time is:

    Brooks (Lowry hasn't been with the team long enough, so we don't know if he's clutch or not)
    Wafer
    Battier
    Artest
    Yao
     
  11. StevieFlight3

    StevieFlight3 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    10
    He's unreliable, he's no t-mac, paul pierce, kobe bryant.
     
  12. ibm

    ibm Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    8,600
    Likes Received:
    60
    wafer could be assigned to the last shot, depending on the match up.

    i'd like to see how yao and lowry do, too. tired of always seeing ab taking it to the rack or shooting a 3 when the defender goes under a pick; though that should also be a valid option.

    they need to do it by committee in different situations.
     
  13. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,217
    Likes Received:
    14,657
    I agree that they need to do it by committee in different situations.
     
  14. ibm

    ibm Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    8,600
    Likes Received:
    60
    it's not that i hate or not trust ab, and hindsight is always 20-20; but with 28 seconds left and we were trailing by only one, having ab take it to the rack against the best post defender in business is kind of... stupid.
     
  15. JayGoogle

    JayGoogle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    52,176
    Likes Received:
    44,897
    lol obviously.

    But he seems to hit big shots, might as well try it you never know.

    Sam Cassell was big in his rookie year for us so experience has nothing to do with being clutch.
     
  16. blender

    blender Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2002
    Messages:
    1,972
    Likes Received:
    6
    I'm torn about Wafer. He brings a much needed offensive intensity and energy to the team, but he goes through periods when he makes bad decisions with the ball. It can be a real gamble to have Wafer and Artest on the court together, especially IMO at the end of games. It's either a homerun or a strikeout.

    Plus, from what I've seen, Wafer isn't great at passing to Yao in the paint, which is critical in the fourth quarter when the defense tightens up.
     
  17. Fuzzybear

    Fuzzybear Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    96
    Absolutely, give the ball to Wafer. The ability to close is pretty innate. At the end of the game, there are those who rise to the occassion because they have a strong sense of will.

    Horry, Cassell, Elie, Hakeem, Maxwell. These guys were all closers who relished the end of the game.

    Von Wafer is not near these guys, but it goes to show that experience is overrated. Being clutch is as much a mindset as it is a skillset.

    At the end of the game, I would go with - Lowry, Von, Artest, Landry, Yao. I would feel comfortable with anything but an Artest jack-up with this group. Landry had an off night, but he has proven clutch on many occassions. He's also the perfect target for dishes from Lowry/Von drives.

    It might be unorthodox, but having Barry in there might not be bad as well. His three-point shooting could prove invaluable to setting up Yao. Problem is, we need Lowry/Aaron to handle the ball.
     
  18. BackNthDay

    BackNthDay Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,570
    Likes Received:
    469
    Von is turn over prone scares me to death driving with no idea of what he's going to do and then jumping in the air and throwing a crazy pass to no one.
     
  19. jerrios

    jerrios Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    10
    This was exactly what I was thinkin last night. I dont think we needed Shane Battier guarding mason or hill. Wafer would have added some offense over shane.
     
  20. nolimitnp

    nolimitnp Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,802
    Likes Received:
    699
    No. Excuse me, hell no.
     

Share This Page