Could we make the start-5,and bench-5....if better?

Why start Landry for Scola? Tmac at SF and Wafer at SG. Also Artest at Sg..?

 

you want DaDakota as your backup center?

all I can say about this idea is......Lou Pinella.

I think if Rick did something like that, he'd be admitting that his system has failed and he's giving up.

 

Are u kidding?In dirt time it works.

 

This would be better:

C- Yao
PF-Scola
SF-Artest
SG-Wafer
PG-Alston

Bench-5 as following

C-Scola/Hayes
PF-Landry
SF-Battier/Tmac
SG-TMac/Barry
PG-Brooks

Alston needs the ball in his hands to be effective, ergo, he and tmac cant play at the same time.

Brooks plays better with a veteran SG (barry/tmac) so he doesnt panic.

Artest and Tmac shouldnt play together since they ISO too much or chuck up shots.

finally, squeeze in Deke in there somewhere.

 

AGREE

 

I can't play center, but I could dust off my PG game and shoot better than Rafer.



DD

 

starting lineup:
PG: Aaron Brooks
SG: Wafer
SF: Artest
PF: Scola
C: Yao Ming

bench:

PG: Rafer/TM
SG: TM/BB
SF: Battier/TM
PF: Hayes/Landry
C: Scola/Deke

I think this maybe perfect lineup, also TM come off the bench would be much better than now.

 

start-pg- AB
-sg- wafer

 

pf scola
sf tmac
c yao

 

I go with who is producing
Brooks
Wafer
Artest
Scola
Yao

I think that if you surround yao with legitment three point threats and not the horrible starting cast he has to start a game we are much better

bech

alston
tmac/barry
battier
landry/Hayes
Deke/Scola/Hayes

Battier needs to only play like 20 because he is not the battier of old
tmac 25-30 because he is to outta shape or lazy or hurt to play any longer
Alston 20 or less depending on if its good alston or everyday crappy alston