1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Landry Post Option. Why not??

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by laneh, Nov 30, 2008.

Tags:
  1. laneh

    laneh Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with the disagreements of putting him in the post, but I think Adelman and the team should trust Landry to take the ball to the basket at least more than zero times.

    Perhaps, instead, have him setup in the post and then tell him to drive.
     
  2. fattedcalf

    fattedcalf Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    0
    you make good points but at the same time, Landry is the only big guy that has consistently finished around the rim this year
     
  3. Hmm

    Hmm Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    6,361
    Likes Received:
    115
    from cuts..

    the times we've given him some feeds in the low post set-up.. with his lack of ability to create for himself under the basket.. he's always found a way to make Shane Battier come off as a low post artist in comparison..
     
  4. <3myrockets

    <3myrockets Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    24
    yea why not not stir up the pot a bit? he's got the speed and strength to do something about it
     
  5. jackie_moon23

    jackie_moon23 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2008
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    1
    I wished Eddie Griffin had panned out...that guy had the makings to be an awesome PF. He was exactly what we need now; a big with offensive skillz that can block shots on defense. I just wish we had some 6'10 dudes to put in for matchup purposes. I still love scolandry tho!
     
  6. fattedcalf

    fattedcalf Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    0
    yeah you're probly right about him actually backin down guys in the post but he definitely needs some more touches. maybe givin him the green light to face up and drive off the high post more often
     
  7. Htown57

    Htown57 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    133
    I don't know about landry's back to the basket game, but i do know that he's improved his jumpshot and can blow by people who get off balance trying to close that out. He could score on a lot of folks like that (think boozer vs yao/ chris bosh/ amare--basing post up offense off of a face up game). Landry is a strong enough finisher that i think we should try this at least a couple of times with the second unit.

    The Brooks/Landry pick and roll could be like a diet nash/amare coming off our bench....or at least i can dream :cool:
     
  8. Htown57

    Htown57 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    133
    Also, lets put to rest the discussion of Landry's actual size. According to DraftExpress, which puts up pre draft (IE legit) measurements:
    Carl is 6' 7.75" without shoes, 6' 8.5" with shoes, with a 6'11" wingspan and a 8'6.5" standing reach. Which is to say, he ain't small, but he ain't big either. His standing reach in particular is WEAK:

    Carl's standing reach (which is, when you factor in strength, a better indicator than height for how "big" somebody is) is 4.5 inches less than al horford's, 7.5" less then durant's, 1" less than jeff greens..,in fact, it's the shortest of any of the big men in his class. He's tied with fellow rockets draft pick brad newley, and only slightly ahead of nick young and DJ strawberry. For comparison's sake, both Amare Stoudemire and Carlos Boozer have standing reaches of 9'0.5"....a 6 inch advantage over Carl.

    That doesn't mean he can't be effective down low, that just means he'll be better as a face up player--he needs to be jumping, moving forward, and attacking with his athleticism to neutralize the shot blocking advantage nearly anyone who guards him will have. He'll be better served facing up and attacking than as a true back to the basket "low post" option. I have no problem with this, just thought i'd lay it out there as food for thought.

    For comparison's sake:
     
  9. Htown57

    Htown57 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    133
    More on the standing reach subject, then i'm done:

    Again according to DraftExpress , the AVERAGE power forward entering the NBA (over as many years as they have data) has a standing reach of 8'10.5 inches--a 4 inch advantage over Carl's 8'6.5". That's substantial. So yes, Carl is undersized.

    HOWEVER, the average PF has a vertical of 32.8 inches. Carl's vertical in the camp was 36.5", which doesn't include the 4" he added during last season as he continued gaining strength after his torn ACL.

    So, to put it all together, the average PF is slightly taller than Carl, with 4 more inches of standing reach, BUT weighs 13 pounds less and gives up about 7 inches to carl in the vertical leap department.

    Oh, another factoid--carl also benched the 185 pound bar 21 times--second best in his draft clss, and 8 more times than the average PF. :mad: HULK SMASH :mad:


    Now that you have the numbers, debate on...
     
  10. worzel gummidge

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    6,533
    Likes Received:
    150
    http://www.82games.com/0809/08HOU9.HTM
    http://www.82games.com/0708/07HOU15A.HTM

    This season 82games has Landry making 39.3% of his jumpshots with 51% of his shots taken being jump shots.

    Last season Landry was making 44.6% of his jump shots while 34% of the shots he attempted were jump shots.
     

Share This Page