1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Espn / Hollinger] Hollinger's playoff odds out

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by northeastfan, Nov 20, 2008.

Tags:
  1. northeastfan

    northeastfan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    4,669
    Likes Received:
    20
    The amazing 22 game win streak put us back on the map last year (even 1st seed). You can't count on that kind of performance again. 44 seems about right based on how we're playing though perhaps a bit low unless health becomes an even more major issue with this team.
     
  2. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    63,512
    Likes Received:
    59,010
    whoops, i just figured out what Hollinger's flaw is in his predictions. I added up everyone's Won/Loss record throughout the league and it is:

    1229 - 1231

    :confused:

    should be 1230 wins to 1230 losses...right? must be one winner and one losser per game, i thought. Looks like hollinger needs to go back to the drawing board. haha. or am i being too hard on him.
     
  3. RockingRox

    RockingRox Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    259
    No matter what I just can believe Hollinger's formula actually predicted Spurs to finish with 35-47. Had it assumed that Manu and Parker would be out for the season?

    I will just forget the prediction for now.

     
  4. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,297
    Likes Received:
    29,824
    Don't have time to check. My guess is that since he is using probabilities, the results are rounded to the nearest integer. (e.g. If a team was predicted to win 44.364 games. It would be rounded to 44 games. Another team with 56.643 would be rounded to 57 games.) It is possible that the rounding gives the losing side one more game.
     
  5. Spacemoth

    Spacemoth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    9,909
    Likes Received:
    4,692
    Hollinger's rankings only account for box scores. They don't know that we have injuries to four of our first six rotation players. JVG said it best on Wednesday when we said we have the most potential for improvement among any team in the NBA, and that when it came down to it only LA and Boston could rival us in talent.

    Just give it time.
     
  6. ambrose86

    ambrose86 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    3
    It's still early, but I don't like our chances as well. It would take a TMAC from two yrs ago to takes us to the next level. Right now, he's not even playing as well as a guy like john salmons.
     
  7. JeopardE

    JeopardE Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,418
    Likes Received:
    246
    Again ... Hollinger did not arrive at that number. Hollinger's formula just spits out that number. That number will change into something more realistic as the season progresses.

    This is what I like about Hollinger's rankings. They're not subjective, and you can't accuse him of being biased or ignorant ... because they're not actually "his". They're just computer output, but towards the end they usually turn out to be pretty darn good.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now