Is it a candidate's responsibilty to now his/her company?

It's not our job to refute baseless and insignificant allegations from right-wing nutjobs. If you don't think the Clintons would've tried to use all this to their advantage, then you don't know the Clintons.

You're going to lose, I'd start preparing now if I were you. Your only hope is an assasination (and based on how some of McCain's supporters have acted today, it's a possibility that's starting to worry me). Or maybe Palin's minister can cook up another witchhunt to drive Obama out of the country.

 

Palin told the group to "keep up the good work". She is running for office, albeit in a very embarassing way.

 

yeah, he just votes with that silly little veto thing

 

Bleh, this is totally crap, and you know that. If this is what passes for attacking Obama...man.

But...in the interest of having something to contribute...

I see your Ayers.

And raise you a David Ifshin.

 

Obama actually votes 'with Bush' 40% of the time

 

There's nothing to answer since you have proven absolutely nothing.

But keep up the good work!

 

Actually the only thing disproven was that Palin was a member of the AIP. Her husband Todd has been proven to have been a member, and she is on video she made for the AIP convention telling them to "Keep up the good work."

It is true that Todd isn't running for office. But you asked about judgment involving people that candidates hang around. There is of course Palin's video message telling these secessionists to "keep up the good work"

 

too bad

but we've got four weeks to go!

 

This might be the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. An arsenal of reports, documents, personal accounts are available that disprove this notion - yet are ignored. At the same time, the "we are too dumb and we'll never know the real truth" tripe is trotted out to contradict anyone foolish enough to actually waste their time proving you so horrendously wrong it boggles the mind. It's utterly amazing that the party of McCain wants to move "past" Bush's term yet is still mired in a perpetual inability to remove itself from the false reality the Bush junta concocted.

Key word - political circles. No one in Obama's camp comes close to rumsfeld, rove, cheney, gonzales, etc etc etc.

Well, sure you can if you get off the wingnut flavored kool aid.

It has been investigated to death. You appear to think there is more there than an absurd amount of media coverage has revealed. I can't help you there. Maybe FB will correct you again for the 50000th time. I find it r****ded to do so.

When I get desperate my tummy hurts too.

What allegations? That he knows Ayers? Wooooooo.

Hilarious.

It's also nothing but a bunch of cooked up innuendo based on a shoddy application of "guilt by association". Lame.

Awesome - any sensical answers are probably "cooked" by the MSM!!! Your conversion to basso-inspired wingnuttia is complete!


Sorry to go off on you. These tired attacks are just STUPID. Find something tangible, then we can talk.

 

So you are willingly saying that McCain hanging out with a traitor who sold his country out is A-OK with you, yes?

 

There's nothing to defend. The Clintons tried it earlier this year and it didn't work then. It's not going to work now either. You have 29 days to get prepared for your defeat. I'd start preparing now...if you need any advice, let me know because I have two straight elections of learning how to deal.

The only people who care about this are people so entrenched in their belief that Obama is a terrible person and they're scared to death that their hero McCain (who they threw under the bus 8 years ago) is going to lose because the Republicans have proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they cannot be trusted to lead this land.

People who are thinking straight, people who are excited and ready for change know these attempts at associating Obama with any of these people is an exercise in futility. No one believes that Obama agreed with what any of these people did and they know that there's not a successful politician out there who has spent their careers without having dealt with shady people at some point. Such as Keating or Liddy or the AIP (who, once again, want Alaska to secede from the USA...keep up the good work).

 

I don't know why it's mentioned here either. I guess some expect the worst out of their political opposites.

 

I have no idea why I would mention that. Oh, wait.

 

?


I have no defense. Because there is nothing needing defending.

Telling that you have nothing else to say.