1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

McCain: Pakistan is beyond the Gates of Hell

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Major, Jul 29, 2008.

Tags:
  1. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,802
    Likes Received:
    16,479
    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dkt0LO3CE3I&fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Dkt0LO3CE3I&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

    It seems McCain will chase down Bin Laden to the gates of hell, but not into Pakistan. :D

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/206076.php
     
  2. TheMountainTop

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    563
    Likes Received:
    10
    hahah that was funny.

    Its all bull crap. These politicians just say stuff. He should have been caught a long time ago. They just tell us Americans what we want to hear but they'll never catch him.
     
  3. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,206
    Likes Received:
    20,353
    I don't see this as really negative for McCain - it's hypothetical and ya know what, respecting Pakistan as an ally isn't bad foreign policy.
     
  4. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,830
    Likes Received:
    20,489
    Pakistan isn't all that strong of an ally.
     
  5. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,802
    Likes Received:
    16,479
    Except that the territory in Pakistan where OBL is supposely hiding isn't controlled by Pakistan at all.

    So, if this is really the policy, you're basically ceding that you will never capture OBL as long as he hangs out in that part of Pakistan. That doesn't really fit with "we'll follow him to the gates of hell".
     
  6. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,206
    Likes Received:
    20,353

    that's a matter of debate.
     
  7. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,206
    Likes Received:
    20,353

    You're right. But Obama has faced similar rhetorical issues.

    I doubt even Obama can get away with launching an attack on Pakistan - especially after Bush has just done it.

    The opportunity to get Bin Laden, or the best ones, have passed. The reality of geopolitics must take hold - and realize that the relationship with Pakistan and the outcome of that nation may be far more important than the capture of bin Laden.

    I know that no one can agree to that or echo it - but I do believe that it's the hard cold truth.

    A "contained" bin Laden is far better than a destabalized and fanatical Pakistan.
     
  8. TheMountainTop

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    563
    Likes Received:
    10

    This guy is on the money
     
  9. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,830
    Likes Received:
    20,489
    Then let's debate it. Pakistan has signed truces with Al-Qaeda allies and the Taliban allowing them to operate freely in the regions between Pakistan and Afghanistan. They aren't able or willing to stop them there.

    As a result terrorists and the Taliban have been able to gain ground in AFghanistan causing the U.S. forces to have to abandon posts, retreat, and give up territory that we once controlled. Pakistan isn't a true democracy and is under control of the kind of dictatorship we are supposed to be against. They have been peddling nuclear technology to unfriendly nations all the while.

    We don't need allies like that. An extremist Pakistan isn't all that likely even if the current govt. is gone, and extremists haven't done well and lack support in politics of Pakistan, so it isn't likely that they would be the ones to take over.

    If the Bush administration or an Obama administration is able to strike terrorists inside Pakistan and the Pakistani govt. won't do what it takes, then we need to protect ourselves and take the terrorists out. We've done it a few times already, and there is no reason to stop doing it now.
     
  10. Two Sandwiches

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    23,143
    Likes Received:
    15,086
    You cannot say that you WILL catch the guy, and then in the next couple of sentences, sit there and say, "Well, we'll catch him, but we can't go into Pakistan."

    What are you going to do, claim that he's cheating, and not playing by the rules when he goes into Pakistan(or stays there), and you can't catch him.

    That's first grade rhetoric. It's flat out stupid.

    Bush didn't even put his foot in his mouth this many times during the campaign trail. Look how his presidency has turned out.
     
  11. sook

    sook Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    they are a nuclear power, there is a reason the US never had troops there it's all bullcrap they can't do anything
     
  12. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
  13. TheMountainTop

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    563
    Likes Received:
    10

    Let me assure you that Pakistan's nuclear power has no effect on the US when it comes to going to war.

    Pakistan's nuclear program is way behind that of the Western Nations.

    However, Pakistan being a nuclear power still does play an effect when it comes to world politics and so yes maybe that is why the US will never go to war with them.

    In terms of Democracy Pakistan is not a true democracy but it is also not a true dictatorship. Atleast they attempt to be democratic unlike Saudi Arabia, Iran, and etc.

    Let me tell you guys another thing. No one and I mean no one wants to go fight a war in that Northwest Tribal Region of Pakistan. Do you know that it is one of the most dangerous locations in the world? Look it up people. Its called the Khyber Pass. I assure you that niether the US nor Pakistan want to go into that hell hole.
     
  14. lpbman

    lpbman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2001
    Messages:
    4,241
    Likes Received:
    816
    So uh.... you assure me Pakistan having nuclear arms has no effect and then what, forgot what you wrote?
     
  15. sook

    sook Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    DUDE..LOL when it comes to nuclear weaps how big they are isn't much of the problem. The amount of damage one could cause is unimaginable..

    one country fires a 50 meg while one fires a 10 meg it will still be catastrophic
     
  16. sook

    sook Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    Also have you ever heard of MAD? There is a reason that the cold war was never actually a war, simply due to that principle.
     
  17. TheMountainTop

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    563
    Likes Received:
    10

    Let me rephrase that.

    It will have an effect but what i meant to say is that there is no way the missiles from Pakistan will ever reach the United States and also I dont think the Pakistanis have any way to intercept the missiles that would be thrown at them.

    The Pakistanis nuclear weapons are for the sole purpose of defending itself from India.
     

Share This Page