1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Any chance to get AI too?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by TexanJohn, Jul 29, 2008.

Tags:
  1. engr chris

    engr chris Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,219
    Likes Received:
    267
    ^I mean need.
     
  2. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,538
    Likes Received:
    38,763
    Battier, Rafer, Hayes, Head...would probably get it done.

    DD
     
  3. Bigdaddy210121

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    4
    Battier, Hayes, Head, Alston, Francis for AI would work, but i wouldn't do it. ;)
     
  4. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,217
    Likes Received:
    14,657
    Even if it did,Ron and AI are not likely to get along.The team will combust.
     
  5. Tfor3

    Tfor3 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    20,945
    Likes Received:
    25,214
    We have a young AI in brooks, so no need for AI
     
  6. alexcapone

    alexcapone Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,349
    Likes Received:
    543
    I would only say yes to AI because I'm anticipating that we will only have 3 out of 4 per game due to injuries/suspensions. We need to make sure we follow the big 3 mold like Boston and AI would be the icing on the cake. If we can trade more trash like Head/rafer then why not? It'll also help trim the roster down too...
     
  7. ACL1

    ACL1 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    115
    No Thanks
     
  8. slmonky

    slmonky Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    0
    We don't really need him. A team like ours should get a smart PG like Nash to evenly distribute the ball.
    Plus, We have a young AI in Brooks, and a broken but maybe repairable AI in SF3!
     
  9. Two Sandwiches

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    23,133
    Likes Received:
    15,071
    I wish we could get an up and coming guard like Delonte West, for instance, at PG.
     
  10. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390
    Battier and Rafer for Hinrich makes more sense to me.
     
  11. pbthunder

    pbthunder Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    39
    How about TMac for AI?

    Yao/Mutombo
    Scolandry/Hayes/Dorsey
    Artest
    Battier/Barry/Head
    AI/Rafer/Brooks/Steve
     
  12. rfrocket

    rfrocket Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    2,565
    How about this.
    Battier, Rafer, and filler for AI. Then T-Mac to Detroit for Rip, and Chauncy.

    Talk about a stacked lineup.
    Yao, AI, Ron-Ron, Rip, Chauncy, Scola, AB, Barry, Landry, Deke, Franchise(maybe). We could just sub out whole 5-man units at once.



    And please no "Captain Kirk". Extremely overrated imho.
     
  13. Noob Cake

    Noob Cake Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,563
    Likes Received:
    729
    No, we are not trading TMac until TMac, Yao, and Ron Ron plays a game together.

    Morey is not stupid enough to trade fairly. We don't need a scoring PG like Iverson. There are only so many shots to go around. Battier could be traded, but most likely won't.

    Best fit but won't happen: Nash, Calderon, Kidd
     
  14. longbow111

    longbow111 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please don't do stupid after you just finished something brilliant, Morey. I'd rather have Rafer than AI. Under current NBA rules, there's only one ball allowed to be on the court.
     
  15. blackwindy

    blackwindy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    what if we offer battier alston landry(sign and trade with 5m) and some role players (head novak?) and draft picks

    could it match in someway?
     
  16. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,280
    It doesn't make sense to go for AI anymore. There would not be enough shots. Plus, we should have one chemistry risk, not two. That ends badly - see Portland. Detroit with ONLY Rasheed works - but if you had Bonzi there as well - look out.
     
  17. WillG

    WillG Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    8
    wut about mike miller?
     
  18. Albert Einstain

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    0
    Now that bjax has been traded ,the only way to match AI's salary is to trade tmac.Will morey trade tmac for Iverson? :confused:

    "No way could i trade tmac for ai"morey says.
     
  19. wingz0

    wingz0 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    0
    Stop with all the random fantasy roster trades already.

    What do we need another wing player for when we already got McGrady, Artest, Battier and Barry (Francis too if you count him as an SG).

    The roster is fine. This isn't fantasy basketball. Iverson or any other volume shooter coming over will just screw up the locker room.

    Alston is adequate. Unless we can get a guy like Calderon or Delonte West, I wouldn't touch Battier nor Alston in trades.
     
  20. Ron Artest

    Ron Artest New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    3 big scorers are enough for ROX
     

Share This Page