1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Houston: Worst Recycler Among Big American Cities

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by rimrocker, Jul 29, 2008.

  1. mtbrays

    mtbrays Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8,662
    Likes Received:
    8,087
    [​IMG]
    I can beat your stupid computer!
     
  2. updawg

    updawg Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,985
    Likes Received:
    166
    at people don't like to recycle
     
  3. DFWRocket

    DFWRocket Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    4,727
    Likes Received:
    2,579

    yeah...but who really wants to sit on the toilet with a laptop?
     
  4. DFWRocket

    DFWRocket Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    4,727
    Likes Received:
    2,579
    This is sad.

    Ft. Worth has a great recycling program. The city gives us a very large recycling bin (trash can) and we don't have to sort any of the recycled items. (cans, glass, plastic, cardboard). The city bases its trash pickup fees on the size of the trash can you use, so the more you recycle, the less your water/trash bill is. With the exception of the diapers (we have 2 kids in diapers), we're recycling about 75% of our trash. Before we had our kids, our trash can was about 1/3 of the size of our recycle bin. We had to move up to the medium size trash can (which is still smaller than the recycling bin) when we started buying diapers.
     
  5. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,206
    Likes Received:
    20,353
    Recycling isn't this huge windfall for sure, but I understood it was always plastics that was the inefficient part of recycling - the other types were usual efficient even when you strip out externalities (such as reduced air pollution, CO2 emissions, leakage from landfill, etc)...

    I don't think it's a big deal that Houston doesn't recycle to be honest. At least not right now.

    Recycling is still in experimental phase, and it's more important in places where landfill space is tight such as the north east, and where there is the density to make it efficient - such as densely packed areas like new york.
     
  6. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    The problem with that logic is that plastics are the most harmful to the environment if not recycled. They last forever. Even after being broken down to the molecular level. Google "the great pacific garbage patch" and prepare to be deeply concerned.

    The worst part? There really is no good way to clean it up. None.
     
  7. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    See, now, if we had a moonshot plan to clean up this, I might support it.

    /Communist
     
  8. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    moonshot? clean up this?


    I fail your language comprehend.
     
  9. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    The Garbage Patch Pacific, and, in general, oceans.

    Spending billions cleaning up the oceans >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spending trillions tearing down power plants and putting up windmills.
     
  10. thelasik

    thelasik Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Messages:
    3,347
    Likes Received:
    72
    LOL I was thinking the same thing.
     
  11. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Ah I see... allow me to amend...

    billions cleaning up oceans > trillions revamping power infrastructure > trillions on useless wars

    I'm not an advocate of complete overhaul of the power system like Gore - it has to be more gradual than 10 years, for example. But at a minimum, we can start forcing coal plants to actually get up to current code (the supreme court did finally enforce this) and provide significant barriers to non-renewable energy plants in the future. Nuclear would be ok, but has the opposite problem. We need to deregulate in order to not drown in nuclear waste.
     

Share This Page