Government Stupidity Example 2,432,631: Mandate Something the Market has Already Done

weslinder · Jul 22, 2008

Next, New York will mandate that houses have doors. And this has inspired Federal Idiots (Congressmen) to revive their version of the same bill.

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--violentvideogames0722jul22,0,7308055.story

NY law seeks to restrict violent video games

By MICHAEL GORMLEY | Associated Press Writer
July 22, 2008

ALBANY, N.Y. - Gov. David Paterson signed a law Tuesday that he said will lead to restrictions on video game violence and help families better monitor grisly games.

The law will create an advisory council to study the effects of violent games on the children. It will also require parental controls on game consoles by 2010 and prominent displays of age ratings on game packages.

But critics say the bill is too vague and too watered down to accomplish its goal. And critics including the group Americans for Tax Reform contend that curbing video violence wasn't really the point in New York or nearly a dozen other states that enacted similar laws, only to see them struck down by courts as unconstitutional.

"It's moral preening," said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. "The bill is unconstitutional and has been found that way in other states. And when the inevitable lawsuit comes, the state pays for everybody's legal expenses."

"The reason it is politically popular," he said, "Is the average citizen will read a headline that says, `State Legislature is against violence in children's video games.' They are unlikely to read a headline that says, `Legislature will waste $70,000 of your tax dollars."'

"It also unfairly singles out the video game industry over all other forms of media," said Richard Taylor of the Entertainment Software Association. "If New York lawmakers feel it is the role of government to convene a government commission on game content, they could next turn to other content such as books, theater and film."

Violations of new labeling and parental control provisions in New York could result in $100 civil penalties. However, the parental controls and the voluntary ratings are already common in the industry.

Language making a felony of selling video games that are sexually explicit or contain depraved violence was lost during furious lobbying that derailed the bill in May 2007. That provision would have made the law among the strictest in the nation.

Then-Gov. Eliot Spitzer made a high priority of the issue in 2007 and it was the subject of several press conferences. The effort continued in the Legislature after Spitzer resigned in March after being disgraced in a prostitution investigation.

The new law was strongly supported in the Senate and Assembly this legislative election year.

The question was never whether to do something about video games that star automatic weapons and gore _ that's been politically attractive for years, resulting in legislation in the other states besides New York. The question has always been how to do it without losing a constitutional challenge in the courts.

A prime sponsor, Republican Sen. Andrew Lanza of Staten Island, said the felony provision wouldn't have held up in court, but the remaining elements should stand and help limit access to the games. When the bill was passed this spring, Lanza said the criminal sanction sought by some is already addressed at least in part under p*rnography and other laws.

Most of the cities and states that have seen their regulations invalidated by courts tried to equate video violence with p*rnography and restricted the sale of the games to children. The courts have ruled the restrictions violated the U.S. Constitution's freedom of speech protections.

"New Yorkers do not need the state judging which video games are appropriate and which aren't," said New York Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Donna Lieberman. "Parents, not government committees, should be responsible for making those judgments."
Click to expand...

DonkeyMagic · Jul 22, 2008

sadly i'm not surprised. What i'm still surprised at is how people still want the govt to be bigger and stick it's nose further into areas, despite it's historic inefficiency

Then again, maybe it's not all that surprising when no one takes responsibilty for their own lives, but rather looks to big brother to hold their junk while they pee

CBrownFanClub · Jul 22, 2008

DonkeyMagic said:

sadly i'm not surprised. What i'm still surprised at is how people still want the govt to be bigger and stick it's nose further into areas, despite it's historic inefficiency
Click to expand...

Republicans: Creating Government Small Enough To Fit In Your Vagina

SamFisher · Jul 22, 2008

I could see where Grand Theft Auto would hit home for Spitzer - hookers are for PAYING, not beating up and stealing money from.

KingCheetah · Jul 22, 2008

Good -- video games are too violent.

Apollo Creed · Jul 22, 2008

If they take away my games I'll kill them all!!!!

Bandwagoner · Jul 22, 2008

Video games have the best rating system of any business.

This is a huge waste of $$$$$.

basso · Jul 22, 2008

SamFisher said:

I could see where Grand Theft Auto would hit home for Spitzer - hookers are for PAYING, not beating up and stealing money from.
Click to expand...

change, you can believe in.

Forums

Government Stupidity Example 2,432,631: Mandate Something the Market has Already Done

weslinder Member

DonkeyMagic Member
Supporting Member

CBrownFanClub Member

SamFisher Member

KingCheetah Atomic Playboy

Apollo Creed Contributing Member

Bandwagoner Member

basso Member
Supporting Member

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!

Government Stupidity Example 2,432,631: Mandate Something the Market has Already Done

weslinder Member

DonkeyMagic Member Supporting Member

CBrownFanClub Member

SamFisher Member

KingCheetah Atomic Playboy

Apollo Creed Contributing Member

Bandwagoner Member

basso Member Supporting Member

Share This Page

DonkeyMagic Member
Supporting Member

basso Member
Supporting Member