1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  1. aka ace

    aka ace Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    What about Latrell Sprewell, the Knicks want to get rid of him why not grab him?

    They would probably want to dump charlie wards contract with him.....

    Spree/Ward
    for
    KT/Mooch/Cato/Walt +/- toronto's #1

    PG- Steve/Ward
    SG- Mobley/Torres
    SF- Spree/Rice
    PF- Griff/Taylor
    C- Willis/Griff

    Sprewell can provide offense as well as great defense, imo he is the best 3 defender in the league. He is a 19pt/4reb/4asst player.

    Knicks would get a good backup/starting PG, a starting C, a backup PF, and a 3 pt shooter of the bench.

    Would you do this trade?
     
  2. jiggadi

    jiggadi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2001
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    7
    I would love to see that happen. I think he would motivate others on the team with the way he hustles night after night. And provide veteran leadership on the court. Something Glen cant do, at least not this year anyway.
     
  3. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,982
    Likes Received:
    39,450
  4. krosfyah

    krosfyah Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,814
    Likes Received:
    1,623
    Spree is 6-5...I would not do this trade. We need some size up front and this basically pawns off everybody over 6-5 except Griff and MoT. That would leave us anemic and we could never compete against the western forwards.
     
  5. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    Do we get a neck brace for Rudy with that deal?
     
  6. Dave Jamerson

    Dave Jamerson Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    367
    Likes Received:
    1
    larry smith would knock spree out before he got to rudy
     
  7. CriscoKidd

    CriscoKidd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    546
    the knicks are not looking to get rid of spree unless they get a star. They have enough overpaid bench players.
     
  8. aka ace

    aka ace Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    What do you want? a Tim Duncan? or a Shaq? we can't compete with the western forwards because all of them are taken.

    We can get some size in the upcoming draft maybe a C. But we are in a log jam at PF we already have size. And the only good C in the whole league is shaq, whom nobody can guard. Let the C be our weakest position, isn't every NBA team's C weak anyway?

    We are currently over the cap for the next 2 years. So we can't lure in a big name FA (i.e. Duncan, Jermaine O'neal, McDyess).

    Rather than looking for size, I say we get a good SF with defense and can shoot the rock so when Francis/Mobley gets doubled he'll get either an open shot or penetrate to the basket.

    Griffin, will be our PF/C of the future, but right now he can't compete with Duncan, Webber or Sheed. All we can do now is wait till he develops into an all-star PF/C.

    We don't need anymore size up front. We will have Griffin/Taylor and this upcoming draft. That is enough.
     
  9. haven

    haven Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 1999
    Messages:
    7,945
    Likes Received:
    14
    Spreewell is a thug/scorer. He plays passable defense. Sounds a lot like Mobley. Slightly bigger, slightly less quick. Except Mobley's not a thug.

    I would not do this deal.
     
  10. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    The center position is already our weakest position, trading Cato would be a huge mistake.
     
  11. JAG

    JAG Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please God, no...part of the reason there have been continual Houston or Spreewell trade rumours for a couple of years is that neither is really a SF...they both are pretty much pure SG's, and both carry hefty contracts and declining skills. What we do not need is another trade with the Knicks for a diminishing return and big price tag. And we would be playing him out of position, even if the asking price wasn't dissuasive.
     
  12. TBar

    TBar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    3,033
    Likes Received:
    1
    We do not need Latrell Sprewell-I would be concerned about team chemistry. He would be a disruptive force. I do respect his game- but I don't want him as a Rocket....

    New York will want too much. I would give New York Glen Rice and Moochie for Othella Harrington.
     
  13. dave feitl

    dave feitl Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2002
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would love spree but if we got him but he makes too much and we don't have any pieces we can afford to lose for him.No question he could be a leader we're missing.I think in this next draft we really need to get the best leader out there.Sometimes they are not the best of players, but could be available in the 2nd round.SF or C either or both.We have to find that leader next year in Steve or draft or in FA.
     
  14. krosfyah

    krosfyah Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,814
    Likes Received:
    1,623
    I'm not suggesting we necessarily bulk up. I'm suggesting we shouldn't "bulk down" with this suggested trade. We lose Cato, KT and Walt. All three of which give us some size that's we lose.

    We are already have the 2nd worst front court production in the league. This trade would unload a very productive KT and a developing Cato. Walt has always been productive and gives us added size to matchup with some of the taller and bulky PF's. We'd get nothing in return to fill those roles.

    Spree would make a better SG. Cat and Steve can both play SG just fine. Torres can even play SG sufficiently and will get better.
     
  15. aka ace

    aka ace Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    1) We will lose Walt this off-season. Hes too old to resign. Plus we have G.Rice.

    2) Why do you guys think soo highly of Cato now? Just before this season you guys would do anything to get rid of his him and his contract. I would rather pick up a center in this years draft instead of having Cato and his 7 mil a year contract.

    3) KT is expendable because MoT has been injured this entire year, when he comes back KT is out of the picture.

    4) If we do trade for better front court... how will KT/Cato/Walt/Mooch get you a dominant PF or C? Maybe an average PF or C but not a good one.

    Yes we have the 2nd worst front court.... but what can we do about it? We can't get a high-priced FA who can make an impact immediatly. Our only way of boosting our front court is by letting Griffin develop, hope Taylor rebounds from his injury, or by the draft.
     
  16. Georock

    Georock Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2001
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    1
    Improve should be the right answer, but as you point out, we can´t get a impact player in that position right now.
    However, I don´t think that giving Thomas (our best frontcourt player so far this season) and Cato (when he finally is playing the way he´s supossed to play) is the correct move. You talk about Taylor, but he´ll be coming off an injury and that is a concern, and the draft pick could be anything, we don´t know the position in the lottery, less the players that will be available.
     
  17. Zacatecas

    Zacatecas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    111
    Just say no to Spree!!
     
  18. empiric

    empiric Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2001
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    1
    For such a player as Sprewell I will add even Mobley to this trade!
    Imagine a champions' line-up like this:

    PG- Steve/Ward
    SG- Spree/Torres
    SF- draft pick/Rice
    PF- Griff/Taylor
    C- Willis/Griff
     
  19. aka ace

    aka ace Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, so.... you think this is a better move. Start Taylor in front of Thomas next season... watch our soon-to-be star player get less minutes because of the log jam at PF. Take a chance on Cato (and his 7 mil a year contract) hope he doesn't get injured like he does every year. Yes hes playing mediocre this year but would you want to depend on him every year? I would rather take a C in this draft, who will get paid 5 times less than him and will maybe have the same production. i.e. Cato - 25 mins. 6.8 pts 6.9 rebs less than a block per game. Brendan Haywood is putting up those kinds of numbers in less minutes.
     
  20. ROCS4LIFE

    ROCS4LIFE Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    0
    No way, Sprewell is a problem player just like barkey who messed up the Rockets championship years. Forget him and let's get someone that is worth it. Like Shawn Marion.
     

Share This Page