The way I see it...

Seattle should stay put. I hate Seattle! From Chambers & Ellis to Payton & Kemp, I can't stand that francshise, but I remember how torn I was when the Oilers relocated and I had to adopt "Da Bears" as my new favorie NFL team before H-Town got a new franchise.

Maybe it's the fans fault for not advocating a new arena, but still its crap. Remember how close we were to losing the Rox - even after we recently won not one, but two Championships

Anyway, if anyone has to move it should be these teams...

The Jazz should move back to NO (Utah doesn't deserve a team - almost 30 years after they stole the Jazz and their fans still don't know thing one about basketball) and please stop ringing that damn bell after you make a frickin' basket!

While we're at it, the Hornets should move back to Charlotte, the Clippers back to San Diego (LA - a city that can't support an NFL franchise - certainly doesn't deserve two NBA teams)

The Lakers (albeit the terrible namesake) can stay because of their history, but they should be forced to change their name. May I suggest the "rodney" Kings (oh that one is already taken) or maybe the LA Riots.

The Griz can stay, but only if they change their name - maybe the Cohnheads as a tribute to Marc Cohn's "Walking in Memphis" or something to do with Fed-Ex. How many Grizzly Bears are there in Memphis anyway?

Mavs should rename themselves the Floppers or Whiners as a tribute to Dirk or their current owner. Better yet, lets call them the 96ers as a tribute to for the infamous "Finley was out of Bounds" play; since according to "Benedict" Salvatore "the actual length" of the court should be 96' not 94 feet!

The Rockets can and should stay (after all they are the only team in the history of the league where a team that moved and kept their name actually made more sense after they moved than before)

I'm sure there's more, what do you think?