1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Is this a Good Idea?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Rocket River, Mar 29, 2008.

  1. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,194
    Likes Received:
    32,908
    Concentration of Power?
    Is this a Good Idea? Why or Why Not?

    Rocket River


    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/03/28/financial.oversight/index.html?iref=topnews


    Plan would expand Fed's power to intervene in financial crisis

    Story Highlights
    Treasury secretary to propose regulatory overhaul Monday

    Federal Reserve would expand oversight to virtually entire financial industry

    Proposals meant to provide better framework in rough times, spokeswoman says

    Nearly all the proposals will require the approval of Congress

    Next Article in U.S. »




    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Federal Reserve would have the power to regulate virtually the entire financial industry under a Treasury Department proposal to be announced Monday.


    Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will introduce the proposals in a speech Monday, a spokeswoman says.

    The proposal is part of a sweeping overhaul of the government's regulatory structure that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will propose in a speech Monday, said Treasury Department spokeswoman Michele Davis.

    "I am not suggesting that more regulation is the answer, or even that more effective regulation can prevent the periods of financial market stress that seem to occur every five to 10 years," Paulson will say, according to a text of the speech obtained by The Associated Press.

    According to Brookly McLaughlin, another department spokeswoman, Paulson will propose these changes:

    • Give the Federal Reserve authority to look at the financial status of any institution that could affect market stability;

    • Merge the Securities and Exchange Commission with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission;

    • Give stock exchanges more room for self-regulation;

    • Consolidate bank supervision into one regulator.

    One of the most dramatic changes would extend the powers of the Federal Reserve -- designed to regulate the commercial banking industry -- to oversight of virtually the entire financial industry.

    That change would make the Fed the first responder to a potential financial crisis. Currently, several agencies and commissions have oversight over various parts of the industry, but none has the broad authority.

    The proposals have been in the works since June -- two months before the current sub-prime mortgage crisis began affecting financial markets, Davis said.

    Don't Miss
    Read the executive summary (PDF)
    Senators want details on Bear Sterns bailout
    CNNMoney: Paulson defends Fed's rescue of firm
    Nevertheless, the proposed change would help the oversight and regulatory system catch up with the events of the last two weeks, when the Federal Reserve intervened to facilitate the sale of failing brokerage Bear Stearns to JP Morgan Chase.

    The financial industry's initial response was positive.

    Tim Ryan, president and CEO of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, called Paulson's proposals "a thoughtful and sweeping plan."

    "Our present regulatory framework was born of Depression-era events and is not well suited for today's environment where billions of dollars race across the globe with the click of a mouse," he said.

    "That fact, teamed with the current market conditions, result in a universal agreement that it is time to modernize and revitalize the current system."

    Some of the proposals -- broadening the focus of a presidential working group on financial markets and tightening oversight on mortgage originators -- are classified as short-term recommendations.

    Davis said the department does not expect to finish the longer-term proposals before President Bush leaves office in January. Instead, she said, Paulson is trying to start the process of creating "a better regulatory framework so we're in better shape next time" there's a rough patch in the economy.

    The banking and financial industry regulation structure has been developed over decades, from the establishment of the national bank charter in 1863 to the creation of the Federal Reserve system in 1913 to recent changes made in response to other crises.

    The ever-expanding complexities of global markets have largely outgrown some of the structure's component parts, creating weaknesses and redundancies.

    Nearly all of the proposals will require the approval of Congress, where Democrats are at work on their own proposals.

    Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York, said that Democrats "agree with large parts" of Paulson's plan but think the proposals should go further.

    "Very complex financial instruments have evolved in recent years, like [collateral debt obligations] and credit default swaps, which pose potential problems in terms of systemic risk," Schumer said. "The Treasury Department should address these issues as well." E-mail to a friend
     
  2. DaFingerWag

    DaFingerWag Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    1
    Doesn't sound like

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Refman

    Refman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    13,674
    Likes Received:
    312
    Of course the financial sector loves this idea. You go from the Fed and Justice Department regulating to Congress regulating.

    Anytime you get Congress involved, the PAC money speaks. Anytime you get Congress involved, it takes forever and a day to get anything done. Why don't we write the banks a blank check to do whatever the hell they want?

    Sheesh.
     
  4. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,048
    I'm not sure, nor have the technical savvy, to know whether this is a last ditch effort by Bush to save the system (and his legacy) or if it's just to place a watered down regulation law in order to preempt the next President's reforms of the disastrous financial system.

    Likely a mixture of both.

    They already did for the last 6 years.

    $516,000,000,000,000
     

Share This Page