my friend and i were arguing about this. he said luther is a much better all around player than korver, who's a shooting stiff, and he wouldnt give him up. i think korver is much better all around than head. he's great at moving without the ball and he actually has handles. plus with his size we wouldnt be so small in the back court. i would defintely trade head for korver. what do yall think?
why would the Jazz do it after just trading for him, and then going on a huge run w/ him being a key cog?
This thread is a moot point because Utah isn't trading Korver. Besides, all it takes is one hot run for Head in the playoffs and/or a bad playoff run for Korver and we'll have thread with people saying that Head is a better all-around player then Korver. What have you done for me lately basically.
In that case would you trade Ray Allen for Luther Head? I know there are many here who love Head but Allen is just all round better. Tell me what you think.
I would rather have Korver. I wonder why he wasn't in the 3 pt contest though. I'd like to see him, Kapono and Novak go at it.
I would take Korver over last year reguar season's Head, not to mention he sucked up big time in playoff and this year.
lol Guy:"Hey i got good tickets to the rox game, wanna go?" Girl" Naw, I'm alright.." Guy:"Ashton Kutcher is going to be playing..." Girl: "OMG, OMG,OMG,OMG"
i was pretty upset when i heard that the jazz got korver for an ending contract. he's much better than luther and the rockets should've offered him for kyle. even if fr no other reason that to block the jazz from getting him.
First of all, It's stupid to Argue that Head is better than Korver. Second of all, no team in the NBA would ever trade Head for Korver.
