What is your definition of "a lot" of sexual partners?

hoes dont act right, its hoes on a mission and its hoes on a crackpipe.

 

being married has really cut down on my sexual partners.

 

how about the words of kurupt?

And when it all boils down you gonna find in the end
a b**** is a b****, but a Dogg is a man's best friend
So what you found you a hoe that you like
But you can't make a hoe a housewife

 

I guess we gotta agree to disagree then. Because to me, given one person who has cheated and one person who hasn't, the one who has is more likely to cheat in future. Simple. if you disagree with that, fine. For myself, that statement is clearly true.

You seem to think all my views are derived from my experience with a single person. Sorry, but no. You're the one who's being too judgmental of me. I told you I don't care what you do, just that I'm not gonna date anyone like you because I feel people like you are a bad risk. There's nothing *wrong* with being promiscuous outside of marriage. I just don't wanna marry you, and I don't want to be promiscuous. That's not a judgment, it's a personal philosophy/preference.

My views didn't change all of a sudden because of what happened with that one incident. They were like that before. IF I HAD KNOWN HER HISTORY BEFORE WE GOT SERIOUS, we wouldn't have gotten serious in the first place. It's not like I had different views before, then she cheated on me, then everything changed. All that experience did was reinforce my existing views. If you don't believe that, that's your prerogative.

 

Good point.

 

But I think the real question is, would you rather sleep with a classy woman whos had 17 partners and easier or a classy women who has 4 and might take a while?

Is it just me or is a girl with 20+ partners and classy in the same sentence an oxy moron? (given the age ranges i stipulated before) I guess that goes back to the original question though

 

This is more reasonable than drexlers assertion that more sex = more cheating.

That opinion seems more bitterness than reality, and would be highly difficult to back up as some sort of universal truth.

 

Thats just silly. I bet having blonde hair increases the chances by .000000000001%. It does not mean anything.

 

Has anyone said: this tread is useless without a picture yet?

 

Is it only highly difficult to back up, because very few things correlate to doing something a lot and then stopping to be faithful?

If you eat a lot, then get married, its not like you cant eat with other people etc etc etc. Sexual acts are the only things considered taboo.


It comes down to its really not human nature to be faithful, in its most animalistic of forms.

 

maybe we were following the drummer boy

 

lol, it means a little ^

 

haha I knew it...but where's the pics?

 

Heres an extreme example.

If hitler killed millions of jews, would you bet people other than jews are next on his list?

 

Fixed it for ya.

 

further proof that hitler can, and will, enter any argument...even ones about sex

 

Thanks. I was too confused to even know how to respond. That was odd.

 

Point is, if you Huck Fundreds of guys A DAY, then got married, i bet it would be harder to stop than if you didnt.

Now, if you were a virgin before, id say thats diff. Cuz once she gets a taste she might want it from all over or to try different people

 

Yeah, because all women operate on only these two levels. I mean, they're really just like dogs, you know. If a dog has eaten off the table for years, he'll never learn how not to. And if you give him some food from the table - man, your fridge is history.

Give me a break.