Are you referring to one from seasons past, or a new one? If you're referring to what you may have heard on 610 this morning, that was just a text that I sent in to see what Jeremy thought of it. I had posted that same trade on here yesterday. He didn't really make it clear that it was just a suggestion from a texter... Absolutely no truth to it whatsoever.
Man I thought this was a late christmas gift. I buddy test me and said he heard onthe radio it was going to be Head, James and Snyder for Warrick and JWill. Damn, damn, damn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm a little disappointed in Warrick. I thought coming out of college that he could model his game after Tayshaun Prince and become a lockdown defensive SF rather than a rail-thin PF. He just never developed his perimeter game.
The board almost unanimously was in favor of the Eddie Griffin trade when it happened and sorely disappointed in the years after. With the Rudy Gay trade, the board was almost unanimously appalled. Then many of us (not me) tried to put a happy face on it. Now most of the board is back to being appalled. BTW, Warrick is a "tweener" we don't need, although he would be superior to Battier as a defensive SF under Adelman simply because he is quicker. Warrick isn't as good at the trey as SB but he is a much better finisher at the rim.
Keep telling yourself that: "Atleast we are not going to get slack for being the Gay-team from other fans." That should keep the smile on your face.
Is that the same people who said Rafer is easily the worst guard in the league maybe ever and that Mike James could be our savior?
Might be worth polling the board. Or keep a chart. There is a lot of feckless fickleness in our flock. I am only reflecting what I am reading.
