Study: Media covers Democrats more than GOP candidates

hotballa · Oct 29, 2007

I post this with the disclaimer that I know nothing about the two groups who did the study, however it was on yahoo.com so I'm assuming that they have some semblance of credibility.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071029/ap_on_el_pr/campaign_media_coverage

Study: Media narrows field of candidates

By JIM KUHNHENN, Associated Press Writer Mon Oct 29, 1:25 AM ET

WASHINGTON - When it comes to presidential politics, the news media loves front-runners. And seems to hate them, too.
ADVERTISEMENT

Within the first five months of the presidential contest, the media effectively had reduced the field to five candidates, even though there were 17 mainstream Democrats and Republicans, a study of political coverage found.

But the tone of the coverage for the top two front-runners — Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton and Republican Rudy Giuliani — hardly was friendly. Nearly four out of 10 stories were negative, more than three out of 10 were neutral and only the rest were positive.

The study by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, to be released Monday, also portrays the political press as a hidebound institution out of touch with the desires of citizens.

Among the findings:

• Stories focused more on fundraising and polls than on where candidates stood on the issues, despite a public demand for more attention to the policies, views and records of the candidates.

• The public's attention to campaign news is higher now than it was at similar points in the past two elections, but that interest is only shared by less than one in four people.

• Five candidates — Democrats Clinton and Barack Obama and Republicans Giuliani, Mitt Romney and John McCain — received more than half the coverage. Elizabeth Edwards, the cancer-stricken wife of Democrat John Edwards, received almost as much media attention as her husband.

• Democrats, overall, got more coverage — and more positive ink and airtime — than Republicans.

• Obama enjoyed the friendliest coverage of the presidential field; McCain endured the most negative. That was due in part to the media's focus on fundraising; Obama raised more than expected and McCain raised less.

The report is the most thorough analysis yet of media coverage of the 2008 presidential campaign and offers both a sober evaluation as well as a dash of guidance on how to improve. But the report's authors are not necessarily optimistic. They note that a study of the 2000 presidential election reached similar conclusions.

They argue that this election could represent a generational struggle in both parties, but that early media coverage failed to capture that fundamental tension.

"If American politics is changing," the report concluded, "the style and approach of the American press does not appear to be changing with it."

Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, said journalists face a conundrum: In a campaign that started as early as this one, why spend resources in a detailed analysis of candidates views and stances when the public is not that engaged? Or is the public not engaged because the media is focusing on tactics and insider stories that don't affect readers, viewers and listeners?

The report analyzed 1,742 articles about the presidential contest that appeared from January through May in 48 news outlets including print, online, network TV, cable and radio news and talk shows.
Click to expand...

danny317 · Oct 29, 2007

i guess they didnt consider fox news (or some people like to call faux news, or dont even consider it real news...)

cnn leans slightly towards the democrats. but they do have talk shows that lean towards the republicans also.

fox news is blatantly republican.

cbs news is democrats answer to fox.

i dont watch abc or nbc.

bbc leans slightly towards the democrats.

reuters does a good job of being neutral.

nightly news w/ jim leher on pbs is neutral and very nformative. excellent!

surrender · Oct 29, 2007

I'll be honest, I agree with the assessment that Democrats get more face time, but I think there are good reasons for it (IMO, I'm not an expert by any means):

- After Bush's terrible presidency, a lot of people probably consider a Democratic president to be an inevitability in 08. And really, it's pretty much their election to lose, even moreso than 04.
- The diversity factor - the Democrats are running black, hispanic and female candidates, while Republicans are running the stereotypical "old white men." I bet a lot of the media coverage has to do with Obama being black or Clinton being female.

Again, both of these are my opinions and are not to be taken as gospel

Rule0001 · Oct 29, 2007

surrender said:

the stereotypical "old white men."\
Click to expand...

don't forget superior...LOLOLOL jk

FranchiseBlade · Oct 29, 2007

I have seen more coverage of Democratic candidates. I think a lot of it has to do with them being the opposite party of the incumbant. They are the ones making accusations against the president, thus their campaigns have tie-ins to other news stories.

pgabriel · Oct 29, 2007

is this really a story. the two front runners for each party received negative press according to this article. of course hillary did, the biggest story on her has been the fund rasing scandal. rudy has the 9-11 worker beef.

thegary · Oct 29, 2007

they are prettier

StupidMoniker · Oct 30, 2007

Actually, Fox News was included (assuming this was the same study Michelle Malkin referenced). Fox News and MSNBC had more of their Republican coverage with positive spin, all other outlets covered favored Dems.

Forums

Study: Media covers Democrats more than GOP candidates

hotballa Contributing Member

danny317 Member

surrender Member

Rule0001 Contributing Member

FranchiseBlade Member
Supporting Member

pgabriel Educated Negro

thegary Member

StupidMoniker I lost a bet

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!

Study: Media covers Democrats more than GOP candidates

hotballa Contributing Member

danny317 Member

surrender Member

Rule0001 Contributing Member

FranchiseBlade Member Supporting Member

pgabriel Educated Negro

thegary Member

StupidMoniker I lost a bet

Share This Page

FranchiseBlade Member
Supporting Member