1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Fox 26 Houston] EEOC Sides with Ex-Mavericks Star Tarpley

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Rockets34Legend, Aug 1, 2007.

  1. Rockets34Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    23,339
    Likes Received:
    21,200
    Kind of weird to see Mavs news on a Houston news site....

    http://www.myfoxhouston.com/myfox/p...n=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=6.1.1

    HOUSTON -- For the last four years, Roy Tarpley has been trying unsuccessfully to be reinstated to the NBA. Now the former Dallas Mavericks star has the federal government on his side.

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has cited the NBA for violating the Americans With Disabilities Act and says Tarpley should be reinstated. The EEOC issued the ruling after charges made by Tarpley and his Houston-based attorney.

    "It means a lot to me that someone believes in me and they see that I was done wrong and I'm just happy to have a great deal of support." Tarpley said in an interview with FOX 26 Sports.

    At 42-years-old, Tarpley knows returning as a player is not reality. He says reinstatement would remove the black cloud that goes with being banished from the NBA and he wants to be paid for the time he was not allowed to work in the NBA.

    "The goal of the whole action is to get him reinstated, get his name back, and also to compensate him for the loss he's incurred. At this stage we have demanded in excess of $6.5 million," attorney Joe Walker said.

    "When I applied for reinstatement I was ready to play. Right now it's about me getting my name back and being able to help someone else who's struggling with issues," Tarpley said.

    Tarpley, who was once one of the dominant players in the game, has had prior issues with drug abuse. He was suspended by the league for using cocaine in 1991 and four years later banned by the NBA after testing positive for alcohol.

    Tarpley played eight years in Europe before attempting his return to the NBA.

    In the EEOC report Federal Investigator Ricardo E. Jones writes:

    "Based on the evidence collected in this investigation, I find that the Respondents (NBA) have violated the ADA. Although the Anti-Drug Policy is generally consistent with Congress' purpose in enacting the ADA, there is no evidence the charging party (Tarpley) is currently using drugs or alcohol, or has used drugs or alcohol in the past four years. Respondents (NBA) violated the ADA by not reinstating the charging party (Tarpley) based on his drug and alcohol addiction, and his record of drug and alcohol addiction. Because the NBA acted as the Mavericks' agent, the Mavericks have violated the ADA."

    In fact, the EEOC discloses from 2003 to 2004 Tarpley took and passed all drug tests mandated by the NBA with the exception of one missed due to his work schedule. The NBA declined Tarpley's request, according to the EEOC, citing the missed drug test.

    The EEOC says Tarpley then entered a Houston drug and alcohol recovery program. After passing all tests for one year he again asked the NBA in 2005 to reinstate him and was again denied.

    "They came up with the determination that the NBA did not play by the rules, that they violated his constitutional rights and violated the Americans With Disabilities Act, the way they administered the program," Walker said.

    After reaching its decision, the EEOC attempted to broker a deal between the two sides and failed.

    In a letter dated June 28 the EEOC says it decided against filing a lawsuit against the NBA but has given Tarpley 90 days to file and has retained the right to join the lawsuit or file on its own.

    Elizabeth Grossman, regional attorney for the New York district office of the EEOC, says the Commission will not comment.

    "The laws that we enforce prohibit any Commission employee from discussing any matter that is not subject of Commission litigation," Grossman said.

    The NBA declined comment.
     
  2. codell

    codell Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    715
    Tarpley could have been one of the greats.

    I am assuming this suite is quite frivelous?
     
  3. A-Train

    A-Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    39
    That'll buy a lot of blow...
     
  4. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,782
    Likes Received:
    3,703
    I hated roy tarpley, he really knew how to play against hakeem
     
  5. codell

    codell Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    715
    and he really knew how to run away from Jim Petersen :D
     
  6. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    How can they possibly know that the ONLY reason Tarpley hasn't been re-instated is because of a perceived drug issue. Maybe the NBA just doesn't think "hiring" Tarpley would be a positive move for their "company" in that he doesn't have the skill level they are looking for?
     
  7. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    ?? The NBA doesn't select players - teams do. The NBA didn't allow him to sign any teams though by not re-instating him to the league.
     
  8. BenignDMD

    BenignDMD Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    128
    He used to be one of my patients a couple years back....He even signed an old basketball card that I had of him from back when I was a little kid.

    We used to talk about his comeback attempt. He told me some crazy stories about how he got involved with drugs and what really went down.
     
    #8 BenignDMD, Aug 1, 2007
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2007
  9. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    If the teams are the ones that hire the players, how does the NBA keep anyone out? >> Rhetorical question; its obviously more complicated given the collective nature of the league.

    I just don't think you should have the right to play in the NBA just because. I don't think you should be discriminated against for race, religion, sex, etc., etc. but just because you think you should be able to play in the NBA doesn't mean you should be able to.
     
  10. rrj_gamz

    rrj_gamz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    15,595
    Likes Received:
    198
    Mavs suck...
     
  11. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,172
    Likes Received:
    29,650
    The Mavs could have been pretty good in the late 80s if Tarpley didn't mess up.
     
  12. R0ckets03

    R0ckets03 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    16,326
    Likes Received:
    2,042

    couldn't have said it better myself.
     
  13. SupermanSK

    SupermanSK Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    410
    Likes Received:
    5
    I screwed up my life not to mention my career. You suspended mr out of the NBa for my behavior. You owe me 6.5 mil for myu screw ups. :rolleyes: Tarpley sucks. That Lawyers sucks. Common sense rules!
     
  14. DarkHorse

    DarkHorse Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 1999
    Messages:
    6,752
    Likes Received:
    1,295
    This just in: Eddie Griffin sues NBA for shooting his girlfriend.

    "I could've been great" says a wizened, but broken down Griffin.
     
  15. HillBoy

    HillBoy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,939
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    Tarpley's problem wasn't blow but with grass & alcohol. He was the Dallas version of John Lucas, Lewis Lloyd & Mitchell Wiggins. When he went down, he took the Mavericks with him. I don't feel too bad for the Mavericks however because they knew he'd tested positive at Michigan for weed before the NBA draft and they still drafted him in spite of the potential ramifications from the NBA drug policy that had been enacted in response to the drug excesses of the time.
     
  16. Williamson

    Williamson JOSH CHRISTOPHER ONLY FAN

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    15,809
    Likes Received:
    19,953
    He did make mistakes, but he wasn't allowed to correct them. There are very few fields in which you can be permanently barred. Physician and Lawyer are the only two that come to mind. Bottom line, if I'm an accountant and I get fired from my firm for drug use, if I rehabilitate myself I will have the oppurtunity to apply to other firms and hope for the best. After Tarpley was back in his right track he was denied the oppurtunity to even apply for a job with a new team, despite the fact that is the job he was best qualified for. It makes sense to me that that is at least worth examining whether that is just. Had he been able to attempt a comeback and found no teams were willing to gamble on him or take a PR hit, there would be no issue here whatsoever.

    I know he isn't without blame by any stretch of the imagination, but I still find stories like his tragic. Though if I'm to be honest, it's more because I hate the idea that he and (possibly later the NBA) robbed us of what may well have been a great career.
     
  17. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,172
    Likes Received:
    29,650
    Bottom line, if Tarpley were an accountant, he wouldn't have been paid millions to do his job, and wouldn't be on the news when he screwed up with drug and alcohol. There's a reason why the punishment is so harsh in Tarpley's profession. They are millionaire public figures, like it or not. You get more, you have more responsibilities. That's fairness for life to me.
     
  18. Williamson

    Williamson JOSH CHRISTOPHER ONLY FAN

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    15,809
    Likes Received:
    19,953

    I agree with much of that. I certainly agree they have more responsibilities. I'll even go so far as to say it sickens me when people throw away the kind of oppurtunities and god-given gifts that guys like Roy Tarpley had. But I still fail to see how it's fair. Vin Baker, for example, trashed his career with an alcohol addiction. They never ran him out of the NBA and teams kept taking him on hoping the gamble would pay big dividends. Shawn Kemp struggled with alcohol, cocaine and food and all of that was public, but he has still been allowed to audition for many a teams. Ruben Patterson is a convicted sex offender and he's still getting paid millions and millions of dollars. A CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER! But Tarpley wasn't even allowed to contact teams to request a tryout?

    Again, if every team in the NBA chose not to try him out because he has burned every bridge, or is considered too big of a risk or too bad for PR, that's fine. But to not even be allowed to ask to try out? It seems a bit extreme to me. And quite frankly, I hope it does go to court. I don't even care if Tarpley recieves any sort of compensation, but I would like to see a legal precedent set that would allow future players that rehabilitate themselves the oppurtunity to redeem themselves if teams are still interested.

    p.s. Thank god Vernon Maxwell recieved so many "second chances". Could we have won our first championship without him?
     
  19. jts10

    jts10 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    He didn't have a disability. He had weak will power and used poor decisions.
     
  20. redgoose

    redgoose Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm don't know what you do for a living, but it seems like something that would require a Doctor/Lawyer/Therapist patient confidentiality agreement. Would you care to give us more details about the drugs and what went down? ;)

    Being serious, every job i've ever had i've had (except Grandy's when i was 16...lol), i had to sign a form willing to take random drug tests whenever they decided, usually after i would already take one to get the job. Had i ever failed one, i would be fired. :(

    Yes, if i ever failed one i could clean up and go work for another company or one that didn't submit to drug testing. However, the NBA is the company that he failed the tests for. Why would they have to take him back? :confused: They are a private company so shouldn't they be able to do the same things most companies in America do? A company can choose to bring you back after you rehabbed, but i don't know of any that have too. If i fail a drug test and get fired tomorrow can i sue by saying it's a disability? :cool:
     

Share This Page