1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

ESPN Readers Prefer Dog Killing to Gambling

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Jeff, Jul 23, 2007.

Tags:
  1. AstroRocket

    AstroRocket Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 1999
    Messages:
    11,814
    Likes Received:
    458

    Naw, that's tenderizing.
     
  2. TBar

    TBar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    3,033
    Likes Received:
    1
    I bow to your brilliance.

    Breeding special "fighting" cows and putting them in a ring to fight to the death- including training the fighting cows with weaker animals- yeah - that would be a crime against morality/ nature.

    I still eat the occasional hamburger-but I doubt the meat came from a fighting cow match.

    Dr. Of Dunk- I'm not PETA- I even like the occasional hunt-I do not like cruelty.

    I kill the deer/hog quick and eat the meat.
     
  3. rockets-#1

    rockets-#1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,895
    Likes Received:
    9
    I absolutely love dogs, and the idea of dog fighting is totally disgusting. Still, with the wording of the poll, I went with the Donaghy option. As a sports poll, the dog fighting doesn't affect the sport in any way. The ref bs impacts my favorite sport in a major way. What's more disturbing to the game and its integrity? The betting.
     
  4. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,947
    Likes Received:
    41,508
    [​IMG]
     
  5. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,822
    Likes Received:
    3,714

    a bull isn't man's best friend. :rolleyes:
     
  6. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    Even if the dog fighting weren't bad enough, the way Vick killed the dogs that he "had" to kill was disgusting.
     
  7. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,822
    Likes Received:
    3,714
    did anyone here senator byrd's comments from last thursday apparently. heard them on espn this morning. apparently he is an advocate for the ethical treatment of dogs are at least an adament dog lover. he was pretty emotional
     
  8. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,947
    Likes Received:
    41,508
    You know what, I actually enjoy bullfighting and don't want it banned. Now I know its inhumane the reality of it can be ugly (FYI the horses are basically torturted and murdered too, not just the bull) but, especially if you've read any books about it and seen some matches, especially in Spain in a place like Sevilla or Madrid - it's just too culturally and hstorically important to go away. And some of it is also really cool to watch especially if you read Death In the Afternoon or The Dangerous Summer .

    I don't like dogfighting and see no reason why it should be legal, but I am not going to kid myself and say that there's a huge qualitative difference between that and bullfighting. The line isn't as clear as we'd want it to be. You could also say the same goes, to a lesser extent, to horse racing, dog racing, and rodeo, where the animals aren't exactly treated with dignity.

    And don't even get started on the commerical livestock industry. If Dogfighting is animal torture, then the livestock industry is animal genocide.

    Now I'm not saying that any of this should be banned, but I'm saying that there are fundamental conflicts and contradictions with the way we approach the issue of animal rights (especially when it comes to dogs).

    PETA is usually an organization that (rightfully) draws a lot of ridicule from the mainstream - but on this issue at least they are consistent.
     
  9. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,822
    Likes Received:
    3,714
    sam you're fighting a losing effort, cow's don't comfort lonely grandfathers.
     
  10. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    Read the poll again...it says nothing about killing dogs. It talks about the "alleged dogfighting".

    The wording is what throws the poll off. Had they said anything about killing dogs in the poll, Im sure the results would differ.
     
  11. percicles

    percicles Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    11,989
    Likes Received:
    4,446
    There's a certain artistry in bullfighting. A sort of ballet between man and beast. Dogfighting not so much.
     
  12. dylan

    dylan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2000
    Messages:
    1,349
    Likes Received:
    18
    It's too bad that they can't be less hypocritcal in many other areas, such as their Senior Vice President who takes insulin that has been tested on animals or the killing of 1000's of animal they took in for shelter.

    As an aside I have long held that bull fighting is no better than **** or dog fighting. It is slow torture to both the bull and the horse (as you said). The rodeo isn't too much better but at least the goal with the rodeo isn't to kill the animals. Now I admit that I may be biased (growing up I sure as hell went to more rodeo's than bull fights) and view bull fighting with much more disdain than rodeos but if I had to choose between eliminating both or none I would go with both.
     
  13. dylan

    dylan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2000
    Messages:
    1,349
    Likes Received:
    18
    See, this kind of quote makes me hate bull fighting even more. A "certain artistry"? "Sort of ballet?" How about slowly cutting and torturing a scared and confused bull? I'm truly not an avid animal-rights activist (I believe in medical testing, hunting, etc) but just don't see how anyone can watch a bullfight and be okay with it.
     
  14. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,822
    Likes Received:
    3,714
    the outrage is particularly hypocritcal in the south where as you say, rodeos and hunting are big business.

    but hey,
    dogs catch frisbees
     
  15. KePoW

    KePoW Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2002
    Messages:
    1,527
    Likes Received:
    180
    hey pgabriel, I haven't followed the 2 vick threads completely, but why do you hate dogs so much
     
  16. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,822
    Likes Received:
    3,714

    I don't hate dogs, I hate hypocrisy


    edit: that's a classic "why do you hate america" debate tatic
     
  17. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,080
    Likes Received:
    15,272
    I think fixing NBA games is a bigger deal than killing dogs.

    Who, btw, is looking at more jail time, Donaghy or Vick?
     
  18. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    I agree with this. The NFL will still be here despite the horrendous allegations levied against Vick, guilty or not. The NBA, especially if this does reach farther than one official, has a very good chance of suffering for a long time because of this scandal. When the integrity of the game itself is brought into question, that's worse than one person doing something horrible outside of the sport.

    I'm guessing and hoping that's how the majority of the respondents read the question.

    Take sports out of the equation and of course it's dog fighting.
     
  19. professorjay

    professorjay Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    388
    Not really on-topic, but the NFL is so far ahead in being 'America's Sport' that the NFL would probably fair pretty well if they faced game fixing by refs. People's insane love of football would blind them.
     
  20. TBar

    TBar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    3,033
    Likes Received:
    1
    Per Sam Fisher:


    "I don't like dogfighting and see no reason why it should be legal, but I am not going to kid myself and say that there's a huge qualitative difference between that and bullfighting. The line isn't as clear as we'd want it to be. You could also say the same goes, to a lesser extent, to horse racing, dog racing, and rodeo, where the animals aren't exactly treated with dignity.

    And don't even get started on the commerical livestock industry. If Dogfighting is animal torture, then the livestock industry is animal genocide.

    Now I'm not saying that any of this should be banned, but I'm saying that there are fundamental conflicts and contradictions with the way we approach the issue of animal rights (especially when it comes to dogs). "

    **************************************

    These are valid points. I do not support the Rodeo, Bull fighting, **** fighting, animal racing, or for that matter-the circus or zoo. I do occasionally hunt, I wear leather work boots and shoes and eat the occasional hamburger and even less often - lean tenderloin steak. I drive a truck to work where diesel powered equipment burns fossil fuels. Part of my job is to install asphalt and concrete paving- which create runoff problems.

    In those ways I am contributing to destruction of animal life.

    I think killing and fighting dogs is sociopathic.

    It does not matter what I think- Vick will be forgotten in one year and dogs will still be fought.
     

Share This Page