lmao... reminds me of the borat quote "What's up with it, Vanilla face? Me and my homie Azamat just parked our slab outside. We're looking for somewhere to post up our Black asses for the night. So, uh, bang bang, skeet skeet, *****. Just a couple of pimps, no hos."
Nice win tonight by the summer league team. Lewis doesn't look half bad. I need to start watching more of these games before I begin a detailed pentagon report on who looks good and doesn't. I've got a feeling I won't need too many games to evaluate Brooks though. Scoring, handles, passing... kid is straight-up ELECTRIC.
Just from a couple of summer league games you conclude he is better than Chuck? Also Harris is more a SF than PF. I think Harris, Landry, and Brooks are prerty impressive. Butler has some moves, but he still looked out of shape...
I know that. But still he is just so talented. Not as strong as James, not as experienced as Alston to run the team. But he got a bright future ahead of him. He can shoot, handle the ball and find the open man. Got a nice rythm all the time. High iq. Not to mention lightening quick. We can only hope Alston is as good as scoring, we would have won the whole thing last year. Over all I am glad we got him. We got one pg too many though.
Harris is a SF but plays like a PF. He always plays under the hoop. Novak is a bust. Butler looks bad.
No doubt about it, Harris is better than Chuck hayes hands down... Mike Harris is more athletic, quicker, better offensive player, He's also a banger on the boards and he's he a hustler that plays hard. What does Chuck hayes have over Harris? Probbaly better rebounder and thats all..
Chuck is a starting PF in the L, Harris played in the NBDL. I like Harris too, but there's no way he's as good as Hayes at this point. Also, Hayes is a pretty good defender and I haven't seen much D from Harris lately.
I think they looked tired, Harris, Brooks, Landry.....only Novak can still brick at certain consistency.
Brooks = Stone Cold Baller. He may get abused at the next level, may not. I really want to see what he can do with and against top flight competition. My prediction; he has got "it." Not many players do. Is he big enough? Not physically, but in every other way, he is. Interesting player, definitely worth watching. Star in the making or another JIII? A year or two will tell. My money is on "Star." I think he can do more than Rafer right now. James will start, but what if he moves to SG, then Brooks might get some minutes. I like fire, I like gutsy, I like fiesty, I like this kid.
what does chucky have over harris? How about the best post defender on our team sound? How bout strongest player on our team sound? Hayes is a 4, harris is a 3. There's no way he's going to help us at the 4 spot. I like him though. Very active, and as you said very athletic. I have yet to see him hit more than one jumper in a game. Could be a very good defender, and showed flashes of it in the games we've played, but he's still getting beat off the dribble way too many times. But then again, noone in the SL is playing defense. Harris' offense right now comes from putbacks and scrap buckets. Him being more athletic than chuck doesn't make him a better offensive player.
