1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

MJ? Good. Now get rid of Rafer.

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by CriscoKidd, Jun 14, 2007.

  1. Plowman

    Plowman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    13,170
    Likes Received:
    15,027
    I would tend to believe Rafer will be shipped out in a deal for a 4.

    For 1,VSpan is going to open some eyes with the ball in his hands initiating the offense.I see him growing under Adelman.

    Until then,we have to make sure our depth is quality at the 1.

    Les,CD,Morey,Rick Adelman........ They will make sure that this time we're not going to a gunfight with a knife.
    The Rockets are poised for multiple title runs if we continue to put the team together this way and stay healthy.

    Grab the 4,another1,and a swingman.Upgrade athleticism across the board.
     
  2. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,280
    Likes Received:
    9,161
    Please send Rafer far, far away in a deal for a PF.
     
  3. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,280
    Likes Received:
    9,161
    I love your optimism, but I have no basis for believing that Les, CD, and Morey are going to work miracles. Personally, based on recent history, I am not sure they can find their butts with both hands ergo the James/Alston trade.
     
  4. Barkley

    Barkley Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,120
    Likes Received:
    0
    It woulde be perfect. Rafer Alston for Chris Wilcox... :cool:
     
  5. HillBoy

    HillBoy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,940
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    I happen to believe that those 3 couldn't find their butts if they were locked in a closet together with flashlights and a drawing showing where the butt is located on the human body.
     
  6. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    lets take it easy on the b****ing and whinning, i think we've heard enough.
     
  7. AussieRocket

    AussieRocket Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    4
    This deal makes more and more sense:

    Sura + Rafer for Camby.

    1. Denver is waay into lux tax next year as Melo's extension kicks in and they still pay max money for K-Mart and AI
    2. Denver hes zero (0) point guards under contract.
    3. Rumor is that Steve Blake is looking for a big payday, unlikely Denver brings him back.
    4. Denver is loaded with big men: Camby, Nene, K-Mart, Reggie Evans, Kleiza, Najera
    5. George Karl coached Rafer for three years at Milwakee, he knows him.
    6. The deal simultaneously cuts Denver's payroll, becuase of Sura, and brings them a starting PG.
    7. Sura+Alston may look like too little for the reigning DPOY, however, it is quite obvious to everyone that Camby's stock is at an all-time high and can only go down from here. If he has another couple of years like the this last one, Rockets come out winners, however, it is also very possible that he blows his knee/back again and is just another hobbled big guy in his mid-thirties for the rest of his contract.

    It's a very viable deal. Now imagine the AI+Skip backcourt 10 years ago, wouldn't that be something to watch....
     
  8. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,873
    Likes Received:
    3,222
    Add Snyder/Nahera and it makes a lot of sense for Nugs (and Rox).
     
  9. stq

    stq Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    0
    MJ will be coming off the bench, playing Head's role.
    Rafer will start.

    Head will be packaged with some other players to trade for a starting PF.



    can't believe there are so many fans who wants to start MJ over Rafer....are you kidding me?? MJ is a ball hog..and he can't even get along with KG, and worst of all, he can't create offense/pass the ball to Yao.

    we over played Rafer in the playoff, so MJ is a welcome addition for a back PG/SG.

    but trade away Rafer just because MJ is here? hell no !
     
  10. stq

    stq Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    0
    MJ is like an older/upgraded/more expensive version of L.Head.....he's a gunner, not a pure PG...

    I think by signing MJ, we are probably going to trade Head away, Head does have some value on the market.
     
  11. JD317²

    JD317² Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, I think Head is next as well.
    I'd hate to lose him though.
     
  12. tsunami

    tsunami Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2006
    Messages:
    3,095
    Likes Received:
    1
    too late, the deal is done. swallow it.
     
  13. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    This is r****ded, who do you think plays PG in case Mike James needs a break or gets injured?

    Luther "Look Ma, No Handles!" Head?
    John "Carlton from Fresh Prince" Lucas?
    Vassilis "My name is Greek for 'Turnovers'" Spanoulis?
     
  14. BEXCELANT

    BEXCELANT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,570
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would really like to see what V-Span can do. I don't think he was given a fair chance in the NBA. I was watching the preseason Video on V-span and this is what I took away from it. I think the guy has extremely quick hands and feet. He is able to establish position in taking a charge and that's no small feat in the NBA. He's very good defensively and stripping the ball away from the opposing team's guards. I think he turned the ball over a lot but that's getting used to the speed of the NBA.

    One more thing, V-span turnovers vs Alston's missed shots. Which one is worse? Isn't a missed shot from Alston about the same as a turnover from V-Span? Could V-Span outscore Alston in a 40 minute period? If so then V-Span and his turnovers might completely offset Alston and his shooting. In which case, you'd want V-Span starting instead of Alston or at least splitting minutes.
    <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BH7bvPMOyUg"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BH7bvPMOyUg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
     

Share This Page