1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

A New Bryant-O'Neal Duo May Form?

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Frodo, May 31, 2007.

  1. doublebogey

    doublebogey Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1
    Assume the trade goes through, which one is a better combo: Yao + T-Mac or Kobe + Jermaine?

    And the West is getting tougher and tougher, holy crap.
     
  2. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,270
    Likes Received:
    13,733
    I expect the Lakers to make a run at the same PGs we are targeting. Francis, James, and Atkins. Maybe even Billups, the LA factor has been known to work wonders. If they don't land O'Neal they would certainly look to Kidd. No matter what they do the Lakers will be a stronger team next year.
     
  3. The_Yoyo

    The_Yoyo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2001
    Messages:
    16,683
    Likes Received:
    2,873

    they are making a push for mo williams from what i heard through the owner of the company i work for who is pretty well connected with the lakers.
     
  4. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,270
    Likes Received:
    13,733
    Forgot about him. Definitely makes sense.
     
  5. Tfor3

    Tfor3 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    20,959
    Likes Received:
    25,237
  6. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    145
    Jermaine is easily the worst of the 4 but the gap between Kobe and whoever you consider our best player is large enough to cover that disparity. So they might even have a better duo than us, while both our supporting casts are absolute garbage.

    The West just keeps getting better. We definitely need to push for some talent upgrade.
     
  7. Bank_Shot

    Bank_Shot Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2005
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't think Jermaine O'neal is that great. The Pacers team built around him has never won anything. Indiana started to go downhill soon after Reggie Miller retired. For a big man, O'neal's shooting percentage is not very good. He is a great shot blocker, but his one on one defense is questional at times. Jermaine's biggest problem, though, is that he just can't stay healthy. I'd rather have Lamar Odom than O'neal.
     
  8. ghettocheeze

    ghettocheeze Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2006
    Messages:
    7,325
    Likes Received:
    9,134
    I don't see what's in it for Indiana?

    Lamar Odom is an ok player but coming off injuries and possible surgery. Andrew Bynum is a long term project and mostly over-hyped by Los Angeles media.

    If I were Indy I would do the following:

    Jermaine O'Neal: $19,710,000
    Troy Murphy: $9,206,349

    For

    Lamar Odom: $13,524,000
    Kwame Brown: $9,075,000
    Andrew Bynum: $2,172,000
    Vladmir Radmonavic: $5,632,200
    2007 19th pick overall pick

    That is the bare minimum I want from LA.

    Indy gets rid of Troy Murphy's huge contract. Gets an expiring contract in Kwame Brown and Odom has 2 years left. Plus you pick a decent shooter like Rad and a 1st round pick.

    Now If I were Los Angeles the I would scrap this trade and purpose the following:

    Los Angeles trades:
    Kwame Brown: $9,075,000
    Vladmir Radmonavic: $5,632,200

    Portland trades:
    Zach Randolph: $13,333,333

    The Blazers are desperately trying to dump Randolph and save a ton of money. In return they get Kwame Brown whose contract expires next summer and a good shooter and role player. Overall good trade for Portland especially now that the Greg Oden era is about to begin.

    The Lakers take a huge risk with a headcase like Randolph but they love this trades because it doesn't involve Odom or Bynum. So now they have good inside presence at power forward and still have tradeable assets to maybe find a good PG. Radmonavic was a misfit for them and they get rid of him very easily. Overall good trade for Los Angeles and they can now fill some other holes via trades.
     
  9. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,176
    Likes Received:
    29,656
    I don't think O'Neal is better than Odom + Bynum. If this goes through, it might set the Lakers back, which I am all for it.

    Bynum has great potential. If I were the Lakers, I'd keep him. It might take him 4 or 5 years to be fully developed. That's gonna be Kobe's last leg. Of course, Kobe wants to win now. He couldn't care less about the Lakers' future after he's done.
     
  10. Jonhty

    Jonhty Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    1,704
    Likes Received:
    4
  11. pradaxpimp

    pradaxpimp Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,025
    Likes Received:
    71
    Negative. The productivity of Tmac/Yao is much higher than Joneal and Kobe. IMO of course. We might lack the killer instinct of Kobe but I hardly think that joneal is in Yao's league.
     
  12. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,654
    Likes Received:
    12,096
    As a Pacers fan, I would love to trade JO for Odom and Bynum. We definitely win that trade. I suppose the main issues would be whatever filler is thrown in to even things out, such as draft picks.
     
  13. pacertom

    pacertom Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    405
    I agree, and I also would hope the trade could help the pathetic Pacer backcourt and include Farmar and/or the Lakers #19 pick (Law could MAYBE slide to there, or Crittendon).

    It might have to be a 3-team deal if Odom insisted on an extension to be a happy camper with this trade.
     
  14. emjohn

    emjohn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    Jermaine O'Neal may be able to put about numbers, but he's not a guy that dominates in the paint. The blocks (usually 2.5/game ballpark) are nice, but he's a lightweight in the post. He's All-Star material, but not franchise star material. A good, but not dominating rebounder (Odom by himself is just about his equal), a good but not dominating scorer in the blocks (which may be unfair since he's more F than C).

    Myself personally, I'd be more drawn to an Elton Brand type that can excel underneath the basket. But maybe it's a better fit to have a guy that can play further out and keep the path to the basket clear for Kobe.

    But I agree that this trade, were it to go through, would not make the Lakers a better team.
    Economically: Jermaine ($19.7 next yr) vs Odom ($13.5) and Bynum ($2.2 - rookie deal){plus someone else and a pick? this barely fits the 125% rule} gives Indiana cap relief and flexibility (always easier to move multiple players at smaller money than one making big dollars) to help them rebuild.

    On the court: Jermaine's already getting a little bit gimpy with his knee. He may be only 28, but he's got 11 years of pro ball on the odometer. 82 game seasons + playoffs is a lot more wear and tear than 30 games + tourny in college.

    Addition/Subtraction: Jermaine offers much more on D, at least as a help defender. But there's a rebounding deficit (Odom + Bynum = over 15/game, JO = 10), scoring deficit (23-20), and a drop off in depth. Odom's versatility is a huge loss. But that could be my bias for uber-skilled guys like him and Marion. Still, it certainly doesn't help with the Lakers' problems with ballhandling. The triangle offense wants constant movement of the players and the ball. How does moving Odom for O'Neal help that at all?

    I personally think this'll be a lateral move at best for LA.

    Evan
     
  15. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,270
    Likes Received:
    13,733
    That trade is absolutely ridiculous and is nowhere near reality. Why would the Nuggets trade the defensive player of the year, the glue of that team for Brown? The article suggests caproom. 9mil in cap space isn't going to put them under! The Nuggets are obviously a franchise that wants to win now (Karl, Iverson) so why the hell would they take steps back? I don't even think they would trade Camby for Bynum if it was possible monetarily.
     
  16. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    yao has a clear advantage over JO... the same clear advantage kobe has over tmac. additionally, kobe is probably the best closer in the game. he knows how to win games in the last few minutes.

    obviously this is all speculation, and we might both be mistaken. the only clear cut advantage we might have is a superior supporting cast. while they gut their team this summer to land o'neal, we will be adding a 3rd scorer and hopfully some bench help.
     
  17. intersync

    intersync Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    2
    years behind? they're the lakers, they got malone and payton with a snap of their fingers
     
  18. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    winning 3 championships in a row will do that for you. that was 5 years ago.

    they are about to gut thier team in order to bring in an allstar. they will be even thinner on the bench then they are now.
     

Share This Page