1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

What to do with Marc Jackson?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Eddie Griffin, Sep 20, 2001.

?

what would you do with Marc Jackson?

  1. Let him sign somewhere else

    6 vote(s)
    8.2%
  2. Sign his as a free agent if you can

    44 vote(s)
    60.3%
  3. You're ready to trade some players for him

    23 vote(s)
    31.5%
  1. Eddie Griffin

    Eddie Griffin Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2001
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you were CD...
     
  2. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    I guess we're even so far...
     
  3. ROCS4LIFE

    ROCS4LIFE Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'll go with signing Marc Jackson. Then when Taylor returns trade Jackson for a true center.
     
  4. KALIKULI

    KALIKULI Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2000
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    16
    Jackson can temporarily fill in some vacancy, for now! But till the end of the season next year when there is available true center, thats when we can sign Jackson and trade him.
     
  5. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    I say sign him for this year and the future. The chances of us getting a decent "true" center are probably slim and none, so why not have two above average power forwards?
     
  6. fadeaway

    fadeaway Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    14,704
    Likes Received:
    1,193
    Marc Jackson is just a flash in the pan. Signing him, especially for the long term, would be a huuuuuuuge mistake.
     
  7. man532

    man532 Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2001
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    0
    No doubt, I trade Walt Williams and Kenny Thomas for Marc Jackson immediately.

    If I see Walt throw up another low percentage shooting season, the Rocks deserve the Lotto. In addition, if Kenny Thomas does the spin move again, I'm sending him to Afgan. Walt and Kenny should live at Westside and sleep on air mattresses.

    Kenny is not the answer at PF, too short and shooting percentage and selection is horrible.
     
  8. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    I said I'd be willing to trade for him.
     
  9. Hottoddie

    Hottoddie Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2000
    Messages:
    3,075
    Likes Received:
    15
    ...assuming that I get the Medical exception, I send Golden State a future #1 pick to not match my offer to Jackson. I then offer him $2-3 mill to start out.

    After I have him in the fold, I send Walt to Washington for Jahidi White & my front line questions are answered.

    I never realized just how easy it is to be a GM. :D
     
  10. Stevierebel

    Stevierebel Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2001
    Messages:
    3,140
    Likes Received:
    119
    I would take Jackson. He is better than the center that we have now. I don't think he will be a bust because of his background. He seems like a really hardworking person who is greatful for what he has. Just my opinion !
     
  11. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,438
    Likes Received:
    5,260
    I think Swopa and aelliott have chimed in on this thing already, but I don't think teams can sign-and-trade their RESTRICTED free agents. Therefore, Golden State could not sign Jackson and then trade him to Houston for anything.

    Like Swopa said, if Golden State can make us take on Bob Sura's hefty contract in exchange for Walt Williams's expiring contract, then they might agree not to match any offer the Rockets make to Marc. There is both a pro and a con to this deal. The con is that this will probably have luxury tax implications down the line once the Rockets re-sign Francis. They'd be paying a backup guard a heckuva lot of money. However, the pro is that Sura is (in my opinion) a good guard and a superior player to Williams. Sura is an ideal third guard to have off the bench. He plays both PG and SG. And he's 6-5. He looks like a bigger version of Jason Williams, but with more game and more under control. And with hair. From a purely basketball standpoint, getting Sura AND Jackson for Williams seems like a great move, though.
     
  12. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,209
    Likes Received:
    4,162
    I offer Jackson a 3 year deal guaranteed starting at 3 mill (assumed DPE), with a 4th year team option, and a 5th year player option. The team option safeguards us against him sucking badly and/or the price of decent big men going through the roof.

    If necessary, offer GS the Toronto pick.

    I'd start Jackson at PF, with Cato at center, and move him to center if:
    a.) Cato sucks (KT to PF)
    b.) KT plays well
    c.) Griff plays well

    Or injuries screwing everything up occur. Note that without the DPE, we have no real chance of getting Jackson.

    Side note on KT: I actually like a lot of KT's moves. He just can't finish to save his life.
     
  13. drpepper

    drpepper Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2001
    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just curious. What is Sura's contract like?
    I think they'll rather trade Mookie.
     
  14. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,260
    Likes Received:
    14,702
    I don't know Sura's contract,but I agree with you Dr.Pepper that they would rather trade Mookie instead of Sura.
     
  15. Severe Rockets Fan

    Severe Rockets Fan Takin it one stage at a time...

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2001
    Messages:
    5,923
    Likes Received:
    1,490
    Do we HAVE to trade for sura?:( Isn't he your typical "lots of shots, low percentage" kind of guy?
     
  16. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,438
    Likes Received:
    5,260
    drpepper, saleem--The Warriors would DEFINITELY rather trade Sura than Blaylock. Mookie's contract expires at the end of THIS season. Sura's deal pays him an average of $6 mil per season, and I believe he has at least three years left on the deal. With the Warriors having 17 players already under contract, it's a no-brainer that they'd rather have a contract that they can dump after this season than a big contract for a bench player.
     
  17. Eddie Griffin

    Eddie Griffin Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2001
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bob Sura contract $4,913,334 $5,540,001 $6,166,667.
    Too much... :(
     
  18. Swami

    Swami Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 1999
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    2
    Excellent post NIKE! The DPE could salvage our season. The Rockets need a 4/5 much more than a 4. Rudy loves versatile players. Jackson would give us that 4th scorer in the offense that we were looking forward to before Mo Taylors unfortunate injury. Jackson clearly insures against injury or poor performance by Cato/Collier. At that price, Jackson should be tradeable in the future if required.

    KT is probably our best rebounder (an area of need this season) and also a good passer for a big man (which might help under the new rules). I hope KT gets a shot this year.

    Is there any chance of a 3 team deal using Walt Williams to land Jackson? The last thing GS needs is another forward, but mabey we could involve someone else in a trade if we do not get the DPE.
     
  19. Eddie Griffin

    Eddie Griffin Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2001
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Eddie Griffin is better rebounder than KT, and he's a better player... much better.

    ;)
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now