While well-suited for effective stimulation of the penis, coitus is much less effective at stimulating the ****oris, the seat of the female orgasm, owing to its size and location well outside of the vagina. Many women, up to 70 percent rarely or never achieve orgasm during coitus without simultaneous direct stimulation of the ****oris with the fingers or other implement. Most women do require such direct stimulation, and ignorance or disregard of this fact is seen as a common cause of female anorgasmia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_intercourse And, 100% of all women fake it regularly to save your fragile little ego. If you want to get your women off you are most likely going to have to do it through masterbation or cunnilingus, better yet watch the game and let her use her vibrator.
George: Food and sex, those are my two passions. It's only natural to combine them. Jerry: Natural? Sex is about love between a man and a woman, not a man and a sandwich. George: Jerry, I'm not suggesting getting rid of the girl. She's integral. Jerry: Maybe instead of trying to satisfy two of your needs, how about satisfying one of somebody else's?
Yeah, I had kind of forgotten about this forum. I can't believe I'm the only person here that this has happened to. Anyway, I like the BJ to be finished to conclusion, instead of as a prelude to something else. I like the from out of nowhere unexpected BJ, like you are just sitting around bored watching TV or something with your woman, and suddenly your fly is unzipped and your knob gets slobbered on...
Hate to see Fatty and Deckard, two great guys on this board disagree. Hey you're both right!!! My girl needs a good 2 min break after orgasm to start again. She will literally grab me and tell me "don't move" when she hits it. And frankly, I rather enjoy sharing the moment (you can feel it too if you're still!). But hey it might be different for different people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_orgasm#Female_multiple_orgasm Female multiple orgasm Unlike men, women either do not have a refractory period or have a very short one and thus can experience a second orgasm soon after the first; some women can even follow this with additional consecutive orgasms. This is known as having multiple orgasms. After the initial orgasm, subsequent climaxes may be stronger or more pleasurable as the stimulation accumulates. Research shows that about 13% of women experience multiple orgasms[citation needed]; a larger number may be able to experience this with the proper stimulation (such as a vibrator) and frame of mind. However, some women's ****orises and nipples are very sensitive after orgasm, making additional stimulation initially painful. It is possible to engage in deep, rapid breaths while continuing stimulation and making a conscious intention to release the pain and tension during and after sex. Doing this can allow for the intense stimulation to be interpreted not as painful but as intensely pleasurable.[14]
I am the master of the C.*.I.T. Remember this ******* face. Whenever you see C.*.I.T., you'll see this ****ing face. I make that s**t work. It does whatever the f*** I tell it to. No one rules the C.*.I.T like me. Not this little f***.
Wow...what a debate...sorry to bump but this same girl said she went to a sorority event and a lot of the women were talking about finally having a "o" or lucky to have one at least once a month...of course, most of these ladies were married, and she can just have them easily...All women are different... I still stand by saying multiple o's are possible and yes, there has to be a break as to sensitivity, but it is achievable...one may be a baby one and then the big one...you can't fake wetness...a lot of things have to happen,like stamina, positions, emotional connection, etc...whew, I feel better...
Like men (and boys, as it may apply in this thread. ), all women are different in how their bodies respond. Obviously. Certainly, not every woman I was with during my most active era, regarding multiple partners, had multiple O's. Many, however, did. It's the sweeping generalizations that I disagree with.