1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Best Possible Lineup

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by ubigred, Jul 22, 2006.

  1. RocketTiger

    RocketTiger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gooden is taller,quicker, better defender and alot younger. Shot is not quite as good but its still solid.
     
  2. WallofYao

    WallofYao Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    1
    duuddee. awesome thread. :rolleyes:
    Why would we give up so much for Battier to be on the bench? If you want a line-up with quickness, this would be your starting line-up(one that I favor):

    PG:Alston
    SG:Snyder
    SF:Tmac
    PF:Battier
    C:Yao

    but if you would rather have size, which is also nice, you start:

    PG:Alston
    SG:Tmac
    SF:Battier
    PF:Jho
    C:Yao

    but I think the first line-up will be our line-up. Tmac can no longer play the 2 like he use too, and Tmac wants and likes to play at the 3. Of course Battier cant play the 2, so he will be our 4, and Snyder is a good slasher, and if he can get a jumpshot, we're a strong team. That's the "best possible lineup".
     
  3. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    He's a MUCH better rebounder and finisher around the basket. I mean, in those two areas, which are very much lacking for the Rockets other than Yao, Gooden is far ahead of Juwan.
     
  4. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    I'll just give what I think the Rockets starting line up will be.

    Point Guard - Bob Sura
    Shooting Guard - Kirk Snyder
    Small Forward - Tracy McGrady
    Power Forward - Shane Battier
    Center - Yao Ming
     
  5. OGKashMoney

    OGKashMoney Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,093
    Likes Received:
    35
    But we dont really need someone who finishes around thr basket. When Yao is on the floor we need a 4 with shooting ability. When he isnt, we could use a Gooden but then again, Synder and TMac can slash to the basket. Its a matter of the price!
     
  6. Drift Monkey

    Drift Monkey Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2006
    Messages:
    731
    Likes Received:
    124
    Hillarious when people put Sura as the starting 1....
     
  7. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    It's just as hillarious when people claim that Alston is as good a point guard as Sura.
     
  8. ubigred

    ubigred Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    7,363
    Likes Received:
    127

    i would take alston over a knee surgery and back surgery Sura. ANYDAY!!
     
  9. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,264
    Likes Received:
    14,703
    Sura did better on the fast break but Rafer was able to get the ball down to Yao in the low post better than him and James. All three of them had their limitations as PG's but James and Sura were much better scorers and Rafer isn't an ideal passer by any means.
     
    #29 saleem, Jul 25, 2006
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2006
  10. prv1981

    prv1981 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    17
    06- 07 Starting lineup

    Alston
    Snyder
    TMac
    Battier
    Yao

    Book It!
     
  11. H-Dub

    H-Dub Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh yea :rolleyes:
     
  12. H-Dub

    H-Dub Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seattle was also a great scoring team. But Hayes is better than him any way for cheap. Hayes actually has a better rebounding rate and he was potential.
     
  13. ymc

    ymc Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,969
    Likes Received:
    36
    Should this go to Random Trade thread? This lineup is not possible unless we do two random trades that are not likely to happen.
     
  14. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390

    That's bologna. Howards eFG% from jumperland is 43%. Gooden's eFg% is 42.1%. Gooden is just as effective as Howard with the jumper. But when you look at the rest of the numbers, there is NO comparison. Gooden blows Juwan out of the water in overall FG% and eFG%. And the rebounding and shot blocking numbers are at opposite ends of the spectrum.

    Gooden is much more than a young Howard because Howard has never been very good. You are way overblowing the effectiveness of Howard's jump shot. It ain't all that. It's just the bag of chips.

    If all else fails, we should pursue a S&T deal with Cleveland, offering to take Damon Jones' contract off their hands with Gooden in exchange for Howard and Head.
     
    #34 jopatmc, Jul 25, 2006
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2006
  15. chris_Rocket

    chris_Rocket Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed 100%
    there's no need to sign Evens!! I still prefer J.Jeffres of Washington ;)
     
  16. Sextuple Double

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    0
    If we don't make an attempt for Jeffries it will be a debacle.
     
  17. JimRaynor55

    JimRaynor55 Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    625
    Likes Received:
    35
    I hate Juwan's jumper. Not because the actual jumpshot is bad (it's good), but because that's ALL Juwan does on offense. A high percentage jumpshot is still less efficient than shots in the paint, or other methods of scoring. Other big men will post up, dunk the ball, get put backs, or crash the offensive boards. Juwan doesn't give you any of those.
     
  18. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    I would just like to point out that Howard is not quite the big bag of nothing that a lot of us like to make him out. He has been able to score his entire career.

    His averages when Yao went down were prettey good. Keep in mind he was the only scorer the Rockets had left on the team when Yao went down and he still hit 46% of his shots.

    20ppg 7rpg 46% field goal attempts.

    I agree that I would love to have Gooden on the team. I think he gives us very similar to what Howard does except in a younger more athletic body. The plus to Gooden is also his rebounding.

    The negitive about Gooden is that there is a reason that someone as talented as him has been on 3 different teams and has only averaged 30 minutes a game one season in his career. I think he lacks proffesionalism and maturity that Howard has.

    Having said that, I would really like to see if JVG could have a positive effect on his career and teach the guy to play some defense. If he could somehow manage to play 30+ minutes a game I could easily see him averaging 15pts and 10 rebounds.
     
  19. JimRaynor55

    JimRaynor55 Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    625
    Likes Received:
    35
    Where did you get these numbers? Which games are you counting? I just looked over Juwan's game-by-game stats, and he did not average 20 ppg without Yao. And if this is just for a handful of games, it doesn't mean much.
     
  20. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    Maybe you should look again:

    Yao last game was against GS.
    Howard was the teams only scoring threat in the remaining 6 games.
    22 pts against the Kings
    25 pts against the Jazz
    15 pts against the Timberwolves
    16pts against the Grizzlies
    31pts against the Nuggets
    8pts against the Spurs

    That is 19.5 ppg if it bothers you to round up 1/2 a point to 20.
     

Share This Page