1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Vassilis Spanoulis agrees to 3-year deal with Rockets

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by ron413, Jul 19, 2006.

  1. Downtown

    Downtown Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    0



    I will challenge you that we will not be disappointed and will be watching him with excitement!!!

    Why? Because he plays with fire which leads me to pointing out two aspect of his game that you did not mention that seem evident from film and from all the reports from those within the Rockets organization who been incessantly tracking him for several years, and, obviously, know more about him than you do. Only time will tell whether these traits V-Span possesses are NBA Level, but I am hoping and believing for the best because we certainly need this from him if we want to return to the Playoffs:

    1. Clearly has instincts for finding that penetrating, slashing thread to the basket and does so fearlessly and aggressively.

    2. Has good court sense and, similarly, has instincts for playing the passing lanes for the steal, but in a more Bobby Sura bulldog manner, not neccesarily with speed and finesse.

    In reference to JVG and Swift from last year`s discussions, while I was in the end disappointed in Swift, I still stand on my statement that one of JVG`s greatest weaknesses is that he is not a positive motivator and molder of players and l find it interesting how we are now hearing, not from posters, but from other NBA players citing that as one of the reasons they do not want to become a Rocket. I, also, find it extremely interesting that one of the greatest motivators and skilled GM`s ever in the game, none other than Jerry West himself, was excited to have Swift return to his fold...
     
  2. matty101

    matty101 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    4
    does vspan have a good shot? Can he spread the floor like Luther? and how is his ball handling? if all this is not to bad then he can definantly help and will be a good fit for the Rockets.
     
  3. holey_billy

    holey_billy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2002
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    nik name VAMPIRE
     
  4. Van Gundier

    Van Gundier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    Van Gundy may or may not be a positive motivator, but Swift wasn't improving under Sidney Lowe, Hubie Brown, and Mike Fratello, either... when he's pretty much been the same under 3 other coaches, I tend not to blame the 4th coach if the player doesn't improve under him. I still think maybe Stromile had a chance to get better (slowly) with more time in the system, but if you are getting Battier and Swift is part of the package, then good luck to him. It's OK with me because I see more promise in Chuck Hayes than I do in Swift.

    The Logo wanted Stro back not so much becaue he think Stro is a future star or anything, but mostly because they lost Lo Wright and Swift can fill Lo's minutes. Besides, the other alternatives for salary matching (Juwan Howard) was gonna be less useful for him than Swift.

    I also wouldn't say that Van Gundy does not develop young players. Yao has developed just fine. Camby developed from a bad rebounder to a great one under Van Guny. Charlie Ward played 44 minutes in the NBA when Van Gundy started using him. One thing about Van Gundy is that he makes you earn your minutes rather than just hand out "developmental minutes" to young guys just so they can "learn". Whether that is a good thing or not can be debated.
     
  5. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,975
    Likes Received:
    11,129

    did they have another basket to put eggs in?
     
  6. Van Gundier

    Van Gundier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not really a good year for baskets this offseason, as most GMs agree. Mike was just about the only one that fits the teams needs really well. The other baskets are merely OK and don't really fit the team needs.

    A few of the other teams might have baskets for trade though, and the Rockets might have some baskets of their own which which to barter.
     
  7. munco

    munco Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    3,715
    Likes Received:
    90
    I know this is just one clip of highlights which has been posted, but I wasn't blown away like some of you guys. I hope I'm wrong.

    HTML:
    <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XT7uOvKGvR8"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XT7uOvKGvR8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
    And people keep comparing him to Ginobli, but based on that clip it seems like an unfair comparison. Maybe I'm missing something.

    HTML:
    <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3F5MznmWpSc"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3F5MznmWpSc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
     
  8. munco

    munco Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    3,715
    Likes Received:
    90
    I know this is just one clip of highlights which has been posted, but I wasn't blown away like some of you guys. I hope I'm wrong.

    <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XT7uOvKGvR8"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XT7uOvKGvR8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

    And people keep comparing him to Ginobli, but based on that clip it seems like an unfair comparison. Maybe I'm missing something.

    <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3F5MznmWpSc"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3F5MznmWpSc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
     
  9. Amel

    Amel Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    10,642
    Likes Received:
    5,733
    same goes here!

    I can't wait to see him play

    most of us will love him and his fire for play!
     
  10. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,639
    Likes Received:
    12,064
    I'm with you munco. The video shows Vspan against matadors, something like you would see in summer league. During regular season NBA games, teams will deny him penetration and force him to hit from outside. If he can't knock down the jumper, he will not be effective. Simple as that. And we can trash the comparisons to Manu. IF he can hit open shots from 20ft and closer, we may be on to something. He just doesn't seem that quick to me.
     
  11. jwalker1

    jwalker1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0

    This is incorrect. First off there is no way he makes 42.4 Million.

    Second, NBA allocates around 500,000 to 700,000 to each team a year for things such as buyouts so it does not come out of the MLE.

    Thirdly V-Span does not get that money, his former team gets the buyout money.

    And I am pretty sure his contract is not "front loaded". The only player in the league that has a contract like that is Joe Johnson, and even that is being litigated.

    I can almost guarantee you V-Span is making more than 2.4 over 4 years. That is not feesible with the league minimum. I think it is like 5.2 over 2 years and only about 1.2 of it is taken out of the MLE, which leaves us with roughly 4 mil left.

    If I was the Rockets I would try to lure Reggie Evans with that money. He is a rough and rugged power foward banger who is a killer rebounder. Problem is whether the Rockets will have to useso of the MLE to sign JL3.

    I also think that we should sign Cato with the league veteran's minimum in which the NBA pays 40%. If does not touch the MLE. Cato did not really play last year and has no value and would need to play one year in Houston where he knows the system and excelled his last year here to raise his stock.
    Hell, maybe he can earn all the money we blew on him.

    And also remember we still have the 4.2 million trade exception. I would like to use that to get Stephen Jackson from Indy who they dont want so much and it is kind of obvious buy them adding Marquis Daniels and Shawne Williams in the draft. And I believe they will also get Harrington from Atlanta in a sign and trade with the 7.5 mil trade exception they got from New Orleans in the Peja deal.

    After doing that CUT Bowen's sorry ass. Then I would trade Juwan Howard to L.A. for Mihm, Aaron McKie and Von Wafer. I dont think they will give us Smush or Cook. I also don't believe Sura will play. That leaves you with this roster.

    C- Yao Ming
    PF- Shane Battier
    SG- Tracy McGrady
    SF- Stephen Jackson
    PG- Rafer Alston
    Bench- Chris Mihm
    Bench- John Lucas III
    Bench- Vassilas Spanoulis
    Bench- Chuch Hayes
    Bench- KelvinCato
    Bench- Kirk Snyder
    Bench- Steve Novak
    Bench- Mutumbo
    Bench- Luther Head

    Of coarse that is too many Bench playes but 2 will be on the NA list. :)
     
  12. krosfyah

    krosfyah Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,811
    Likes Received:
    1,615
    I agree, Ginobli seems like a bad comparison as Manu relies on speed and athleticm.

    I think a good comparison would be our own Bobby Sura. Sura doesn't kill you with his blinding speed but he just keeps pushing and pushing and uses is head to find weaknesses. KB seems to rely on grittiness and willpower which is something we definately need.

    Some of you say KB won't be able to get to the basket much but team will double team and give KB some breathing room. That will open up all sorts of lanes for him to get to the rim.

    He seems like he brings attitude, confidence and hustle. If he can learn JVG's defensive schemes, I predict KB will become JVG's pet player. He has all the tools to become a consomate JVG type of player.
     
  13. HillBoy

    HillBoy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,939
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    Yeah, hopefully. I'm taking a wait and see approach on this guy. Playing in Europe is one thing. Playing in the NBA is another. If he can make the adjustment and (this is the important part) JVG gives him playing time then this move might just end up working in their favor.
     
  14. HillBoy

    HillBoy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,939
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    This is just business as usual for the Rockets. After they lost out on James, they concentrated on getting Spanoulis because he fit their profile: young player with some size who won't be expensive to acquire. For several years now they have stocked the roster with the cheapest players they can find and hoped for the best. This year will be no different except for the fact that JVG's rump will be on the line so it remains to be seen if guys like Snyder & Spanoulis will actually get a real chance to play or if JVG goes down swinging with his "solid veteran" players.
     
  15. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    JWalker I agree with much of what you said, except...

    -What we have left might be enough for Evans, but my #1 choice would be Fred Jones.

    -Our TE is not enough to take on Daniels or S Jac, it would have to a player trade for S Jac. But Jasikevicius or Jones in a sign and trade using the TE does work and is worth considering.

    -John Lucas III will not get more than the min, no undrafted players who blow up in summer leagues that I know of get more. I am 90% sure a 2 year guaranteed contract with a player option is the best contract he could possible get, though I am fine with that.

    -I don't like the Laker trade. I see JaHo as a valuable alternative to Battier at the 4, with Battier getting more minutes generally with JaHo picking more the few times you need more girth there--e.g., when we encounter Brand or Duncan playing the 4 spot. JaHo and change for S Jac if we could sign Evans I would be for however.
     
  16. einstein

    einstein Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2003
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes, but this would've been much better.

    <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yCso8qP_Mm4"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yCso8qP_Mm4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
     
  17. a la rockets

    a la rockets Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2002
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    221
    Hey Einstein, are you going to post this in every single thread?!

    If you love Gay so much the Grizzly's forum is second door to the right!
     
  18. jwalker1

    jwalker1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0

    Thanks for the reply

    Yeah i know SJack makes like 5.8 or something like that so we would have to throw in something. Perhaps a player we get from the Laker trade (if that trade has any truth to it) like VOn Wafer or McKie. Most likely McKie because his salary.

    I feel like Juwan is better that nothing, but 20 mil over the next 3 years is so not worth it. Juwan will only get worst with each year so if you have a chance to unload him do so. He doesn't bang anyhow and can't hold Brand or KG. He has no more lift in his legs (3 dunks last year).

    I actually know Fred Jones (through a chick) and like him as a player but i think we need a PF more ungently. With JL3, V-Span, Alston, Snyder, and Head (with TMac and Battier playing the occasional 2) we don't need anymore guards who are small and don't have a chance to play the 3.

    Granted if we could net him in a sign and trade with thr TE, then go for it. I would take Jasikevicius too in a pakage if we had a player or 2 to make the contracts work (although I don't think Bird is just going to give them away like that)

    There is also the possibility of throwing in Head (although I REALLY like him and would hate to see him go) which would be valuable for them in the Atlanta trade to get Al Harrington since they want him. In return we could rework a trade to SJack instead and Jones or Jake.
     
  19. jwalker1

    jwalker1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0

    Dude, I like Rudy but lets stop bringing this up. It hurts. Let it go.
     
  20. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,438
    Likes Received:
    5,262
    How is only $1.2M of the MLE used for V-Span's deal? Can teams subtract the league minimum salary from how much of the MLE they use when signing their own draft picks? Please explain.

    Also, what IS V-Span's contract? 3 yrs/$5M? 3 yrs/$6M? 4 yrs/$2.4M?
     

Share This Page