1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Surgeon general: No safe level of secondhand smoke

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by bigtexxx, Jun 27, 2006.

  1. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,308
    Likes Received:
    4,655
    Deleted.
     
  2. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,018
    Likes Received:
    3,145

    this is the best part of a great post. i'm all for compromise but the outright ban is weak. bars are for debauchery, plain and simple. go to your bridge club or tupperware party if you're looking for wholesome entertainment.
     
  3. underoverup

    underoverup Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,208
    Likes Received:
    75
    i think this is a really good post, but i still support the smoking ban. :)
     
  4. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,980
    Likes Received:
    2,365

    What a collection of rambling, nonsensical babble. Brah, sorry you wasted 30 minutes of your life posting that. With such powerful arguments as:


    Has the Surgeon General come out with a study that links another person's cell phone use to people around them getting cancer and heart disease? They have with smoking. Your point is irrelevant and nonsensical.

    ..."pretty much"..."I think"...whoa, dude, like, I think you've really got something here. I hear poor people in India eat one bean a week! Why are poor people here complaining about being hungry? They're BABIES!!!

    No, in fact they're not. Quit being lazy and refer to the excellent work of SamFisher in debunking this statement. You did not read the entire thread. Go back and read it, then provide something of value for us.

    LOL I was wondering when you'd have to resort to flinging insults to bolster your point. You've run out of logical arguments (actually you never had any to begin with), so you have to insult me. You lose. I don't even know what you're talking about with my defense of civil liberties. That ends when one person's actions harm another - second hand smoke. Did you even bother to read the Surgeon General's work? You're being lazy. Educate yourself.

    "Passive aggressive weenie"? That's rich. Friend, believe me I have asked many people to stop smoking in front of me. You'd put yours out pretty damn quick if I asked you, too. I love how you just assume things about me. You seem to have acquired Batman Jones syndrome.

    Bottom line is that you fail to recognize the damage that second hand smoke does to others. You selfishly desire to smoke in public, and then tell others that they're babies since they have to endure the health problems that you deal them due to your smoking. Your silly arguments that you presented talk about taking away liberties, but when that "liberty" harms and leads to the death of others, it should not exist. We're not talking about banning smoking. You still have that liberty. We're talking about banning it where it affects others. You failed to understand that point.
     
    #124 bigtexxx, Jun 28, 2006
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2006
  5. losttexan

    losttexan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    595
    Likes Received:
    0
    Give'em He*#!.

    I'm enjoying being of bigtexxxs' side for once.

    ALL EMPLOYEES DESERVE A SAFE WORK ENVIRONMENT!

    If there was some sort of self serve bar that had no one in there but customers then maybe.


    BTW, people thought it would ruin NYC's night life but now even most smokers I know like the ban.
     
  6. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    Yippee, then they can work at a non-smoking bar. It's soooo easy to understand. Just give it a little try.


    Bigtexx's post was so lame it's just sad. It sounds like he has never had an ounce of fun in his life. Some bars should be smokey, dirty etc. I don't want beansprout salad at the biker bar. That's just the way it is.
     
  7. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    And this is less lame? :rolleyes:
     
  8. losttexan

    losttexan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    595
    Likes Received:
    0
    But there would still be employees at the "smoking bar"?

    "just don't work in a coal mine if you don't want black lung" didn't work.
    "just don't work in a building with aspestos if you don't want canser" nope.
    "just don't work in a machine shop if you want to keep your finger" don't think so.
    "hey if they don't want to work 16 hrs a day they can find another job" sorry.

    Why do waiters and bartenders not deserve the same treatment?
     
  9. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    [​IMG]

    Here is a pic of my patio bar (in Rockets mode). It is a real bar. You can drink, smoke, and listen to rock and roll. And during the cooler parts of the year I like to build FIRES in the back!!!!. SO RUN! The fire makes smoke. But it is real fun to get drunk, sit around the fire very late at night and burn things while listening to some tunes. Good times.
     
  10. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    LOL ... this former smoker joins the bigtexxx-SamFisher alliance too!

    Rock on, brah!
     
  11. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    Dude, a lot of bartenders etc smoke themselves. Got it?
     
  12. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,018
    Likes Received:
    3,145
    dirty, smokey bars > clean, sterile "bars"

    i don't actually think texxx's post was too bad, i just have a different opinion. to each his own i say. i just wish smokers still had the freedom of choice that the overly health-conscious do.
     
  13. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    People don't need to drink, and it is a public hazard not only to the drinkers but also to others. Maybe we should ban drinking in bars.

    Also, loud music causes hearing loss, even in people who aren't in a bar for the music. Why can't they just sit in a bar and enjoy their water without having to worry about hearing loss? Maybe we should ban music in bars.

    Also, many people have sex with other people after meeting them in bars, and this is definitely the source of many unwanted pregnancies (which sometimes lead to abortion!) and some even-more-unwanted STDs which could be spread to partners who never go to bars in the first place! Maybe we should ban co-ed bars.

    I have an idea: Let's convert all the dirty dive bars into magic hypoallergenic inflatable castles where no one wears dangerous shoes and we can all giggle at the fluffy bunnies who hippity-hop to some pleasantly low-volume Kenny Loggins hits murmuring in the background at our giant vegetarian picnic of temperate happiness! Well shucks, I am so gosh darn happy that I could just...just...smile faintly! Goodness!

    (p.s. there will be time limits on petting the bunnies to prevent carnal temptations)
     
  14. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    a little. Would brochette been better?
     
  15. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Bwahahahaa! :D
     
  16. Deji McGever

    Deji McGever יליד טקסני

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 1999
    Messages:
    4,013
    Likes Received:
    952
    True...but the difference is, I UNDERSTAND better why the world laughs at the US, like getting a collective a wad in the panties over a smoking ban (or abortion or Rush Limbaugh's Viagra or the political opinions of the Dixie Chicks or the private lives of George W. Bush or Hilary Clinton, just as examples), when there are far more important things to worry about.

    When I lived in LA I never thought how strange it was that not only a helicopter was used to chase down a stolen car, but that news choppers all followed it too. Anywhere else in the world this would be laughed at as an extreme example of conspicuous consumption. Is that much taxpayer money really worth reclaiming someone's '91 Honda Civic?

    Here the only time helicopters are used to chase cars is to blow up cars with terrorists in them, and even then half the country (and world) complains about it. :)

    Well, I'd be just as quick to call them sissies as well. But I was in Spain and Portgugal less than a year ago, and I can tell you from first hand experience, people weren't just smoking in bars, a lot of other things were being administered and no one seemed to give a damn.

    In fact, in Portgugal I don't think there is even an age limit on drinking or smoking. If there is it certainly isn't enforced. I think progressive is a relative term.
     
  17. RunninRaven

    RunninRaven Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2000
    Messages:
    15,275
    Likes Received:
    3,220
    PETA would be all over your ass. Better make it people in bunny suits.
     
  18. fadeaway

    fadeaway Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    14,706
    Likes Received:
    1,193
    Put me firmly on the texxx side of this argument. We have a smoking ban in Ontario now, and it has been great. One of the major things I hated about going out to bars (I still went) was how smelly they made my hair and clothes afterwards, and the sore throat I used to get from breathing in all the smoke. Now, going to a bar is a completely enjoyable experience.

    I see smoking itself and the pathetic attempt to fight for so-called smoker's rights to be a severe weakness of character. When you combine the cost of cigarettes, the evilness of the tobacco industry and the overall general disgustingness of smoking with the negative health effects of first and second-hand cigarette smoke, that seems to be the only logical conclusion. There simply is no real benefit of smoking and I long for the day when it is outlawed completely.
     
  19. Deji McGever

    Deji McGever יליד טקסני

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 1999
    Messages:
    4,013
    Likes Received:
    952
    I'm not. And it didn't take me 30 minutes. I'm a writer by profession. And I'm no MacBeth. My mother wasn't a virgin, and I live with a fat unemployed DJ, not four teenage models or whatever it was.

    The point is I don't want the Surgeon General or ay other goverment official (much less an unelected one) to "protect" me from my own vices that I freely choose. That's one of the reasons I left California.

    The debate isn't about how harmful smoking is. I used to work for the Microbiology and Molecular Genetics Department at UCLA and was the lone smoker on South Campus (excepting the German postdocs in the Chemistry department). I've been told by many of the cancer researchers a visit to their lab would be a compelling argument to never smoke again. Well, there was this one post-doc who used to bum cigs off of me. But she was different from all those Bruins...she got her undergrad degree at Rice and made fun of the PC California people. ;)



    Don't take things so personally when people don't agree with you. No one is insulting you. I'm just mocking your extremely PC position, and mostly for breaking with what I thought were sound political principles about not wanting government to be a nanny.

    I'm in Grad School. I am educating myself.

    Then why do you need the goverment to do it for you?


    People who are concerned about health problems from second hand smoke shouldn't go to a bar. Most of us engage in some sort of activity that others would find self-destructive. Or even dangerous to others. But, frequenting a smokey bar isn't going to kill you. I promise. It might even make you more interesting.

    The bottom line is, you believe that people have all the rights in the world, as long as they are same ones that matter to you. You arguments about smoking in bars, in principle can be used to debunk a lot assumptions you have about what freedom entails, from private gun ownership, to lassaiz-faire economics, to property rights.

    Banning guns, socialized medicine and practicing imminent domain for the good of the community certainly is going to affect the over health and well-being for the majority of people, but you would quickly fight these efforts, I'm sure. Most Americans would, and only because they conflict with their own idea of what liberty entails.

    The difference is, you can chose not to go to a bar, if smoking bothers you that much. And if someone is smoking in a public place, you can make an effort to ask them to stop. Your argument isn't about health. It's about you not liking cigarette smoke.
     
  20. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,018
    Likes Received:
    3,145
    i long for the day that people can mind their own business
     

Share This Page