http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft06/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2426087 In every NFL draft -- actually, with virtually every selection in every round of any draft -- beauty is in the eyes of a team's allegedly elite contingent of talent beholders. Unfortunately for many franchises, those beholders are frequently blind men. Ladies and gentlemen, your Houston Texans, an outfit that might do better were Mr. Magoo executing its lottery selections. Hand out the darts, folks, and take cover. Even quarterback David Carr, throwing from his back, which is where he has been for most of his four seasons in Houston, has better aim than his bosses. Bad enough the loyal fans of Houston have had to suffer through the stigma of four straight losing campaigns, an average of just 4½ victories per year and a team that managed just half as many wins in its fourth season as it did in its expansion year of 2002. Now the fans are saddled with a team suffering from astigmatism. Some suggest Williams beefed up his sack totals against lesser opponents. There's a reason that only one expansion team that has entered the league since 1976, the Bucs, won fewer games in its first four seasons than the Texans have earned, and we saw why on Friday night when Houston bypassed tailback Reggie Bush with the top pick in the draft and opted for defensive end Mario Williams instead. Some teams try to exercise foresight with such threshold football decisions. Houston, on the other hand, apparently makes them blindfolded. By the way, the Bucs, despite winning only 17 games from 1976-79, advanced to the NFC Championship Game in their fourth season. The Texans, with a lot more advantages than those woebegone Bucs ever had in terms of additional draft choices and deals cut with cap-heavy franchises eager to dump veterans with bloated contracts, won two games in their fourth year. Two games. None of this is to suggest that Super Mario will turn into Blooper Mario. Comparisons of Williams to Reggie White, Julius Peppers and Richard Seymour may be hyperbole, but the former North Carolina State star figures to be a terrific player. In time. Certainly he isn't a dominating defender yet, not when he had sacks in just 16 of his 36 appearances for the Wolfpack. Ten of his 14½ sacks in 2005 came in just three games and against lesser opponents. Half of his six sacks in 2004 came in one outing, although, granted, the opponent was Florida State. But you ask yourself: What was this guy doing the rest of the time? Maybe the Texans, who haven't had many answers for anything else in their first four seasons, actually have one for that query. Yeah, right. When you are as a team as bad as the Texans have been, you need to make solid football decisions, and eschewing a playmaker such as Bush, who will have an immediate impact on the league, in favor of a guy still in his gestation period is a dubious call at best. And make no mistake, this was a football decision. Sure, we would all be naïve to suggest the recent off-field publicity generated by Bush's family didn't play some role in the Texans' final decision. But even for a straight arrow like Houston owner Bob McNair, it was likely just a small element. As for the so-called "signability" factor -- the notion that Williams was the easier player with whom to reach an agreement -- well, that was no factor at all. The Texans have no idea what it would have taken to sign Bush, because they simply quit dealing with him. On Thursday at 2 p.m., when agent Joel Segal hung up the phone after a second brief discussion with Texans chief negotiator Dan Ferens, the expectations of the Bush camp were that talks would resume Friday at some point. Great expectations, though, morphed into no explanations when the Texans suddenly went underground. After 2 p.m. Thursday, the next conversation between the Texans and Segal came 10 minutes after the team had issued a news release announcing the Williams deal. Feel free to fill in your own bush line (notice the small "b") at this point. Fact is, the $26.5 million in guarantees that Williams received is better than the best deal the Texans ever offered Bush. Published reports that the sides were on the verge of an accord, that there had been a monumental breakthrough in a marathon Tuesday night bargaining session and that the Texans had cleverly leveraged Bush into a corner by also talking with Williams' agent? Pure fiction. So throw out the "signability" element. Plain and simple, on Friday morning, the Texans brass decided that Williams was their guy. Actually, the criticism of the Texans would be even harsher had they made their decision based solely on the dollars. Instead they exercised bad sense. When you're this bad a team, money shouldn't count, and the only issue should be getting the best player. It says here that the Texans didn't. The irony of the Williams decision is that such picks based on potential generally come from the personnel people in a franchise and not the coaching staff. Coaches, after all, get fired and they want guys who can deliver quickly for them, so they can avoid the queue at the unemployment line. The guess here is that the call on Williams came in large part from first-year head coach Gary Kubiak, who has certainly been ceded some of general manager Charley Casserly's authority and who has far more clout than his predecessor, Dom Capers, ever did. It was Casserly, entering the final year of his contract and rumored in many circles to be moving on after this draft, who worked with someone looking over his shoulder at the end of last season, when McNair imported Dan Reeves as a consultant. In a twist here, it's the personnel guy and not the coach who might be the short-timer. And since Kubiak isn't going anywhere for a while, maybe he exercised a choice for the long-term. If the Texans keep making these kinds of questionable personnel decisions, it's going to take a long term, er, time, to ever transform the franchise into a winner. One assistant coach on the Houston staff, a guy we've known and trusted for a very long time, made this poor attempt at spin on Friday night: By choosing Williams, the Texans actually helped Carr, because an upgraded defense will eventually benefit the bedraggled quarterback. Uh-huh. Fact: In 2002, the Texans' debut season, the team featured the league's 16th-rated defense, a level Houston hasn't reached since then. And Carr, who usually gets the best view of the Reliant Stadium roof when the retractable dome is closed, was sacked 76 times. So much for helping the poor guy out. Giving him a playmaker the ilk of Bush -- now that would have been a gesture of aid. So, whither Bush now? The New Orleans Saints, who own the second overall choice and who have Bush atop their draft board, have privately said they will sprint to the podium to choose the USC star when they are on the clock. They might want to think about walking instead. Run too fast to turn in Bush's name and New Orleans officials might miss some of the many phone calls they will now elicit from teams wanting to move up into the second slot to take a player the Texans didn't want. Yo, Saints guys, that's probably the New York Jets, who own a pair of first-round picks and have sufficient ammunition to land Bush, calling right now. And whither the Texans at this point? Well, nothing against Williams, but it's going to take blind loyalty for a fan base already smarting from the franchise's snub of popular hometown star Vince Young to understand Friday evening's decision.
It is depressing. There are a few guys, like LeBron in the NBA, or Arod or Pujols in MLB, that have superstar status that can transform a franchise. Bush was our LeBron, the guy who would make the years of football failure disappear. Now we will never see him in a Texans uniform. Even if he didn't win a Super Bowl, Reggie (or VY) would have provided something to look forward to every Sunday. I am still in shock that we just drafted a guy who wasn't even top 10 a few months ago over Reggie. I don't think it's hit me yet.
What a nightmare. Is there anyone in sports outside of the Texans' front office who agrees with this?
INJURY on the first game. Gosh, I don't hope BAD on anyone, but I am a Nostradamus, and it will happen.
I DO And for the record....the only blunder we will see is Reggie Bush and Vince Young's mistake of trying to run on the Texans.....and getting canned by Super Mario.
So you believe that Mario will be a better impact player than either Bush or Young? Because that's the only way someone can say that this is a good move.
So then you do believe that. I can accept that. I don't see it happening, but it is at least the only thought process that could possibly be anything close to pleased right now. I just think the odds are greater that either Bush or Young will live up to their potential...and I would choose that player over a great defensive end, for the good of the franchise both on and off the field. But hey, let's hope you are right. Because if you are not, tonight was a train wreck.
It was a train wreck cause of how deep this draft was. If this draft wasnt so deep, I believe a lot of people here would have had a different outlook on this pick. ESPNNEWS, just posted this....Im not sure how accurate it is, given its ESPN were talkin here...but.... 7 DE's hae been chosen #1 in NFL Draft history. 5 of them are Hall of Famers, including Bruce Smith and Ed "To-Tall" Jones If true, this bodes well.
I understand the logic of the writer, but if the concern is getting help for Carr, then D'Brickashaw Ferguson is the pick, not Reggie Bush. Bush is great, opens up your offense, but he's not going to anything more from stopping DE's from getting in your face than Williams - who's only contribution is indirect, as is Bush's This of course presumes Carr is worth helping in the first place.
I just hope we are moving up in the first round to draft a superfast defensive back because Mario is going to need help chasing down Vince Young on the far side.
It's a depressing article, but so true. All you Williams supporters should read it and understand just what the Texans have botched instead of drinking the Charlie Casserly kool-aid.
This is EXACTLY why I think Williams was a mistake and one that could haunt the franchise for a decade. These are MAJOR decisions that set the tone for your entire organization. You have the opportunity at two guys, both of whom have superstar charisma and talent, and you pass on it. When you think of championship teams and franchises, you associate them with one marquee name: New England - Tom Brady Baltimore - Ray Lewis St. Louis - Kurt Warner Denver - John Elway Green Bay - Brett Farve Nothing against Williams, but unless he becomes Reggie White part deux, we just passed on two guys who could've been the face of a franchise that desperately needs a direction. This was a defining moment for the Texans and they flushed it down the toilet.
Mike Celizic thinks that Houston was right to pass on Bush. Article on MSNBC Sports Since I converted to being a Rams fan during my stint living in STL, I don't really follow the Texans much. My dad though thinks the Texans have lost their mind on this one. He was hoping to see both Davis and Bush playing in the Houston backfield. His excitement towards the upcoming 2006 season has just been popped like a prankster sticking a pin in a kids balloon. Once again the Texans have proudly picked up where the Oilers left off.
I don't know about you, but I don't care to be like the Buffalo Bills and enjoy watching my team every Sunday (which I would) but not have a ring to show for it in that long of a period of time. The NBA is the only sport, IMO, where one player can really take a team from the bottom to the top...and they still have to have the right role players to fill in. A-rod and Pujols haven't won it all either. Pitching wins you titles in baseball. In football you've got to have good talent everywhere, not necessarily superstars. The Patriots, Steelers, Bucs, and Ravens have all won without true superstars (Brady wouldn't be a superstar on any other team). The Texans can get their with an improved defense and an improved o-line.